What Is Lance Bouma Worth?

With Mark Cundari and Joe Colborne signed last week, forward Lance Bouma is Calgary’s last remaining off-season loose end. The 24-year-old forward is a restricted free agent, and arguably of all of Calgary’s RFAs has the best case for a raise based on how well he played last season.

In the interest of shining a light on why #17 hasn’t yet re-signed, here’s a brief look at what the Calgary Flames, and what Bouma’s representatives, probably think he’s worth.

Lance Bouma had a three-year entry-level deal that saw him have an annual NHL average salary of $563,333 – a smidge above NHL minimum wage. He played 43 games in Calgary in the first two seasons, putting up four points in an energy role and generally looking like a player that could take Tom Kostopoulos’ bottom-six role on the left-side. (He also played 92 games in Abbotsford, earning 26 points). Bouma seemed poised to earn a full-time NHL job…and then the lock-out happened. And then his knee exploded, resulting in surgery on two different ligaments, a lot of rehab and just three AHL games played. He was given a one-year, two-way deal worth $577,500 at the NHL level, and the hope was that he would work his way back to what he was prior to his knee injury.

But Bouma worked his tail off in rehab and, despite the fact that you could forgive him for being tentative given his injury history, he played with the same reckless abandon for the Flames last season that he did prior to his injury. In fact, you could argue that Bouma was even better than he was prior to the injury, something that could be explained by the fact that he basically lived in Calgary’s video room throughout last season.

Bouma had 15 points in 78 games for the Flames, but he was second among all NHL forwards in blocked shots and was tied with Matt Stajan among all Flames forwards in per-game penalty-kill ice-time. In short, Bouma carved out a very effective little niche for himself, moving up from fourth line duty with Brian McGrattan and a rotating cast of characters to spending time on a regular basis with Matt Stajan on whichever line Stajan was on at the time. Prior to some injury problems for the right-winger, Bob Hartley threw Bouma on a line with Stajan and David Jones that was pretty effective.

So what is a defensively-sound, physical forward that can play all three positions and eat up time on the penalty kill worth?


If I’m the Flames, I’m focusing on age and experience comparables – players 23 to 26 who are just out of their entry-level years. The idea isn’t so much to downplay Bouma’s abilities, but to make sure his compensation falls within the internal salary structure – as in, if the Flames are gonna be a good team, they need to pay Bouma comparable to how good teams pay players of his abilities and experience.

121 19 TBA
Josefson (NJ) 118 25 $800,000
Rinaldo (Phi) 165 18 $750,000
Frattin (Tor) 126 35 $800,000
Sestito (Van) 134 17 $750,000
Tangradi (Wpg) 136 15 $675,000
Lander (Edm) 94 8 $600,000

Most of these guys are young, completely useful role players, but none of ’em are well-known for their scoring touch. Based upon this grouping, you’d expect the Flames to offer Bouma around $800,000 or so.

The big reason? Look at the salary structure of good teams like Chicago and Los Angeles: you have a handful of players making top money (between $6 and $10 million if you’re Chicago), then a lesser group in the middle-range, and then role players making south of $1.5 million. That means that if Bouma’s “only” going to be a role player – and you need role players to win – he’ll top out at $1.5 million per year.

The Flames are not a good team yet, but you can’t begrudge them for trying to institute a similar internal salary structure so when everyone gets slotted into their respective roles, their compensation is logical and comparable across the club.


I brought up Brandon Bollig’s deal before, and it’s still probably unfair because the Flames didn’t sign that deal, but it’s there. So now you have Brandon Bollig making $1.25 million and Joe Colborne making $1.275 million.

The Colborne comparison is probably the important one, since both he and Bouma played their first full season in the NHL last year and were used differently. Colborne averaged 12:35 in even-strength TOI, 1:24 in power-play TOI and 0:15 in short-handed TOI. He had 28 points in 80 games and outside of a few games early in his tenure as a center, he was protected a lot and got good ice-time with some strong line-mates like Jiri Hudler and Sean Monahan. He did emerge as a shootout specialist and was pretty reliable for goals now and then.

Bouma? 10:21 at even-strength (a bit less), 0:13 on the PP (also less) and 2:01 short-handed, which is a lot more. He scored less than Colborne, putting up 15 points in 78 games, but he was also used more in defensive deployments and to eat up tougher minutes (with usually lesser line-mates). The short-handed thing is actually key here, as he was tied with Matt Stajan for average ice-time among forwards on the PK, and was basically out on-average for one of every three minutes on the PK. He also was second in the entire NHL among forwards in shot-blocking.

In other words, Bouma’s a role player, but he’s a useful and important role player – one of the club’s best penalty-killers and their key forward shot-blocker. And you could argue he’s (at times) as crucial to Calgary’s success as Colborne is, so he should be making close to Colborne money.

