Defending Jay Feaster

When Jay Feaster officially replaced Darryl Sutter as the General Manager of the Calgary Flames in the December of 2010, a collective sigh of relief echoed through Calgary. After all, Sutter’s dubious moves were jeopardizing the already down ward spiralling and aging Flames team – one no trade clause at a time.

That feeling of relief, was then quickly substituted by a (possibly pre-mature) sense of optimism. After all, Feaster was at the helm of the Tampa Bay Lightning when they beat out the Flames for the Stanley Cup in ’04. What many people didn’t know is that Feaster inherited most of the cup winning core. Richards, Lecavalier, Khabibulin, St. Louis and many others were already there when Feaster assumed the commanding role. Yes, he augmented the key pieces with a few additions (namely Daryl Sydor and Ruslan Fedotenko) that were imperative in the Lightning’s run to the Stanley Cup Final, but the point is most of the heavy lifting had been done prior to his arrival.

So all the praise and hoopla he earned following the Cup win wasn’t all that warranted.

One word I used to describe him when he was named the Interim GM here in Calgary: overrated. Besides his minimal involvement in crafting that one championship team in Tampa, he also carried with him an abysmal drafting record with the Bolts. Excluding the Steven Stamkos pick for obvious reasons, only 4 players drafted under Feaster went on to play over 150 NHL games – none of them becoming more than role/replacement players once reaching the NHL. He did draft Karri Ramo though, so let’s hope he hit that one out of the park.

Nonetheless, optimism ran high in Calgary that Jay Feaster would be the man to right the ship and take the Flames to the promised land.

House on Fire

Unfortunately, that hasn’t been the case. When Feaster was promoted to the GM role, he was faced with two problems: An unreasonable pressure o win and an aging, sub par, over paid roster. He had a truck load of no-trade clauses to deal and barely any cap space to operate with.

If Feater tried to look to the prospect system for help, he’d be met by only Greg Nemisz, Tim Erixon and Leland Irving. Everything was pretty bleak. He slowly began to cleanse the organization of these trouble spots and mend the tears that Darryl Sutter’s madness had created. He also had to do this with the intention of staying competitive and making the playoffs – which has proved to be an impossible task.

Slowly, the prospect system has been rebuilt and cap flexibility has been restored. Yet, a portion of the fan base is still unhappy. Patience has seemingly run out and people want a change. But why? What has Feaster done to merit a pink slip? As my colleague here at FlamesNation Ryan Pike once wisely said, "Feaster inherited a house on fire, put it out and is now taking heat because the house is slightly charred." I couldn’t agree more.

All Feaster has done in Calgary is clean up the mess that Sutter left behind and only now is beginning to put his own stamp on the club. My opinion is probably in the minority when I say this but I think Feaster has done an admirable job considering the circumstances.

The Feaster Resume

You may not agree with me, but when you look at the facts, most of what Feaster as done during his time in Calgary has benefited the club. Have a look for yourself:


Note: The players acquired by the Flames will be first and both bolded and italicized




Freddy Modin for 2011 7th round pick (#193-Colin Blackwell)

February 28, 2011

Not the best trade as Modin was plagued by injury and only ended up playing 4 games for Calgary. But considering what they gave up, not a big deal.

Roman Horak,

2011 2nd round pick (#45-Markus Granlund),

2011 2nd round pick (#57-Tyler Wotherspoon) for Tim Erixon,

2011 5th round pick (#133-Shane McColgan)

June 1, 2011

After being handcuffed by Erixon’s refusal to sign with Calgary, Feaster managed to get excellent value from the New York Rangers. While Erixon still has the potential to be a stud defensemen, Calgary got 3 (very good) prospects in return. Considering neither Erixon nor McColgan are with the Rangers anymore, I’d say Calgary wins this trade.

Chris Butler and

 Paul Byron for Ales Kotalik

 Robyn Regehr

2012 2nd round pick (#44 – Jake McCabe)

June 25, 2011

I don’t really want to talk about this. Feaster got fleeced, plain and simple.

Jordan Henry for Keith Seabrook

July 9, 2011

AHLer for AHLer. No real winner or loser here, although Henry did put in good minutes for the Heat during his time there.

Pierre-Luc Letourneau-Leblond for a 2012 5th round draft pick (#135 – Graham Black)


Stupid move and Black has put up back to back 50 point seasons in the WHL. This could come back and bite Calgary in the butt. We’ll see.

Lee Stempniak for Daymond Langkow

August 29, 2011

Langkow was coming off that gruesome neck injury and was in the twilight of his career anyway. Stempniak is a big part of this Flames team right now and has turned in good value for the Flames. Win for Calgary.

Blair Jones for Brendan Mikkelson

January 6, 2012

Low upside prospect for low upside prospect. I actually thought Jones was filling in that 4th line center role well this year, but the coaching staff seem to agree. Mikkelson also got some NHL games under his bet with the Lightning but has since moved on. I’d call this deal a draw.

