An Open Letter To Curtis Glencross



Dear Curtis Glencross,



Flames fans.

I’m being told I need to delve deeper into this, so I guess that’s what I’ll do.

In reference to this interview you gave, Mister Glencross, the one where you’re talking about working on a contract extension now for some reason, the one where you go on record saying you’re not willing to play for a hometown discount? That one? Yes, we the undersigned have a few issues with it, and if it’s okay with you, we’d like to go over them in some detail? Good? Good.



We’re all aware of what you’re doing, Curtis, and it’s a pretty smart move if you ask me. Your contract is up at the end of the season, and you and your agent are being proactive out there on trying to get a new contract out of the team. That makes sense. They haven’t talked to you yet, so you talk to them.

But your timing, my friend, is off. Consider the mind of Brad Treliving like a warm, delicious pie. Do you see pie in your head right now? Yeah? Me too. I’m also very much craving pie right now, but let’s focus on the task at hand. If you cut the pie that is Bred Treliving’s brain into pieces, you’ll see the individual sections are of unequal size. These slices are Treliving’s priorities. The big pieces, you’ll see are as follows: 

The medium sized pieces are all about getting RFA’s (Joe Colborne, Lance Bouma, Joni Ortio) all locked up. Which leaves the smaller pieces of the pie for Treliving:

This is not to say that signing you is not a priority, or that it’s not important, because it is. You just need to wait your turn, pal. It’s not time yet. And this is potentially, a very good thing for you, if you play your cards right, because of value.



There’s one part of your interview that really struck a chord with me, Curtis, and I think it’s worth repeating:

“It’ll be a little bit different this time around,” Glencross explained. “I told them when we did the last deal that I love playing at home and I’ll take kind of a hometown discount hit so we could make this team a better team.

“I might only have a couple more contracts left in my career, and this is probably the biggest contract of my career. The Flames have to know that as well, and hopefully they take it into consideration, what I did the last four years.”

Okay, look, there’s no doubt that your current contract is one of the best values in the NHL. After you signed that deal in 2011, it was mere months before we saw players nowhere near as good as you get richer with some pretty madcap and wacky deals, and it wasn’t cool. When you’re on your game, you are a fine hockey player. You’re not a huge possession driver, but you’re not a liability either, and when you’re in the lineup, you put up points. In a full season, we can probably reasonably expect you to be a ~45 point guy with a shooting percentage in the 15% range. That’s not bad. That’s good second line stuff.

But let’s face the facts. You said it yourself, you probably only have a couple of contracts left to sign (I would say it’s more than that, because towards the end of your career, I suspect you’ll only be re-upping for one year at a time until we all retire and die). You’re going to be 32 years old when your contract expires this year, and we know what that means. You’re still a young man, sure, but as a hockey player, you’re on the brink of twilight, and you’re never in that point of your career where you’re ever going to get better. Players regress, and the way you play the game, Curtis, you’re not going to be any different. It’s a punishing style, and you’re not the kind of guy who lurks around on the periphery looking for the fast break. You’re more an Iginla than a Selanne. And that catches up with you eventually.

Which is why you’ve never skated through a full season. Injuries always happen, and I don’t think the term “injury prone” is actually a thing at all. I’d suggest playing a full season in the NHL takes a good degree of luck. It’s a random game, and at it’s heart it’s a violent game, to come away unscathed is hard to do. What I would say, is that you have bad luck. It’s hard to justify paying a full season’s worth of work when you’re only around for half of it.

Which is not to say you won’t rebound and have a lush, full season where you play the finest hockey of your life. That’s entirely possible, just much more implausible. 

Which is why you should use this season as your resume for the contract you’re going to sign at the end of this season. It would be swell if the Flames recognized that you took a healthy hometown discount on your last pact, and that it’s very clear that Southern Alberta is where your heart is, but at the same time, it’s a business, and it’s ill advised to go around signing players to legacy contracts if they’re going to also be expensive. You’re as aware of this racket as anyone, as you’re willing to go to the open market to get more money in a city you don’t necessarily want to be in (because who would ever want to live in Buffalo? Yech).

