Roman Cervenka: An In-Depth Look



Yesterday the Calgary Flames signed Czech center Roman Cervenka to a 1-year contract with a salary cap hit of $3.775M (incl bonuses). It was a move nobody saw since Calgary is not known for a strong scouting presence in the KHL, and at this point in the Flame’s offseason the only rumors had been regarding the coaching position.

So how does Cervenka really look for the Flames? Will this be a case of signing a player who succeeded in a lesser league and can’t turn it on in the NHL?

The History

With a December birthday, Cervenka was draft eligible in the summer of 2004. At that point he had one professional season in the Czech "elite" league, playing 15 games and notching 1 assist. His 8 playoff games were hardly spectacular either, but at this point Cervenka was a 17 year old kid who was drastically undersized. In fact, as noted by Robin Brownlee yesterday after the signing, Cervenka was just 127 pounds in his draft season. It’s therefore not surprising Cervenka went undrafted, and his next couple seasons in the Czech league were fairly lacking – though his games played and ice time both increased.

After a mediocre season which saw Cervenka post a 6-6-12 line in 51 games, the small Czech briefly lit up the playoffs, scoring 3-1-4 in 6 games. He followed that post-season success (which would be common a feature of his play) with a 2007-08 campaign where he scored 19-11-30 in 41 games and 4-4-8 in 14 playoff games. His true break through was in 2008-09. He was the second leading scorer on his team, Slavia Praha HC, managing 59 points in 51 regular season games and another 24 points in 18 post-season games. His last season in the Czech league was his best: 30-43-73 in 50 games. That was also the best season by any scorer in the Czech league that year.

In 2010-11 Roman Cervenka signed with Avangard Omsk of the KHL. He played on a line with a semi-well known hockey player named Jaromir Jagr and scored 61 points in 51 games, best on the team. When Jagr left for the Philadelphia Flyers, there was a falloff in his regular season play, but he still led Omsk in scoring and again absolutely lit up the playoffs; with 11-11-22 in 20 games, it didn’t seem to matter who Cervenka played with – just that he played.

And that led him to this point.

The Scouting Report

A Russian scout described Cervenka to Hockey Prospectus’ Corey Pronman as "one heck of a hockey player who can play a top six without any problem." That’s absolutely high praise. When asked about the 26-year old center, Pronman also complimented Cervenka’s hands and vision, though he also mentioned some areas that need work:

"He’s got high-end hands and vision, but only average skating ability and a little below-average for a smaller player. While he’s improved his physicality the last year or so, due to size/strength combo he’s replacement level in that area.

Still the offensive skills are tremendous, and if he pans out could be an above-average scoring 2nd line forward. For a team that couldn’t score last season and is devoid of any top forward prospects breaking into that role next year (outside of Baertschi)…I fully approve of this signing. With the depth chart he’s entering and his talent level, Cervenka could be a great surprise if he transitions well into the NHL."

The Flames will likely not need Cervenka for his physicality, so long as he can take an average NHL hit. Instead, what the Flames need is what Cervenka excels at: scoring.

The Expectations

A lot of people were asking for his NHLE (NHL equivalency) – which is, unfortunately, something of a problematic request. A KHL equivalency has been calculated, but there are some issues with it. Bruce Peter of Puck Worlds calculated a rough NHLE for KHL players to be ratio of about 0.65. The issue is a small sample size owing to relative youth of the KHL; moreover, most of the samples that are available aren’t ideal as they’re low quality players – your Kyle Wellwoods, for instance – who are the most frequent transfers between the two leagues.

In the above linked article, Peter lists the old Russian League equivalency (which is out of date, but at least didn’t have those issues) at 0.82.

Finally, FlamesNation’s dedicated stats guru, Rob Vollman, isolated Jiri Hudler and Old Jaromir Jagr as the best comparisons, given both KHL stats (100 points in 105 regular season KHL games) and perceived ability. The following table contains all the available comparisons*:

*Note that the KHL stats I’m using are both seasons and playoffs (for the best possible sample size) while the equivalency stats are pro-rated for a single full NHL season. I’ve also tossed in his last two Czech league seasons for kicks.

Method Goals Assists Points
KHL Stats 70 61 131
KHL/NHLE (0.65) 27.2 23.7 51
Russia/NHLE (0.82) 34.4 29.9 64.3
Czech/NHLE (0.74) 38.8 44.4 83.1
Average 33.5 32.7 66.13

I’d be shocked if he managed the sort of numbers suggested by the Czech league equivalencies (he’d likely be the highest scoring player on the Flames), but given a nice SH% boost and good linemates, I think the average (66 points) is an acceptable upper-end/ceiling. Chances are we’ll see a season somewhere around where Vollman estimated – 55 or so points is a good middle area assuming appropriate acclimation to the North American game. That’s nothing to sneeze at, given this is an asset acquired for nothing but the time of Feaster, Weisbrod, and some scouts.

