Travis Hamonic requests trade, preferably to western Canada

Travis Hamonic is a 25-year-old right-shooting defenceman who already has 342 NHL games under his belt. Selected 53rd overall by the New York Islanders, he’s found a home there – a home he apparently wants out of, for undisclosed personal reasons.

And he wants to go to western Canada.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Hey, Calgary is in western Canada!

Here’s the deal: Hamonic is a very good player. He plays in the Islanders’ toughest situations, and he’s a positive possession player. Take a gander at how the Islanders used him through 2014-15, via War on Ice:

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

isles-d-2014-15

He faced the second toughest zone starts next to Brian Strait, and he played top competition – all at the age of 24. He’s being used in a similar position this season, as well. Though he isn’t getting the toughest competition or zone starts through the first quarter of 2015-16, he’s still up there when it comes to difficult circumstances played, and his possession numbers are currently the best on the Islanders’ defence.

And again: he’s only 25 years old. Hamonic has just three assists through 19 games this season, but he is coming off of a career high 33 point season, and he’s not going to keep shooting at 0% forever. He also takes on an average of 23 minutes a night, which are top pairing minutes.

He’s locked up pretty cheap, too. Hamonic’s cap hit is a mere $3.857 million for the next five seasons. You know how T.J. Brodie is already on a steal of a deal? Hamonic’s is even better.

In short: he’s a player you want on your team. And with Calgary being on his list, he’s a guy the Flames should absolutely be going after; if not for themselves, then to stop one of their rivals from getting him.

What would he cost?

Here’s the problem: Hamonic is not going to come cheap. We’re talking about a very young, talented defender. Just because he’s on the market doesn’t mean the Islanders can be fleeced over.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

What would you want in return for T.J. Brodie? Because those are essentially the levels we’re talking about here. And according to Elliotte Friedman, the Islanders aren’t interested in picks or prospects. They want good, NHL-level players.

Brodie himself is almost certainly not on the table, and I’d venture to say the Flames aren’t interested in giving up on Dougie Hamilton considering their investment in him (he’s also younger, and is just starting to turn the corner in Calgary). If the Islanders are willing to take a quality forward, Sean Monahan, Johnny Gaudreau, and Sam Bennett are probably off the table as well.

Everyone else, though? Why not?

Here’s a thought: how about Jiri Hudler? He’s coming off the best season of his career, and even though he hasn’t had the best start to this season, he’s still on-pace for 50+ points. He’s a quality, if depreciating, asset.

The depreciating part is a problem, though. Hudler is 31 years old, and an upcoming unrestricted free agent who’s going to be looking to cash in. He’s still a good player, but he’s pretty much the opposite of what Hamonic is: declining, and expensive.

Here’s another, potentially more blasphemous thought: how about Mark Giordano?

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Giordano has been struggling to start this season, but he’s not far removed from back-to-back Norris-worthy campaigns. He’s been signed long-term, so there’s no risk of him bolting, even though he’ll be a bit more expensive (nearly double Hamonic’s cap hit). The same reasons the Flames may be interested in dealing him, though – the fact that he may not be worth his cap hit as he ages and inevitably declines – may be the reason the Islanders would be wary of trading for him.

But they’re conversation starters. If the Flames are going to acquire Hamonic, it’s going to cost them. But to have a 25-year-old T.J. Brodie, a 22-year-old Dougie Hamilton, and a 25-year-old Travis Hamonic on the same blueline? It would be worth it.


  • Byron Bader

    Jeez lots of support for trading Gio. He hasn’t looked himself but it’s 20 games in. If Gio is doing the early season Norris thing how good does that deal look?

    Wouldn’t mind getting this guy to round out the top four but ultimately Ras,OK, Morrison and/or Hickey should fill that need.