Michael Cammalleri,

 Karri Ramo,

2012 5th round pick (Brett Kulak) for Rene Bourque,

 Patrick Holland,

2013 2nd round pick (#36 – Zach Fucale)

January 12, 2012

The winner of this deal will ultimately be decided by the prospects involved. Cammalleri and Bourque have brought relatively the same value to their respective teams, it all lies on what Holland/Fucale and Kulak/Ramo do. At this point, I’d call it a draw but Ramo’s performance this season will likely decide it.

Brian Connelly for Brendan Morrison

January 27, 2012

Another low key move, the Flames traded Morrison who no longer had a spot on the team to Chicago for Connelly who helped out the farm team. No winners. No losers. If anything it was a favour to Morrison – finding him a home.

Akim Aliu for John Negrin

January 30, 2012

This deal looked a lot better for Calgary at the end of the 2011/12 season with the way Aliu played those final two games, but now this is just another AHLer for AHLer deal.

2012 1st round pick (#21-Mark Jankowski)

2012 2nd round pick (#42-Patrick Sieloff) for 2012 1st round pick (#14-Zemgus Girgensons)

June 22, 2012

The infamous Jankowski deal that made some Flames fan cringe – when the trade was announced as well as when the 21st pick was made. After all, Finnish dynamo Tuevo Teravainen (projected to go Top 5) was still on the board and Jankowski was projected to go mid 2nd. But now when looking at this deal – Jankowski and Sieloff for Girgensons – it’s a win for the Flames. Girgensons doesn’t project to be anything above a fringe second line guy while Jankowski could be a Top 6 center and Sieloff a Top 4 defenseman.

Dennis Wideman for Jordan Henry and a 2013 5th round pick

June 27, 2012

That’s about market value for the rights of a good NHLer like Wideman so nothing to complain about. Henry’s an AHL level guy and the 5th rounder was dealt.

7th Round Pick (#198 – John Gilmour) for Henrik Karlsson

January 21, 2013

Karlsson had no future in Calgary (he had just lost the back up job to Leland Irving) so turning him into a decent prospect was a job well done by Feaster and the scouting staff.

Mike Testwuide for Mitch Wahl

February 25, 2013

AHLer for AHLer. Nothing to see here folks.

Brian McGrattan for Joe Piskula

February 28, 2013

Well not only did fan favourite Brian McGrattan add needed grit to the team, he also turned into a scoring machine, sniping 3 silky geno’s – matching his previous career total (LOL). Ryane Clowe had the same amount of goals as MacGrattan last year and the Rangers paid way more than an AHL defensemen to get him. Yeah, I’d rather have MacGrattan too. Who needs skating anyway? Career defining win for Feaster 😉

Ben Hanowski, Kenny Agostino and a 2013 1st Round Pick (#28 – Morgan Klimchuck) for Jarome Iginla

March 27, 2013

We’re now wading into "wait and see" territory as these latest trades can’t be fairly judged for another few years. On the surface though, 2 solid prospects and Hanowski is pretty good return acknowledging the circumstances Iginla was traded in. Getting good return on an average 35 year old NHLer who will only go to ONE team is no easy task. Even if that guy is Jarome Iginla. Iginla is also no longer a member of the Penguins so those 3 pieces for 28 "eh" games of Iggy seems like good, bordering on great value for Calgary. For the record, I would’ve preferred Boston‘s deal.

Mark Cundari, Reto Berra and a

2013 1st round pick (#22 – Emile Porier) for Jay Bouwmeester

April 1, 2013

Wasn’t a fan of this deal when it happened and frankly, I’m still not one. Bouwmeester is still a premier NHL defensemen and albiet a little over paid, he’s worth more than what was acquired. It seemed like Feaster felt like he needed to tear it all down at once and may have rushed this deal a little. Best case scenario is that Berra is a starting goaltender, Cundari a Top 4 D and Porier a Top 6 forward but to me it looks more likely to turn into 3 average guys for Bouwmeester. Many media outlets however reported this was the only deal that included a 1st rounder – which would’ve been a must – so providing that be true, Feaster did ok. Again though, we can’t judge this trade fairly until we see what the three guys turn into.

2013 5th Round Pick (#135 – Eric Roy) for Blake Comeau

April 3, 2013

The fact that Feaster actually got something – let alone a solid prospect – out of a deal for Blake Comeau is magic. Tip of the hat to you sir.

Corban Knight for a 2013 4th Round Pick (#97 – Michael Downing)

June 18, 2013

As of right now, Corban Knight is one of the top prospects in the organization, he fills a massive need at center and most importantly, is better than Michael Downing. Things can however, change. Today, it’s a steal for Calgary, but for all we know Knight will bust and Downing will be the next Bobby Orr (he won’t but for argument sake go with it).