The Fit


Given his expected output, where can we expect to see Cervenka line up? Chances are Jokinen is gone, which means Cervenka will absolutely be a top six center. It’s probably safe to assume (given nobody currently signed for next season is traded) he’ll stand between Jarome Iginla and Alex Tanguay, though there’s a chance he’ll line up with Glencross, Cammalleri or…Baertschi?

At this point in the off-season, with so many changes pending, line projections are tough. I can guarantee one thing though – if Horak and Cervenka end up playing together it’ll be very Roman-Czech (I’ll be here all week. Make sure to try the veal).

For now, it’s impossible to know if Cervenka will manage to translate his scoring on unfamiliar ice in the NHL. He’s a guy who has never skated on this side of the pond and sometimes European stars have a difficult time adjusting to the different sized ice and physical demands of the NA game.

If he makes the leap successfully, the Flames have filled a big gap in their organizational depth chart with a 26-year old center who can score. If not, then he’ll prove to be a somewhat pricey* but transient mistake.

*If he makes his bonuses that is.

  • supra steve

    Posted this in the previous thread, but thought i’d throw it up here also:

    Can’t help but be a little excited for this acquisition. Didn’t give up any assets, for a potential top six forward.

    I also recall about two years ago, possibly during the olympics, Jagr raving about this guy saying something to the effect of “he’ll be a star in the nhl someday”. Take that with a grain of salt, but I can’t help but wonder if Philly wins the cup, perhaps JJ would want to finish out his career riding shotgun with his good friend and countryman.

  • One thing about the Czech league, in my KHL equivalencies post you’ll notice that the Czech Extraliga has dropped in quality significantly since those original NHLE measurements were taken. It is now closer in standing with the Swiss NLA than it is with the Elitserien (Sweden) or SM-Liiga (Finland), for example. So yes, I would be very surprised if Cervenka was putting up those kinds of numbers in the NHL that is CEL-NHL comparables suggest.

    For reference, I had the Czech league at .58 compared to the KHL, which roughly works out to a .38 NHLE if you use my numbers (0.65 KHL-NHL). Obviously, I think the sample is a poor quality one from KHL to NHL, but the CEL to KHL one I have a lot of confidence in. It’s why you don’t see players jumping from the Czech league straight to the NHL anymore. It’s clearly a step below the AHL.

  • In terms of NHL competition and ice-size, the only stats we have to look at recently are the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver.

    He played 5 games with the 7th place Czech Republic… 0G 2A 2PTS TOI 12:10

    Not great offensive output but the Czech’s never scored much, either. It’s also worth noting that his ice time dipped as the tournament went on. Averaging 13:25 in round robin and in their final game he only got 9:01.

    However, Pronman’s analysis is encouraging. Even at 40 points he would’ve been the Flames second highest-scoring centre.

  • It looks like a nice signing to me and the contract appears to be fair for both side. If he doesn’t perform, he doesn’t achieve the performance bonuses. If he does, then he fills a short term need.

    His UFA status at the end of the season makes this an ultimate tryout…

  • Robert Cleave

    It’s a fairly risk-free move, in my view, and as I mentioned last night on Twitter, the line in the sand for me is 40 points or so. If you look at the top 180 forwards, which should cover off almost every top sixer in the NHL worth a damn, a middling 2nd liner in terms of scoring would get right in that range. Brooks Laich was the 135th leading scorer this year with 41 points, and 135th amongst forwards would obviously be right at the mid-point of second line productivity.

    At any rate, if Cervenka can hit that sort of production without hurting the team in any other way, Calgary wins. If he actually reaches his NHLe and gets into the 55 point range, that would have been good enough for 70th in scoring this year. I’m loathe to expect that much, given his decline in productivity this year without Jagr riding shotgun, but there’s still a fair bit of range in potential output between him hitting his NHLe and being a bad bet.

  • Robert Cleave

    I posted this in the other thread as well but it bears repeating. For those that want the rebuild, this is something they REALLY should be behind. He’s younger, skilled and will fit into the top 6 and shoves out our older players (jokinen).

    • Bean-counting cowboy

      Does it really say anything about a rebuild? This is a one year deal that will leave him a UFA at the season. It likely does move Olli out and it gives youngsters a year to develop, but it could just as easily be looked at as a “win now” addition.

  • BobB

    1. I like this move because it fits within what I view as a promising age window for our “veteran” Flames: The ’82-’85 years. I realistically see the guys in this window being the earliest likely to be competitive in the future, and not be too old to compete in 3 years or so.

    Any forward/def. older than ’82 on this team has no future IMHO and should immediately be traded for assets if it makes sense.