    • EhPierre

      I think the reason why majority of ppl are on board for trading Gio is cuz he IS having a bad early season. Yes its early but inevitably, Gio is gonna get worse as time progresses. Might as well get a younger, CHEAPER defenseman who won’t decline as quickly as Gio (hopefully not for Hamonic’s sake anyways)

      But if Tre is okay with trading Gio, I think we can get a better return from another team

  • ronipedia

    If we did trade Brodie, I wonder how many fans would be excited over a return that consisted of a small, 31 year old slumping winger looking for a raise and a 3rd pairing D man? Seriously, I feel like I’m reading trade proposals from TO fans.

    I agree with BS. The Oilers have more chips to play in this game than Calgary does and are stupid if they don’t go after him hard.

    • Willi P

      Totally agree.

      PC has already proven he will over pay to NY. Look at the panic deal he made for Griffin Reinhart.

      The Oil will give up way more than the Flames will spend to get this guy. It will make their team worse in the long run. I see them giving up Yak or Eberle AND one of their good young D, Klef or Nurse.

      Way too steep.

      • SSB1963

        Why would you give up Nurse or Klefbom? Nurse will be more dynamic in the long run and Klefbom is signed for a reasonable amount for the long term and is a good comparable. I just don’t think the Oilers will give up the D-Man that the Isle want back in return.

        • Willi P

          Not saying I would do it. As per my comment about PC, I think he is desperate to land at least a #3 Dman considering the Oil are loaded with 4-7 guys. I think he will pay more than anybody else. I see a deal like Klefbom and Yak going one way and Hamonic and Okposo coming back. Just my opinion though.

          • Kevin R

            Agreed. I see them offer Yakapoo for him & based on 1st overall pedigree, Islanders may be tempted. Flames have to offer them something that would help them immediate. Problem is UFA’s may not get it done. Russell may be trashed regularly since the season started, but his block shot ability is coveted. Would people freak out if we offer Russell & Backlund, who is on a pretty decent contract himself, work?

            People can’t just compare returns expected if we decided to put Brodie on the market. Islanders have limited teams to trade with & it is public that the player requested a trade. The return is not going to be the same as if we were offering Brodie to 29 other teams. I think Russell & Backlund could certainly help the Islanders. I don’t think I would want to add much more to that package either.

          • Bean-counting cowboy

            Still, he doesn’t have to trade him. And he has all season. The pressure is really not all that great.

            Also, depending on who you ask, Hamonic is either a top pairing D or a 2nd pairing D or a top pairing D playing on the 2nd pairing. It’d be nice to know the real scoop.

            What we do know: he’s their best shutdown, provides reasonable offence on top of that, is only 25, and signed cheap and long term.

            Russell and spare parts is wishful thinking IMO. Then again, I’m still amazed we got Hamilton for what we did.

  • Bean-counting cowboy

    It would hurt, but I would do Gio for Hamonic at this point. Too much uncertainty with Gio’s contract. Maybe even retain up to a mil of salary. That would essentially take Hamonic from 3.8 to 4.8 for us… closer to fair value if they throw in a top forward prospect (Dal Colle, Barzal) for another player of ours or picks going back. Gio contract becomes more palatable for NYI.

    They are in win now mode so they might take that contract if it means no step back in the standings by losing Hamonic. No other rumoured team can offer a player of Gio’s caliber that can play at Gio’s level for THIS year. Klefbom could be good, Byfuglien is not at Gio’s level… I can’t see them interested in forwards. Gio’s scoring ability is something that isn’t quite there with Hamonic that could further entice the Islanders, especially given the offensive talent on that team and their desire to win.

    We would have our top 3 set for the next decade.

  • Parallex

    Hard to come up with a fair trade that makes sense in this situation…

    Here’s probably the best Calgary could do: Russell (50% Retained) + Wideman (50% Retained) + Top Prospect for Hamonic + X (Where X is some non-NHL level talent… AHL/ECHL Lifer/Upcoming RFA that wouldn’t be getting a qualifying offer in order to make the contract limit balance).