 David Jones and Shane O`Brien for Cory Sarich and Alex Tanguay

June 27, 2013

We’ll have to see how these guys do with their respective teams in 2013/14 but on the surface, Calgary gets younger, faster and harder to play against (Sarich doesn’t add toughness from the press box) which are all things they identified as goals. Looks good to me.

 T.J. Galiardi for a 2015 4th Round Pick

July 2, 2013

We won’t know the verdict of this one until long down the road but Galiardi is a serviceable NHLer with a little upside still remaining which more than can be said for most 4th Rounders. Still, this one is long from decided.

Kris Russell for a 2014 5th Round Pick

July 5, 2013

Same as Galiardi, Russell is a better player than most 5th rounders will become, but we’ll have to wait and see how it plays out.

So of the 22 trades Feaster completed as GM of the Flames, I would say he only got ruined once – on the Reghr deal, although the PL3 trade was a loser the moment it was consummated. Everything else is either fair (in the case of the AHLer for AHLer), good value or to be determined. I joked about MacGrattan being his career defining trade but in reality the Iginla and Bouwmeester moves will be the ones that will define his stay as GM of the Flames. Both look decent at the moment but only time will tell how good the return for the Flames really was.

So the trade record isn’t too shabby thus far.

Maybe it’s his signings or drafting? Let’s take a look.


During his 3 summers at the helm of the Flames, I’d say Feaster’s Free Agent Frenzy activity has been defined more by deals he didn’t make than the deals he did. ‘Twas just 2 summers ago – in 2011, that Feaster moved heaven and earth to try and sign Brad Richards and rekindle the relationship they had in Tampa Bay. His failure to do so is currently being praised by every Flames fan on the planet. Having that monster deal attached to that player right now would be disastrous to the rebuild. In fact, if Richards was here there might not even have been a rebuild initiated.

Then there was the curious case of Ryan O’Reilly. What a rollercoaster that was. It went from pure elation "omg we’re gonna get a franchise centerman for only a 1st and a 3rd and we’re gonna make the playoffs with him" to disappointment "damn they matched" to a mix of horror and relief "we could have given Colorado our 1st and 3rd and then lost the player on waivers?!?! Thank god they matched!".  

Either of those two deals happening would probably result in Feaster losing his job. Imagine if both signings had happened, the franchise would’ve been in the worst spot of any NHL team in recent memory.

Feaster’s actual signings however aren’t too bad. Aside from a couple of uncomfortable term and money combinations handed to Alex Tanguay ($3.5M cap hit for 5 years) and Dennis Wideman ($5.25M cap hit for 5 years) it’s been mostly recruiting college kids and signing/re-signing guys in the organization, although the Anton Babchuk and Brendan Morrison re-signs were bad bets, albeit not terribly damaging ones.

Feaster also managed to sign Curtis Glencross to incredible hometown discount with a cap hit of $2.55 million for another 2 years which currently seems too good to be true. He took a swing at Roman Cervenka and has taken heat for KHL sniper’s flop in Calgary, but it was a decent low risk, medium reward gambit for the Flames. In fact, I’d like to see more of these type of ventures – eventually one of these home run swings will connect.

Juri Hudler’s 4 years at 4 million per is another deal that could be a source for criticism because he’s now one of the highest paid players on the team and not really the sort of talent that is going to turn the ship around. Hudler performed well last year, though he may not last in town over the long term.

A few notable re-signings include Lee Stempniak, Mikael Backlund (twice) and TJ Brodie to good term, fair money deals. A couple of head scratchers in the form of Anton Babchuck (2 years, $7M) and Cory Sarich (2 years, $4M) but neither did anything more than fill the press box and slightly lighten Murray Edwards’ pockets.

Everything else has been relatively low risk and low profile. No real Glen Sather bombs on Feasters resume in Calgary to this point. Yeah, he almost bit the bullet twice with Richards and O’Reilly, but he didn’t and in my opinion that’s all that matters.


So his drafting record is the only tangible thing (short of the team’s performance) left to judge Feaster’s time in Calgary and we all now that there’s little here that speaks against Feaster and his management team. He’s done a masterful job of turning the prospect base into one of the best in the league. Nonetheless, let’s take a quick look: 