Team Bouma is probably looking at team-specific role players (e.g., guys as important to their teams as he is) when looking at comparables. I’d look at Matt Beleskey ($1.4 million), Matt Calvert ($1.125 million), Kyle Clifford ($1.2 million), Dale Wiese ($1.025 milllion) and Matt Martin ($1.1 million) as comparables on this basis.


The fact that Bouma hasn’t signed yet is probably just a reflection that there’s a bit of disagreement between his camp and the Flames regarding what he’s worth. He’s probably worth between $750,000 and $1.1 million, depending on how important you think shot-blocking is and how important you think goals and points are, and whether his representation can convince Calgary’s management that one pretty good year is representative of what Bouma will be going forward.

My guess is he signs a one or two-year bridge deal worth $850,000 or so a year. It hedges bets for both sides, and potentially gives Bouma a chance to show he can score more and make some big bucks next time.

  • piscera.infada

    @redricardo @Parallex

    I agree with you re: blocked shots in almost all situations. Bouma is kind of the exception in my mind. He wasn’t a huge shot blocker at 5v5 in my mind – which is where yes, shot blocking is not conducive to moving the puck forward. However, the shots I remember him blocking are of the “game-saving variety” fairly often; last few seconds of the game, big penalty-kills, that kind of thing. We can argue circular logic like “shot-blocks” are never a good thing. But sometimes you need a guy that’s going to do that (and do it well) when it matters. So while I agree with you that Smid constantly being in his own zone, so shots hit him is not a good thing in and of itself, I don’t think you can completely discount Bouma’s contribution to the team in the same vein.

    I’ll leave you with one of my personal favourites, to explain kind of what I mean. And no, I’m not saying “Bouma is Ryan Callahan” obviously…

  • Bean-counting cowboy

    Interview with Conroy on the Fan was telling. The issues are basically what Pike has framed here; Calgary wants Bouma to show them he can do it for on more year while he will still have RFA status. Booms camp thinks he is worth more and perhaps looking for this contract to stretch him to UFA status.

  • Lordmork

    I think it’s great if the Flames are being cautious about salaries (Engelland aside), even when they have oodles of cap space, because it bodes well for the future. That said, I think Bouma’s dedication to improvement, even while he was injured, is worth a raise.

    My preference would be to sign him to the bridge deal. That way, he’ll still be an RFA (as I understand it), by which time he’ll hopefully be worth a bigger payout and a longer contract. He’s also the kind of player I hope the Flames will go out of their way to fill the 4th line with.

  • redricardo

    Good article Ryan, I like the approach of showing both perspectives.

    For me, blocked shots isn’t a positive stat. Saying someone had a lot of blocked shots is just saying they never have the puck or drive possession. It’s like saying someone had the worst +/- on his team, but people view it as a positive thing. It boggles my mind.

    That being said, Bouma had a lot of PK time, and relative boat anchors for linemates for big chunks of the season.

    Does anyone have Bouma’s advanced stats? What can we realistically expect moving forward? Is he a guy that can drive the play at even strength with half decent linemates?

    • Don’t agree on the blocked shots. Seem to recall many came on the PK and some shifts where he had 2-3 blocked shots on the same shift. The possession I get, but his line mates have a lot to do with that as well.

      Bouma’s biggest problem re: contract is that there are probably 3-4 prospects waiting in the wings that can provide a similar role, AND provide some offensive spark (Arnold, Agostino…). The Flames are probably caught between wanting to reward him for the good season last year and not tying their wagon to someone they’ll likely be wanting to upgrade within the next year or two.

    • Parallex

      Lance Bouma Advanced Stats: CF%: 43.5% CF% rel: -3.6% PDO: 99.7 QoC: 28.0% QoT: 29.0% Zone Start% O/N/D: 24.4%/36.9%/38.8%

      From: http://www.extraskater.com/player/1095/lance-bouma


      Completely argee about blocked shot’s they’re not a really a stat that demostrates something positive about the player… they’re not strictly “good” they’re simply the lesser evil. He’s is a decent PK’er (at least that’s what the eye test told me)… a fourth liner that can effectively kills penalties has some value since that let’s the better players have more minutes at evs and on the PP. In regards to what Bouma should get paid I would error more towards the lesser amount, he’s a decent fourth line guy but he’s still just a fourth line guy so pay him fairly for that… I would say less then Bollig but more then McGrattan.

  • piscera.infada

    I assume the disagreement is more term versus dollars. I would expect they’re anywhere between a 1 and 4 year term with the organization falling on the lower end. For me, if you’re Bouma, you know you’re likely never going to put up the offensive numbers to truly demand more. You’re number one priority is probably job security.