    Isles want to win now so a futures only deal doesn’t work. The deal above gives them better NHL depth on the Blueline now, is practically cap and $$ neutral, and out of respect for Hamonic’s relative youth provides something for later in the form of the prospect. Every other hypothetical deal I can think of either makes the Flames worse, doesn’t fit cap/budget wise, or is way too lopsided one way or the other.

    • Bean-counting cowboy

      I was thinking of this exact scenario last night.

      Look at time on ice; we’ll trade you our TWO 23 minute per night defensemen for your one 23 minute per night defensemen. If NYI is looking to win now, this plus a top prospect could get it done.

      Say “hey… in addition to the TOI factor, one guy was the 4th highest scoring D man last year, shoots right and still has 1 year on his contract, the other was the league shot-block leader, both wear the A”, and it was our top D pairing in the playoffs last year (in which we won a round). What more could NYI get in this scenario?

      Brodie/Hamilton (24 mins per night)

      Gio/Hamonic (24 mins per night)

      Engelland/Nakladal (12 mins per night)

      Wideman replaces Hamonic in the NYI line up (shoots right). Russell replaces Strait and you could argue their defense isn’t that much worse off.

  • BurningSensation

    Hamonic is a 25 year old #2 Dman, if he were a UFA you’d be looking at a 1st,2nd and 3rd as compensation, and add in the fact his contract is ridculously good, so he’s worth even more than that.

    Factor in as well that we will be bidding against both Edmonton (who have Klefbom and Justin Schultz) and Winnipeg (Trouba) as young Dman assets they can include in their offers, and our offer will need to be a lot more than a poo-poo platter of Russell and 2nd rnd picks.

    Assuming that our core are off limits, we are likely looking at; our 1st, a high end prospect and probably one that isnt a forward (say Andersson, Gillies, or Kyllington), and Russell or Wideman (with salary retained if it is Wideman).

    Be prepared for this trade to hurt enough that you will wonder if it was wise to do it.

    • cberg

      You’re fired too! What is so great about Hamonic? Not overly physical, fast or offensive. Likely a solid 2-3-4D for the Islanders entering the apex of his career. A reasonable trade would be Russel/Wideman and someone like Granlund. And that’s not considering he wants out and has tied the NYI hands by it going public and with only 4 teams….

      If you want to expand the deal add Hudler on our side and Okposo on theirs. Both unsigned UFAs likely to get traded….

  • ville de champignons

    This is an opportunity the Flames need to take advantage of. We all know who we’d like to be rid of but you have to give value in order to get value. Quality D-men are a rare commodity and it will probably cost us somebody we love but I say make it happen. We got Hamilton for a song, maybe we overpay on this one?

  • RKD

    I for one would be for bringing Hamonic here, but i don’t think it is worth the farm to bring him here. While everyone may think Garth Snow would have an advantage over Treliving I beg to differ. Just because the Flames maybe ripe for the picking doesn’t mean Treliving is going to mortgage the future. In fact, the longer Snow waits to deal Hamonic the more of a distraction it will be for the organization. So at some point Snow will have to pull the trigger on a trade and he may not get exactly what he wants. If the Isles took Hudler and Wides/Russell that would be great. We could reunite Gio and Brodie, then have Hamonic play with Hamilton on the second pairing and whichever ever guy didn’t get traded gets to be paired with Engelland or Smid.

  • ChinookArchYYC

    Russell, Wotherspoon/Culkin and a 2nd. Or Russell & Kulak straight up. They want NHL ready defenseman, not prospects. Their talent pool is pretty stacked right now. This gives them 2 NHL ready defensemen, and gives us our top 4 locked in for the next 4 years at a pretty good cap rate. The bottom pair can be filled in by a number of different replacement level players after Engelland, Smid and Wideman’s contracts are up.

  • ChinookArchYYC

    Anyone who stated that Gio should be traded last year due to his age was soundly and almost universally trashed. Now, after a slow start, everyone wants to get rid of him and the deal he was signed to is terrible.