#, Year



13, 2011

F Sven Baertschi

Top 6 NHLer with upside

21, 2012

F Mark Jankowski

Top 10 team prospect with Top 6 upside

6, 2013

F Sean Monahan

Top 2 team prospect with top line potential

21, 2013

F Emile Poirier

Top 10 team prospect with Top 6 potential

28, 2013

F Morgan Klimchuck

Top 10 team prospect with Top 6 potential

45, 2011

F Markus Granlund

Top 15 prospect with Top 6 potential

57, 2011

D Tyler Wotherspoon

Top 15 prospect with Top 4 potential

42, 2012

D Pat Sieloff

Top 15 prospect with Top 4 potential

75, 2012

G Jon Gillies

Top 10 prospect with starting potential

67, 2013

D Keegan Kanzig

Prospect with potential

104, 2011

F Johnny Gaudreau

Top 5 prospect with top line potential

105, 2012

D Brett Kulak

Top 20 prospect with Top 6 potential

124, 2012

D Ryan Culkin

Top 15 prospect with Top 4 potential

135, 2013

D Eric Roy

Top 15 prospect with Top 4 potential

164, 2011

G Laurent Brossoit

Top 15 prospect with starting potential

165, 2012

F Coda Gordan

Top 25 prospect with Top 9 potential

157, 2013

F Tim Harrison

Top 20 prospect with Top 9 potential

186, 2012

F Matt DeBlouw

Top 25 prospect with NHL potential

187, 2013

D Rushan Rafikov

Top 15 prospect with Top 4 potential

198, 2013

D John Gilmour

Top 25 prospect with NHL potential

Overall, it’s a very solid group. A gecent mix of talent and depth. Looks like a number of these guys will actually be NHLers one day. Quite the change from the Sutter era.


So why are so many Flames faithful calling for it? My answer is: the way he sometimes handles his business and puts the fans in a crappy spot. Nothing concrete or official, rather little declarations and bold speeches that sometimes put the Flames and their faithful in the cross hairs of critics and trolls league wide. The guarantee that Calgary will make the playoffs? That ridicule lasted right up until Feaster told the world that 21st overall, off the board selection Mark Jonkowski will be the best player to come out of the 2012 Draft. Combine that with the crappy records and underachieving, aging group in Calgary, Flames fans were constant targets for jokes and tease from the rest of the league.

Feaster’s rhetoric aside, his tenure in Calgary began on the wrong foot, mostly because the prior regime bungled things so badly. Only now that he’s been allowed to clear everything out and start fresh will we really get to see what kind of mark he can make on the organization.

    • Captain Ron

      Really thought you did a good job here Christian.

      In looking at the big picture I’m satisfied to this point in the body of work Feaster has done. When a new GM inherits a job from an old one it is usually because the last guy fails and leaves a mess behind. This was certainly the case here with this Flames team when he took over. We are in much better shape now than we were when he took over and to me that’s the thing that matters most when doing the evaluation. For the first time in a long time we can say with out a doubt that there is hope for the future.

      I will however be a little more critical of his work than I have been in the past starting this season and moving forward.

  • TheoForever

    The way I see it, Feaster is a likeable middle of the pack GM without much of an ego.
    B-, is a good grade actually.

    He improved the structure of the organization, hired some good people and lets them do their job. The greatly improved drafting record is the direct reflection of that. (A-)

    Any criticism for not trading Iginla earlier and not embracing a rebuild is ridicules as he was following Edwards orders. Earlier rebuild would have been very difficult due to NTC’s and internal mess.

    Feaster’s trading record is underwhelming in several cases. However, on couple of occasions and with back to the wall the man got some excellent returns. (C+)

    Going after Richards doesn’t make Feaster a bad GM, just same as all the others.

    The near ROR disaster in my book could have been dismissible offense. ( F )
    However, in NHL things work in mysterious ways just look at Philly.

    I have yet to hear anyone suggest appropriate replacement for Feaster.
    And like I said before Burke and former unproven players are not replacements.

    In Feaster we trust, ok maybe not.

  • Captain Ron

    I think this is an admirable job of defending Feaster. I think it falls short though for a number of reasons:

    1. the trades listed are either inconsequential OR ‘cannot be evaluated at this time.’
    2. There is more to a trade than the player going and the player coming back. Timing is a relevant factor.
    3. ROR
    4. Jankowski – sorry but ‘could be a top 6 guy’ and comparing him to the guy picked in the Flames’ draft spot are two fictions. He SHOULD be compared to all available picks at the time. Moreover, we Janko cold potentially still be a top 6F only because he is currently so far out he’s just a long shot either which way. It’s like saying ‘he’s 10 stories high if he’s a foot!!’
    5. What was the purpose of trading Bouwmeester? Why did that need to happen? He was a useful piece on a team that is currently mostly devoid of useful pieces.
    7. Overall, I think you’ve laid out some important points but I’m not convinced.

  • The Last Big Bear

    Allow me to retort:


    The Iginla trade will not be Feaster’s career defining trade. His career defining trade was when he lost one of the worst trades of the decade by shipping out Brad Richards.

    In Feaster’s OWN opinion, one of his best moves was to NOT acquire Vokoun. Instead he went with the worst goaltending stable in the NHL (including a teenaged Karri Ramo), condemned his team to the bottom of the NHL, and created a goaltending void that the franchise is still struggling to fill nearly a decade later. Meanwhile, Vokoun’s recent resume additions include lines like “Usurped the playoff starter position on a cup contending team from a former 1st overall pick who’s a decade younger than me.”