If you were to rebound from last year and be the Glencross we all know and tolerate love (and maybe decreased the amount of flagrantly stupid penalties you’re wont to take), then would we all be smitten kittens if you inked a 2-3 year deal worth 3.5 million a year? I’d say that’s very fair for someone in your position. It’s not as if you’re really able to hold the team hostage over this – there’s not a lot of depth on this team, but at LW it’s stronger organizationally than any other roster spot – so how much leverage do you really have?

Not to say you don’t bring a lot of value to the Flames, Curtis, because you really do, but it’s not cool to be a veteran forward who offers all the “intangibles” and “clutchiness” to his team but can’t stay in the lineup due to injuries and commands a 5 million dollar a year contract. I know that sounds crazy, but I swear to Lanny’s Mustache I’ve heard that one before.

Don’t go full Bolland, Curtis. (Even if it would play out a hunch of mine)

Play the season out. Take a step back and assess where the team is heading and how you fit into it. Wait and see how the Brodie and Backlund negotiations go. Wait to see how the market shakes itself out. Become the market, and earn that next contract. Or earn that next bigger one somewhere else. Trying to win the big ticket right now before training camp even opens is your weakest move.


rational people

  • Jeremy

    I’ve never been a fan of GlenX….I only hope he stays healthy and has a productive enough year to increase his trade value. I would not resign him unless it’s a sign ‘n’ trade

  • Jeremy

    Lets be honest, this is a team that has a ton of left wingers. Many on the cusp of the NHL. Glencross is a progress killer for a number of them (Baertschi).
    Curtis needs to be traded ASAP. Even if it’s at the deadline he must be sold off for an asset . His future is on a contending team, getting a low second round pick for the Flames.
    Hopefully the team deals him before he gets hurt again this year

    • FeyWest

      I only think we need to resort to this if the young guns can push him down the depth chart come training camp. He does provide Veteran Leadership and is a good 2nd line LWer when he’s Scoreface.

      If we do re-sign him I feel it’s only going to be a 1-2 year deal because I don’t think he fits into the long-term plans and right now he at least provides a decent buffer for the young guys. I like Glenny so it’s hard for me to say that but we do have to look towards the next couple years when we start our ascension. *Edit* of course this all hinges on this years training camp and start of season performance.

  • I think it would be foolish to extend him. If he gets off to a good start trade his ass while he still has a value contract. We need to be building for the future and GlenX is turning into what some would call a “post-apex” player.

  • Glen X is a pretty good guy and can help us offensively, however, the reality is that he’s never scored more than 26 goals in a season and has never hit 50 points in his career. Last season he probably could have hit some career highs had he not been injured. If BT is true to his word, he should not give Glencross more than 2-3 years max. But my guess is that Curtis wants 4-5 years with a NTC. If he plays well and the Flames can’t meet his contract demands then they should trade him. They didn’t trade Cammy and we lost him for nothing, I don’t want the same thing to happen for Glencross.

  • I’d be okay considering a Glencross extension if he didn’t struggle so badly last year. His first-10 games were flat out awful. His overall underlying numbers were mediocre (to be kind).

    If he returns to form this season, maybe the team can think about keeping him around. If not, then not.

  • Colin.S

    BT/BB should talk to Curtis and explain the merits of being traded to a contender if what he wants is a big fat contract next. He’s not gonna get that playing with the flames this year. He won’t play on a line with Gaudreau/Hudler who will probably be the Flames top scorers since they all play LW and with Gaudreau/Hudler, GlennX might be playing as a 3rd line LW to.

    Quite honestly if I were BB/BT after that interview and seeing his desire is a big fat pay cheque I’d be looking to trade him now, preferably for an “A” defensive prospect.

  • McRib

    As much as I love what Curtis Glencross has done for the community, I wish we would have traded him two free agent deadline days ago, when 26+ teams were inquiring about his services.

    Dear Mr. Treliving, Let this serve as a reminder, in the future when 20+ teams want a slightly above average replacement player from us and are willing to overpay sustainably to get him in a bidding war, don’t deny them of that right!!!