    2. I think that Roman has potential to be a successful 3rd line centre on a good team. He’s not a good skater, and in this league any player who’s lacking skating is equiv. to a line lower or 5 years older. He’s small and can’t skate well…. he better be resilient and tenacious, cause he’s going to take a beating…or be invisible.

    3. Feaster deserves props for exploring less conventional sources of talent which are both coming with experience and can be had at reasonable cost (if the 900k base is true) and low risk (1 year).

    • SmellOfVictory

      I know these are outliers, but neither Cory Perry nor Ryan Getzlaf is a good skater. It’s not 100% necessary that a guy be a good skater to be in a team’s top-6, although skating deficiencies are certainly difficult to compensate for.

  • Robert Cleave

    I change my stance on High Rish/High Reward as well. This signing pretty well has ZERO risk attached to it. With all the secondary bonuses(Hart/Selke/etc.) that he would have to get to get that cap dollar would mean he would have to be the best player in the league and at 3.8million thats a good deal. And if he doesn’t come close, he costs about as much as a typical 4th liner and will be shipped back to Russia.

    This is pretty well zero risk and still a high reward.

  • Gange

    However Freidman said that he wasn’t aware of many teams chasing him. I’m very cautiously optimistic about this guy. I’m much more optimistic about the direction of the team.

  • Subversive

    Yep, agree with most of the commenters. I think it’s a low risk move, in the sense that they risk nothing but money (and not mine, at that) to acquire the player.

    If it pushes Sex Panther out the door, so much the better, there’s no way he sustains his level of production from this season going forward.

  • Bean-counting cowboy

    Now trade Iggy + whatever else it takes to land Jordan Staal & the centre position is likely pretty solid for many years to come.

    Man wouldn’t that be sweet. Staal-Cervanka-Backlund with Cammi as a possible fill in if needed. We have lots of 4th line center options on the club going forward – Jones, Horak, Reinhart et al. Not to mention Stajan.

    Speaking of Stajan. My thought is for Feaster to rid him, he may need to be used as part of a package with the big 2. We take less back in return on Kipper or Iggy if you take Stajan. In either of those trade scenarios we would likely need to take some salary back, but if it was for lesser term & maybe a position where we need a little more depth (defense for example) I could see it working.

    • Graham

      Staal is either staying with the Pens or going to the Hurricanes/Rangers to play with his brother. Freidmanns let the rumor out a few times that all the Staal brothers would like to play on the same team at some time in the near future. IF we traded for him, it’d probably be a rental at best.

  • Robert Cleave

    If he makes the leap successfully, the Flames have filled a big gap in their organizational depth chart with a 26-year old center who can score. If not, then he’ll prove to be a somewhat pricey* but transient mistake.

    *If he makes his bonuses that is.

    If he hits all of his “A” bonuses, the Flames will have a 60 point forward that made an extra 850k, or about 1.8M for the year. That’s incredibly cheap for that level of productivity. If, through some miracle, he hits all of his “B” bonuses, he’ll almost certainly have won the Hart trophy, amongst other things. His salary is a total non-issue.

  • Graham

    Its more a high risk /reward proposition for Feaster. If Cervenka pans out as a decent second line center great, plus for Feaster.

    However, if Cervenka is slow to adapt, their is almost no goal scoring at center behind him. Backlund has the ability but hasn’t shown it (yet?), Jones isn’t a scorer, Stajan is Stajan…If Cervenka struggles this team could be extremely weak down the middle, and set for another slow start.

    I wonder if the ownwers will be more willing to bury Stajan in the minors this year? Cervenka, Backlund and Jones with another signing (even Jokinen at a good price) makes a lot more sense…

  • Bean-counting cowboy

    @ Arik

    Eligible for calder eh? Sure would be fun to watch him & Baertschi duke it out for the prize. ha ha. It almost rings of Sergei Makarov for the Flames all over again if Cervanka were to win it.

    OK he’s not quite that old.

  • Of course Feaster said a lot of teams were after him.

    But he chose the Flames. How glorious.

    Like his crap about how close the Flames were to signing Richards. Bragging about 2nd place when we offered the most money. What’s that Seinfeld quote? “Of all the losers, we were first.” Pretty much sums up the season too.

  • Bean-counting cowboy

    @ TBonnar and Colin

    RE: rebuilding or going for it:

    I think that Feaster has shown in his tenure that the plan is to do neither, or both depending on how you look at it & here are some examples:

    -Trade Lankgow for Stempniak. Could be viewed very similarly to Cerevanka vs. Jokinen. Get younger, while still being competitive now.

    -Trade deadline – don’t buy or sell. Stay competitive, but don’t give up on the future.

    -Regeher for Butler – get younger while trying to stay competitive.

    I don’t believe Flames ownership are in for a tear down re-build, but have rather given Feaster a mandate to remain competitive while finding creative ways to shed salary & get younger at the same time.