    He lost the Iginla trade. The only qualifier is that it may or may not have been his fault. We don’t know the nitty-gritty details, so we have to give him a bit of a Mulligan on this one.

    He may or may not have lost the Bouwmeester trade, but that deal hinges on the 3rd best goalie in the Swiss league becoming a legit NHLer, so… yeah.

    The Regehr trade was so bad, that a guy writing an article talking about Feaster’s moves as a GM says he doesn’t want to talk about it.

    He *did* win the Langkow for Stempniak trade, though. So there’s that, I guess.


    Feaster tried to pull the trigger on a deal that would have cost the team the 6th overall pick for nothing in return. He also offered Brad Richards eleventy billion dollars on a contract lasting until the end of time and space.

    Now look at the Flames’ roster. There is nothing on that bottom-feeding roster that could ever possibly outweigh either one of those two deals going through.


    His draft record in his previous job was (with not a single word of exaggeration) worse than Maggie the Monkey pointing at a TSN Draft Guide.

    To this very day, the ONLY guy playing in the NHL full time that was drafted by Feaster was the kid on the cover of The Hockey News. There are no full-time NHLers drafted by Feaster other than Stamkos.

    Last year, at a draft where the one thing his team needed more than anything else in the world was to land a sure-thing NHLer, he picked the biggest gamble of the draft.

    None of his draftees with the Flames have done anything of note at the NHL level, so maybe it’s a *LITTLE* bit early to be patting him on the back for the drafting success that he hasn’t had yet. Especially when his prior draft record is so incredibly bad.


    Fire Feaster.

    • BurningSensation

      If you would rather have 28 games of Jarome Iginla in rapid decline than Klimchuk/Hanoswki/Agostino than you are flat out insane. Anyway you cut it the Iginla deal is pure win.

      He’s already won the JBo deal as well, Poirier, Bera and Cundari are worth more to a rebuilding team than JBo and his massive salary are.

      And clearly you are one of the pants-wettiers when it comes to trading down to select Jankowski and Seiloff. Presumably you would have preferred Girgensons – a surefire 3rd liner, instead of a potential 1st liner (albeit with significant risk).

      Me, I prefer a GM who swings for the fences than one who insists on playing it as safe as possible.

      Conclusion – you should change your undergarments and put some big boy underwear on.

      • The Last Big Bear

        1) The only good thing you can say about the Iginla trade is that Feaster’s hands were tied. That may or may not have been his own fault, which is why I give him the benefit of the doubt. But Iginla scored 12 points in 15 playoff games. That’s worth a lot more than a very very late 1st rounder, and a middling prospect (I wont even include Hanowski, who’s all but proven that he will never be an NHLer).

        2) Berra will *probably* be worth absolutely nothing to any NHL team. Cundari is an injury replacement on a basement-dwelling team, and simply not big enough to play his game at an NHL level. Which leaves Poirer. Odds on Poirer being an All-Star, regular Canadian Olympic invite, and leading the NHL in any major statistical category (ala Bouwmeester)?

        3) I absolutely would have preferred Girgensons. I was very vocal about my hopes that the Flames would choose him, well before the draft. I never dreamed Tervainen would still be available, but OBVIOUSLY would have been very happy to see him selected. I’m not sure how that makes me a pants-wetter.

        Conclusion- my underwear has PENGUINS IN CHRISTMAS OUTFITS on it. Your argument is invalid.

        • BurningSensation

          1. Iginla was floated by his linemates throughout the playoffs, and despite a reduction in salary Pittsburgh didn’t want him back. Not to mention that Iginla was one of only two trades to involve a 1st rndr (JBo being the other). Feaster KILLS this deal. Klimchuk has all the hallmarks of being a legit NHL scoring fwd in 3 yeears. Iginla doesn’t. Agostin and Hanowski are pure gravy.

          2. For me Bera and Cundari are the gravy in the deal, the pick that landed Poirier being the meat. If either Bera or Cundari turn out to be full fledged NHL players it’s a win, but realistically the value of this trade lies in Poirier. Flames mgt gave the highest priority on gaining 1st rnd picks, and St Louis offer was the best available that included one. JBO is a very nice talent, and I think grossly under appreciated, but he wasn’t going to bring back the world in a trade (in fact even signing him to a reduced $ cap hit JBo crimped the Blues budget and is part of what forced them to trade Perron for Paajarvi).

          3. I agree that I would have preferred Tervainen over Girgensons, but clearly disagree about Jankowski. Two things; I wonder if there is a type of player that the Flames make sure they DON’T draft in the first round – namely, undersized skill centers. Two drafts running the Flames have skipped around Tervainen and Shinkaruk, players of similar build and skillset. Is it because the Flames scouts don’t project players of the body-type or toolbox to be successful centers? Two, the pants wetting is preferring the conservative lower ceiling player (a Sutter hallmark), over a ‘go for broke’ kid with question marks but high end upside. Feaster even dropped down to get another pick to hedge against the risk he was taking! My biggest disappointment wasn’t Jankowski/Seiloff, it was that Grigorenko almost fell into our lap and Buffalo spiked him. Otherwise, I thought Feaster showed both prudence and balls in making the moves he did.