    Let’s face it Curtis Glencross will retire in Calgary like every other Western Canadian who played for us. However, I would actually like for us to trade him at the deadline this year and then for him to sign a huge contract as a UFA with another team during next years offseason (he deserves to get paid!!!).

    If Sven Baertschi shows up to camp this year like he should have last year, I wouldn’t even mind trading Glenny this year mid-season. Curtis Glencross is a Chris Kunitz lite and will always be better served playing in a good situation with skilled teammates, elevating his game to their level he cannot drive the bus on his own!!!

  • PrairieStew

    Cowpie Curtis. You’ve stepped in it. Lots of guys ready to take your place in the next couple of years. An experienced ranch hand like yourself is always welcome but might not be in the outfit’s best interest over the long cattle drive.

  • McRib

    I have never read an FN article where everyone is as 100% on the same page and unanimously agees as much as the consensus of this article, obviously the fans have spoken Mr. Treliving!!

    Curtis Glencross deserves to get paid by someone other than Calgary!! Nice Work Loob (you can go back to Sweden again for another couple of months, until the season).

  • supra steve

    Thing is, the Flames could easily afford to repay Curtis’ loyalty quite generously on a 1-2 year extension, that is if they really feel that they owe it to him (not sure what handshake agreement may have occurred between Curtis and KK).

    I’m not saying that they should, just that they could. Cause really, his current deal hasn’t paid him nearly enough.

  • piscera.infada

    As much as I love what Curtis Glencross has done for the community, I wish we would have traded him two free agent deadline days ago, when 26+ teams were inquiring about his services.

    Dear Mr. Treliving, Let this serve as a reminder, in the future when 20+ teams want a slightly above average replacement player from us and are willing to overpay sustainably to get him in a bidding war, don’t deny them of that right!!!

    Ever considered that Flames management asked him to waive his NMC (considering there were really that many offers) and he refused? I mean really, he took a drastic pay-cut to stay close to home. In fact, I imagine that’s exactly what happened. That said, if there is a year he decides to waive it, it will be this year towards the deadline. Then, he’s free to sign wherever. If the Flames don’t offer him the term and/or dollars he wants (which is very likely), then you’ll get your wish.

  • Parallex

    The bottom line to the Glencross situation is that he is still of value to the organization. And its up to the organization to do what is right, for it and for the player.

    This is a guy who would stay, but would rightfully expect to be paid market to stay. I have no argument with that, particularly with the cap situation here.

    As well, this is a player who would be of value on the ice, as I firmly believe that a full season, uninjured Scoreface would chalk up 20-25 goals with any of the centres this team can ice. That said, he is value in a Flames uniform as well as of value as a bargaining chip in trade discussions now through to the trade deadline.

    And I believe that BT will do the right thing, for the organization and this player.

  • The Last Big Bear

    1) Glencross is an excellent hockey player.

    2) He hates the Oilers.

    3) He scored a hat trick against the Oilers in one of their franchise’s most humiliating games of all time.

    4) He did a huge favour for the team and took a big pay cut when the Flames needed the cap space, he should get a big payday now that they don’t.

    5) This is exactly the kind of thing the organisation should be encouraging. If you take a deep pay cut for a no-trade clause, you’re a Flame for the duration, no questions asked. None of this “Give out an NTC and ask you to waive it two seasons later” nonsense.

    6) Glencross probably has 3-ish years of good NHL-level hockey left in the tank, and his current contract will use up one of them.

    7) $5m x 3 years, or $4m x 4 years, with an ‘NTC is a fair deal. He could get more on the open market, both sides know this. He wants to stay in Calgary, and both sides know this too. This deal would see him handsomely paid, even though he will be past his “Best Before” date for the last year or two. I’m fine with that.

    8) Oilers suck.

  • loudogYYC

    With Glencross not being able to stay healthy for a full season I don’t see the point in waiting till October or later to trade him. Different story if he was a RW of course.

    I wonder if Glencross alone would be enough to get Coburn out of Philly.