  • wot96

    What part of the Isles don’t want picks or prospects are people missing?

    Okay, if we are prepared to trade what may be a very high first round pick then I bet they consider it but the Isles will need a good player or two going back and if we are sending some of the high priced help we almost certainly eat salary.

    The reason to be in on this deal is to pump up the price on Edmonton and the others in case they want in.

    • BurningSensation

      The reason to be in on this deal is because Hamonic is a young multi-tool defender who pushes the needle and eats big minutes on a contract roughly half what we pay Wideman.

      He’s a young stud you can build around (and a terrific potential compliment to Hamilton).

      Also, Edmonton getting him is bad.

      • BurningSensation

        Won’t be near enough.

        Winnipeg can put Byfuglien or Trouba (a mistake if they trade Trouba IMO) on the table, and Edm can dangle one of Schultz, Klefbom, Reinhart (which would be hysterical), or even Nurse (which would be a big, big, big mistake).

        A deal based on Hudler gets laughed at by comparison.

        • BurningSensation

          They would laugh a lot harder at a Klefbom, Schultz or Reinhart offer than a Hudler offer. Winnipeg won’t move Trouba for him. Nurse would get a conversation started as would Buff.

          • FlamesRule

            No chance the Oilers trade Klefbom for Hamonic. If you think that is a ‘laugh a lot harder’ than Hudler offer, you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Zero. Fact. Not even an argument.

            The others I agree. Winnipeg won’t do Trouba, Oil won’t do Nurse. Both deals the Isles would take in a heartbeat.

            When you are forced to trade a player the return is never great. Isles lose this trade for sure.

            Lastly Isles only have $5 mil cap space. So anyone more than Hamonic’s 3.7 is going to be tough to balance. I think it knocks the legs out from the Eberle talk.

            But the Hudler idea is a complete laugh… Anyone who thinks Hudler is worth a 25 year old top pair d man on a 7 year contract is smoking the good stuff. Hard.

          • KACaribou

            If you think the Isles would do a Nurse for Hamonic deal in a heartbeat, you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Zero. Fact. Not even an argument. The Islanders are in a situation where they want to win now and won’t trade a legitimate top def with experience for someone trying to crack the worst team in the NHL.

          • DestroDertell

            I don’t think Klefbom would be the offer. He is the Oilers best D-man now, and that is not saying much. But Klefbom alone doesn’t get you a top 4 D either.
            He is less established than Hamonic and not in the same level.

            An equivalent player to Hamonic would be Brodie. What Oiler would you trade Brodie for? Certainly not Klefbom.

          • T&A4Flames

            Now let me ask you. What trade would you except if it got out that Brodie requested a trade but to only 4 teams in the east? We’d all panic and hope for something of quality. The isle are up against it. They are in win now mode and need players to help win. Not picks and prospects. If you knew Brodie wanted out, you’d be happy with a decent return because a great return isn’t likely.

          • McRib

            Who outside of you is saying the “Isles are in win now mode”… Barzal, Beauviller, Dal Colle, Ho Sang, Pulock, Sorokin, Vande Sompel… Not to mention an incredibly young roster that Ryan Strome has a hard time even cracking…

            This is the most blown out of proportion positing I have read in Flames Nation history!!!! Travis Harmonic is a great second pairing defender, or decent first pairing one… If he was a Flame Brodie/Hamilton would still be on the depth chart ahead of him for a half decade or so. Let’s not loose our minds and even consider trading away far superior players. I would love to have him but STOP even bringing up Brodie’s name. Hahah

    • KACaribou

      That would be highway robbery. Yak isn’t worth a 3rd pairing defenseman, let alone a potential top pair guy. Other than a good start with McDavid, he is Mr. Slump.

      Eberle might get them thinking, though the salary is bad. Hall would do it. Other than those two player, EDM has nothing worth trading that they would ever give up.