          4. You have the logo of another franchise on your underwear. Your argument is invalid. Hilarious, and well received, but invalid.

          • Christian Roatis

            Still don’t understand this logic that the Flames somehow had to choose between Girgensons or Jankowski. Makes zero sense.

            Swinging for the fences is fine, but only if you can actually hit the ball while doing so. Just taking wild swings and proclaiming that it’s superior to a bunt and getting on base is just plain wrong.

            Feaster has done nothing special. At all. “Meh,” as I said earlier and that’s just looking at the moves posted by Christian. I never even went into the ROR disaster or his big mouth. For those who still try and support the ROR disaster, just imagine Monahan playing for the Avs right now. Thank goodness Sherman was as dumb as Feaster.

            I like some of the things he’s done organizationally, but as BS points out, he’s yet to steal anything. Langkow was his best trade, but that’s not exactly a steal. Lauding a guy for being at best ‘average’ strains credulity.

            As for comments about who I’d rather see: Hextall, Nill & JD come to mind. Calgary ownership wasn’t ineterested though. They prefer ‘yes men.’

            So while even I defend some of Feaster’s moves, there’s nothing there as a body of work to champion.

            Hilarious, btw, that a guy like Iginla, so fiercely defended by some on here when he wore Flames colors is now so casually thrown under the bus in order to defend a GM of Feaster’s caliber. Truth is, they’re both terrible.

          • RexLibris

            undersized skill centers? Shinkaruk is 100% a winger– I have absolutely no idea where the belief that he’s a center game from (not to mention all the sites that bafflingly have him listed at that position for no apparent reason), since he’s spent his entire WHL career on LW.

            As for Teravainen, he was billed as a scoring RW in his draft year… it was only after the draft that the Blackhawks revealed they intended to convert him to center ice… and I still think he plays wing in the NHL.

          • BurningSensation

            As somebody who saw him play live, I can tell you he was definitely playing center.

            That said, I think that both Tervainen and Shinkaruk will make or break it in the NHL as wingers.

      • RexLibris

        Actually where the Flames win by trading is acquiring a second round pick who seems to be possible top 4 defenseman. If Janko makes the NHL this will be a great move.

  • Christian Roatis

    FN Done Feasting on Feaster?

    I’m delighted to see Feaster defended on this board. He has made mistakes, but has his fair share of accomplishments.

    1) We have two possible #1 goaltenders vs. a Kipper two years from retirement. There are several excellent goalie prospects in the system

    2) He is beginning to rebuild credibility at Centre Ice (Monahan, Knight, Backlund.

    3) He has snared a number of quality late-round draft picks (eg. Gudreau)and rebuilt the prospect stable.

    4) He has the Flames out of “salary cap jail” and still can make a couple of significant pickups for 2013-14 to make a run at the playoffs.

    Not bad in the time he has been here.

    Calgary Candle (Becoming a Feaster Fan)

    • Christian Roatis

      I wouldn’t say FN is done, I think everyone other than me and Rex still dislike Feaster as GM. It’s a miracle this article got past editing 😉

      • Captain Ron

        Rex likes Feaster? When did he have a change of heart? My impression of his feelings toward the man are just the opposite based some of the comments he has made about him. Hasn’t he come out and said he is not a fan of the guy on more than one occasion?

          • RexLibris

            I’m not a fan of Feaster, no. My criticism of him isn’t personal, I think he is someone who devotes himself to his job and believes that he is making the best choices for the organization.

            He has a law degree and is educated, and I respect those accomplishments.

            He has also won a Stanley Cup, the same number of championships as Brian Burke and Ray Shero as GMs.

            All that aside, I do not believe that he necessarily speaks with as much personal honesty, though perhaps with sincerity. That is, he is honest in speaking what he believes, but perhaps is not as honest with himself about those same beliefs as he could be. This brings us back to intellectual honesty, but I think we’ve talked that topic to death. Its a minor distinction, and entirely opinion, but nevertheless, his history would seem to suggest something like it.

            He has a penchant for hyperbole and combative language that may be a trademark of his legal training, but does not translate well to the public sphere and now only serves to further undermine his credibility. It can put undue onus on the player and is irresponsible in crafting expectations.

            Being educated and even accomplished in your field does not, necessarily, make oneself a truly intelligent individual, and certainly does not inherently equip one for all matters of management. I am not willing to take for granted that his having a law degree necessarily makes him one of the smartest men in NHL managerial circles. Feaster has some abilities that relate to the world of business, of that I have no doubt. However, I have not seen any evidence that those skills extend to the world of sports management.