    • MC Hockey

      BC Cowboy has it exactly right. Feaster will rebuild without also ‘tearing down’.

      Iginla is going to be our ‘Alfredsson’, the historic vet who stays as the team is reconstructed around him. He doesn’t want to leave, and the Flames don’t want to trade him, so we should get used to his presence.

      Feaster has gradually pruned salary (Kotalik!) and aging vets (Regehr, Langkow, etc.) from the roster, and has found replacement level players on the cheap (Comeau). He’s also overseen an overhaul of the prospect pipeline and improved our farm team.

      Some fans insist on the ‘tear it all down’ approach as the only way to rebuild the Flames – which is garbage.

      Detroit never tears down. Coloumbus does it every few years. The Oilers have been rebuilding since they lost Pronger.

      As for the Cervenka move itself, it is all but perfect. Add a skilled pivot, at the right age, and all it cost was his contract $ – which itself happens to be a value deal.

  • T&A4Flames

    Again, this has nothing to do with keeping or not keeping Jokinen.

    Unless the Flames are comfortable starting the season with Backlund or Stajan in the top 6 (they likely are not) then they need another top 2 C. Especially since Cervenka is an unproven commodity at this point in time. Do people really think the Flames will go forward with Backlund, Stajan, and Cervenka as their options for top 2 C? Cervenka has also been playing LW in the KHL which muddies the water a bit more.

    I would prefer they look at Gaustad or another dedicated shut down C as opposed to Jokinen. But unfortunately bringing on Cervenka doesn’t force the Flames hands in not keeping Jokinen.

    • RexLibris

      Camm was playing center towards the end of the year as well and can easily switch to that role if need be. So we have Backlund, Stajan, Cervenka, Horak and most likely Jones as possible centermen, would be nice to add another big one (just not Jokinen).

      @b-c C

      Yeah it’s not a complete rebuild, but should make the rebuild crowd happy because we are getting younger rather then spending money on Jokinen (hopefully not being resigned). We are hopefully going to stay a bit younger and still be competitive, it’s all about just getting to the playoffs.

  • Arik


    Seems to me that Flames are quite comfortable with Backlund in the 2C slot. Especially if they really are into the whole PUCKS system that Feaster keeps going on about.

    • ChinookArchYYC

      @ Kent Wilson
      @ Robert Vollman
      @ FN Advanced Stats Guys

      I’ve been wondering for a while on how many schools of thought there are in hockey Advanced Stats arena. Is there a general concensus on the stats used? Do most or all statisticians have the same view on which stat are most or least important, or how to properly analyze the stats, etc.? I’m asking, because the analysis is so new.

      Also, has anyone seen, or understand what the PUCKS system tracks and reports? Lastly, is Chris Snow actually any good or does he have a lot of respect in the Advanced Stats community?

      • There has been no Moneyball style stats revolution in hockey yet. There is more or less a consensus and growing body of work around the role of randomness, circumstances and possession on outcomes (with a few notable detractors) but that’s mostly outside the pro field.

        Because teams never really go on record to say what kind of data they use or analyze, it’s impossible to know how deep some of this stuff has penetrated the upper offices. As far as I can tell, some orgs are still pretty old school while others are aggressively embracing and pursuing advanced analysis. Mike Gillis mentioned Cody Hodgson’s zone starts in his press conference recently for example.

        As for PUCKS, from what I can tell it’s a searchable video/highlight database which can be used to parse games/shifts/events etc. So if you want to see all of Iginla’s shifts under certain circumstances, or all of Cammalleri’s goals, etc, the system allows you to filter the search and then brings up all the relevant highlights. Im sure it allows people to interact with the video as well in certain ways (slow-down, rewind, add graphics, etc.).

        As for Snow, he was known as a progressive thinker when the Wild hired him, but I don’t know enough specifics to say to what degree that’s true or not. I do know he contacted Gabriel Desjardins of last summer at some point after he was hired by the Flames and was asking about corsi etc.

        Gabe told Snow to contact me at some point, but he never has. Probably in part because of my position as “media” (worse…”blogger”) here in Calgary.

  • RexLibris



    As for Hemsky wanting the Oilers to sign Cervenka, they tried that before with Petr Sykora and they investigated seriously into Jagr a couple years ago. I don’t think they were going to be that close to signing Cervenka unless they could move out Belanger.

    The addition of Cervenka seems to keep with the Flames additions over the last few years. They have added a player at a position that will force someone to play out of their depth or ahead of their learning curve.

    As I said before, as far as Feaster actually pursuing other options I have no problem with his motives. It behooves him, and every GM, to look at every possibility when trying to improve the team.

    I just hope that expectations amongst some of the fan base (not necessarily the ones who read FN) don’t lean towards this player being the next Dino Cicarelli or Joe Mullen.