  • Flames Fan in Edmonchuck

    Sorry to to the negative Nancy b I don’t see us being in on this….. The Ilse would want Brodie or Hamilton and I don’t do either…

  • Skuehler

    If Hamonic is avail, and only to Western Canadian teams, the Flames have to make a serious pitch. Our defense has been terrible this season. We need another Top 4 D. Certainly dont want to stand by as he goes to Vancouber or Edmonton. If there is one thing we have its an overstock of prospects. I think any prospect package should be considered (except Arnold). Gio Brodie and Hamilton should not be on the table. Same with Bennet, Gaudreau, Monahan. Anythig else should be open for discussion. Maybe a larger deal with multiple players going each way?

  • piscera.infada

    I just fail to see how this deal works for anyone in Western Canada frankly.

    New York apparently wants a defenseman back of both comparable age, comparable ability, and on a comparable contract (as their cap-situation would evidence). Now, sure, they might take a similarly high-end forward, but that’s likely not Snow’s first choice. So knowing that, what can a Western Canadian team really afford?

    I doubt a deal works for the Flames. As some have pointed out, a comparable piece (from Snow’s perspective) is likely Brodie or Hamilton. Brodie is much better, and looks to have the makings of a legitimate franchise defenseman in the very near future–no go. Hamilton is a lateral move, but I still much prefer his ceiling to that of Hamonic (Hamonic really doesn’t project much offense long-term). In addition, New York would have to give up additional pieces in order to make Hamilton’s cap-hit and term work.

    The Flames could likely get it done with a piece like Russell, Kylington/Andersson, and a first, but I’m 1) not touching that first this year, and 2) not giving up Kylington or Andersson–this franchise has finally accumulated some defensive depth to push the big club in the coming years, I think you have to keep those. I also think you’ve taken the chance on Kylington, and that’s one you’re going to have to ride out boom or bust–his boom potential is too great to ignore.

    The Canucks quite simply don’t have the pieces to make it work at this point. Tanev would likely get a conversation started, but Vancouver wouldn’t, and rightly shouldn’t be thinking about trading Tanev.

    Winnipeg has a great number of young defensemen that would see Hamonic as likely a lateral move. They could look at Byufuglien, but I doubt New York wants an expiring contract, that they won’t be able to fit into their cap going forward.

    Edmonton, again, doesn’t really have the defensive pieces to make it work. This is an interesting one, as they could offer Eberle or Draisaitl, but it really depends on how starved New York is for offensive production. Eberle would sure look great with Tavares (and I’d finally get to cheer for Eberle–whom I really like, but Edmonton). The question is, can New York fit Eberle in under their cap without giving something more up? I’m not so sure. I’m also skeptical if the “needs” are really compatible with these two teams.

    • STIXLER

      You believe Calgary gets it done with Russel and dreams but Edmonton has to include Draisaitl?
      Would you include Bennett in any trade talk to get Harmonic?
      The debate between Bennett/Draisatl is going to go on for a long time but at this time Leon is playing at a higher level than Sam.

      • Tomas Oppolzer

        Draisaitl also has 30 extra NHL games and a full year of development on Bennett. Unlike Draisaitl, however, Bennett has been a key contributor to his NHL team during his rookie campaign. As a rookie,Leon had 9 points in 37 games, or .23 PPG. Bennett has 12 points in 20 games as a rookie, or .6 PPG.

        One more thing, Draisaitl is almost a year older. Born in Oct. 1995 compared to mid 1996 for Bennett

        • Tomas Oppolzer

          I think what he means is that Draisaitl and Bennett, have similar values to their Organizations.

          Both young 3rd/4rd OVA Picks (same year) and important part of their future.

          You wouldnt trade that at this point, regardless of their small sample size success.

          • piscera.infada

            You wouldnt trade that at this point, regardless of their small sample size success.