            I would rate Jay Feaster as one of the worst GMs in the NHL right now. He is one of the last managers I would ever choose to have in control of a franchise entering into a rebuilding period. I know that is harsh, but I’ve taken a very long look at his career before coming to this conclusion and it doesn’t matter one bit what team he works for, so local sentiments are not a factor in this belief.

            For the record, Mike Gillis, Steve Tambellini, and perhaps Glen Sather would round out the current and recent GMs at the bottom of the list. I’m not convinced that Garth Snow has made any significant steps forward, but we shall see in due time. I also recognize that the difference between a good GM and a bad one is narrower margin than likely many of us have in our professions.

            I did defend Feaster’s trade of Iginla, but that was recognizing that he really didn’t have many, if any, options and did himself a favour by structuring a deal around a 1st round pick in return.

            Again, and I must emphasize this last point, this is in no way a personal attack on the man. He may be the kindest soul in the business today and I intend no slight to him personally. I only offer my honest and researched opinion on his abilities as a General Manager of an NHL team.

            Sorry for the polemic, but I didn’t want anyone mistaking my comments as being a personal attack or springing from local rivalries.

          • RexLibris

            Yeah, sorry again for the length of the reply. It wasn’t really directed solely at you, but I’ve been critical of Feaster for some time now and figured I should clarify my stance and reasoning behind it. Don’t take any of it personally. =)

            As for my loyalties, I’d better answer that one before everyone else chimes in. I’m an Oiler fan. Always have been.

            That said, when I comment or write on the Flames I take that hat off and offer, what I hope, is an objective and sometimes empathetic perspective on the franchise. I’m not an Edmonton apologist nor a troll, just someone interested in the state of other NHL franchises.

            I understand your defense of Jay Feaster, as he has made moves that would not have been seen under Darryl Sutter and the change in direction, with a focus on acquiring young talent, is probably music to the ears of many fans.

            I listed Tambellini as one of the worst GMs in the league during his time in Edmonton, but I also credited him with some positive steps: rebuilding the development system, prioritizing the draft while refusing to trade prospects or picks for marginal improvements, signing Hall to a very good long term contract, and willingness to open up the management of the team to some analytical input.

            That being said, he also came a whisker away from trading for Dany Heatley, supported the pick of Cameron Abney and others like him, fell asleep at the switch last season when Horcoff, Belanger and Lander all went down to injury, and then traded away picks for Fistric and Brown. He was a very poor manager whose single most redeeming feature was that his extreme patience and caution prevented any talent from walking out the door. Unfortunately, it also prevented some of it from entering.

            Anyway, this was a good piece, and it looks like there was a lot of research in putting together all of the pieces of Feaster’s Flames portfolio-to-date.

          • The Last Big Bear

            “[Jay Feaster] has made moves that would not have been seen under Darryl Sutter and the change in direction… ”

            I don’t really get this part. Feaster didn’t come in as the champion of the rebuild. He was dragged into the rebuild kicking and screaming, while desperately throwing big contracts left and right at 30+ year old players like Ryan Smyth and Brad Richards.

            Darryl Sutter mortgaged the future to try and win the cup during the window of his star players, Iginla, and Kiprusoff. That was the right thing to do at the time. It didn’t work, but it was still the right thing to do.

            The notions that Feaster would have done anything much differently, or that Sutter wouldn’t be rebuilding now if he were still in place, are completely baseless.

          • Christian Roatis

            In 2006 trying to win the cup made sense to most of us and maybe again in 2007 after that it was Sutter’s ego and above that failed to realize that something different needed to be done. Sutter drafting and trades did not help his team in the short run of in the future as the game had changed. Let’s remember we came out of nowhere in 2004 for the run we did. ( we as a fan base and the owners gave Sutter, Iggie and Kipper the keys to the city after that) Even then we did not have the depth to remain a contender. Sutter’s insistence on drafting “character WHL” guys over more skilled players has hurt this organization deeply. Attack Feaster sure; keep his feet to the fire awesome, let everyone of us make sure we keep the organization accountable; the Sutter era should have taught all of us not to have blinders on. If we look at all the best franchises over the last decade or so how many of them have changed coaches and GM’s like we have. (they have kept people even during the lean years)

          • piscera.infada

            “Darryl Sutter mortgaged the future to try and win the cup during the window of his star players, Iginla, and Kiprusoff. That was the right thing to do at the time. It didn’t work, but it was still the right thing to do.”

            I actually tend to agree. I think Sutter was doing what he needed to at the time. Whether the team was as good as all the pundits seemed to think at the time of the Jokinen (first time), Bouwmeester, Cammi, etc. pick-ups is irrelevant. This team thought it was time to win with the Iginla’s, Regher’s, and Kipper’s of the world. Thus, I’m not sure we can really fault Sutter as much as we do for “mortgaging the future”.

            This, however does not mean Feaster wasn’t dealt a crap hand when he took over. Not only did he have to deal with what I can only imagine was an emasculated staff, but also a coaching staff that was a decade behind and hired purely to keep the team within the family.

            I don’t want to come off as a Feaster apologist – I agree with you on point that he was dragged into this rebuild despite his best efforts. On the other hand though, I actually like what he’s done since (granted, small sample size) he’s been thrown into the deep end, and I find myself starting to agree with his rhetoric since ownership has accepted that it’s time.

            As such, I give Feaster a bit of a pass for what he did when this organization was coming apart at the seams because let’s face it, that’s exactly what was happening. He was trying to hold it together (at all costs) as it slowly, but surely unraveled. We can sit here and say we all saw it coming, that this or that should or shouldn’t have happened – and that’s all well and good – but I also think it might be pragmatic to judge Feaster based on what he does in this “new world”, before we jump down his throat any more than we already have.

  • Captain Ron

    Years from now we will see more clearly how much Feaster improved this organization.

    He inherited a sinking ship and did a good job of repairing it.

    I only hope an article like this will enlighten some because I’ve grown tired of all the Feaster hate.

    He is a smart GM and I truly believe he is one of the best in the league.

    TB was a learning experience and he has greatly improved his managing since taking the helm here.

    • T&A4Flames

      Agreed. It doesn’t hurt that CGY offers him resources (money) that the TBL organization couldn’t or didn’t. He’s put together a solid group of managers and scouts etc that compliment his strengths and weaknesses.

      Maybe not the best GM, but certainly not as bad as has been declared here in some comments.

  • please cancel acct

    you flamers are missing the big picture. and kurt, i would have expected you would recognize this. indeed the flames could have started this rebuild several years ago and feaster has done a masterful job, through his arrogant insistance that he will not “copy” edmonton, in masking his intentions. realize this though. your team is a couple of 2014 trade deadline dumps away from icing i would say far and away the worst roster in the league in 2014-15 and being the front runners for generational talent conner mcdavid. i believe you guys are a draft lottery away from drafting the best player since crosby.

    or maybe i am giving feaster too much credit and he bumbled his way into it. either way….

    • Captain Ron

      Some of us here hope you are right…..about being 2014-2015 front runners for McDavid. Frankly after the last 20 years around here we think we deserve that prize if it happens.

  • Clyde Frog

    Firstly looking at trades of actual NHL players for “Magic Beans” especially in the form of late 1st rounders requires an understanding that your GM has 100% gone into rebuild mode.

    Secondly it requires a further understanding that you just lost a productive roster player for the chance at a player in 2-5 years. This player may eclipse your current one, but has almost an equal chance to not even make the NHL roster at any point…

    If Feaster had accepted the roster and performance deficiencies earlier, he could have seen a much greater return in prospects with an actual chance to step into the NHL roster.

    He didn’t, he twiddled his thumbs until the shine wore off Iginla. He waited for the press to shout from the rooftops Jarome’s discontent and for the market to essentially collapse.

    That’s the issue with measuring Feaster’s performance, telling yourself again and again that he forced an amazing return out of Pittsburgh requires you to:

    A. Terribly undervalue actual NHL players versus prospects with a big shiny future and a small chance of cracking an NHL roster

    B.Completely forget he could have made moves much earlier for actual NHL pieces that could have helped your roster then and today

    But hey if the new measure of GM success is repeating the mantra,”We will be good in 2 years, just you wait!”

    Well then I guess Feaster has started to look not bad.

  • TheRealPoc

    Subtract Sieloff, Jankowski and Poirier from that list, and replace them just with Shinkaruk and Teravainen/Hertl. 3 for 2.

    I’d argue we’d have the best prospect pipeline in the entire league if that were the case.

    • Jeff Lebowski

      At the end if the day, who cares what the ranking or industry opinion is (except the situation of a trade of a prospect) of the prospect pool?

      What matters is how many players develop and PLAY in the NHL. Sure, it’s nice to see prospects tracking well but if they hit the skids before becoming legit ‘players’ the ‘sexiness’ factor means nothing.

      Perhaps those other guys do make it compared to Calgary’s kids but until that happens the rhetoric is just that. With those other guys, if they make it at all it’s going to have to be as top 6. Small, slight guys who don’t produce (and don’t do anything else like agitate) don’t play.

      The point is, nothing can be concluded yet. Time will tell.

      I have faith in Feaster. He has made mistakes but he seems to be a guy who reflects on them in order to improve. So for me, it’s the next move I look at not what happened in the past.

  • Clyde Frog

    why does everyone consider 5’10 and 5’11 to be “undersized”? there were more than 250 players last year that were under 6’0, including the best in the game

    • BurningSensation

      I was merely asking the question about whether or not Tervainen and Shikaruk fall in Flames scouts eyes because they have the wrong size/build by some metric the scouts are using.

      It could just be a coincidence that both got passed over, and that they have similar builds/ skillsets.