            Of course you wouldn’t. Just as the Flames wouldn’t trade Brodie or Hamilton either. The point was that Snow is going to ask about that. I even mentioned that the likely deal for Edmonton is Eberle.

            I threw Draisaitl in my initial post because forward is a perceived strength of the Oilers’ organization–whether you agree with that or not, isn’t the issue.

      • piscera.infada

        You believe Calgary gets it done with Russel and dreams but Edmonton has to include Draisaitl? Would you include Bennett in any trade talk to get Harmonic? The debate between Bennett/Draisatl is going to go on for a long time but at this time Leon is playing at a higher level than Sam.

        You should really work on your reading skills. Let me post an abridged version of exactly what I said vis-a-vis Russell (just to help you out, it sounds like you need it).

        I doubt a deal works for the Flames. As some have pointed out, a comparable piece (from Snow’s perspective) is likely Brodie or Hamilton.

        The Flames could likely get it done with a piece like Russell, Kylington/Andersson, and a first…

        In case you still don’t understand, a comma [,] in this case denotes a list. You might prefer to read that sentence as: “…with a piece like Russell and Kylington/Andersson and a first.“.

        The “first” above, is intended to mean a first round pick–based upon current standings, that first (provided it is this year’s first) will likely be very high.

        “A piece like Russell” means: not necessarily Russell, but a comparable player, when placed in the aforementioned package (again, including Kylington/Andersson and a first round pick), would “likely” (because it’s speculation) get a deal done. Why would it get the deal done? Not because of Russell, but because the first round pick is extremely valuable, and a defensive prospect of Andersson or Kylington’s ilk is valuable as well.

        I then stated that the Flames would be foolish to offer such a package (for obvious reasons).

        Please let me know if you have any further comprehension-related issues you need help with.

        • STIXLER

          Yeah BLAH BLAH BLAH
          a’piece’ like Russell and DREAMS!!
          Dreams being unproven prospects and a lottery pick no doubt.
          My comprehension related issue was why you think Calgary ‘gets it done with scraps but Edmonton has to include a valuable player like Draisaitl.
          Sorry that went over your head.

    • everton fc

      Don’t forget Hamilton is only 21.

      This is what I see as players available:

      From the Flames:

      Hudler + (Russell or Wideman) + (Pick or Prospect)

      *Flames could retain some Salary.

      From the Oil:

      Yakupov + Fayne

      From the Jets:

      Byfuglien + (Pick or Prospect)

      From Canucks:

      (Tanev or Hamuis) + (Pick or Prospect).

      • piscera.infada

        When did I say the Flames should trade Hamilton? I said I wouldn’t trade Hamilton as his ceiling is much higher than Hamonic. I just said that if the Islanders are looking for comparables, it’s a subject that would likely be broached by Snow.

        I don’t think the Isles could fit a Yakupov-Fayne trade under their cap.

      • piscera.infada

        Sure. And that leaves us where, exactly?

        I’m pretty much resigned to the fact that if you’re correct, the Oilers will get him at this point.

        That said, I could see a couple of interesting options in Eastern Canada that would be far more palatable for the Islanders. Both of Toronto and Ottawa might be able to put a package together. It really depends on what exactly Hamonic’s needs are, but I really don’t see this as a situation where there is ill will between the player and the team. It’s more of a team trying to do right for a human they employ. If there’s any give in Hamonic’s proximity demands, it’s possible. We all know that when family and personal issues crop up, you’ll take the best option you can–because family is the most important thing. I also don’t see Hamonic as the type of player that will bend the Islanders of a barrel with unreasonable requests.

        Frankly, Snow knows exactly what he has in Hamonic as an asset: a young, 2/3/4 defenseman on an extremely good contract. He can very much afford to take his time for the right deal.

  • Don’t really know too much about the guy besides what I am reading here. Seems a little knee-jerk to give up on Gio for this guy. Sounds like not much else may work though if they are looking at replacing with a top 4 D. Unless Wideman and/or Russell are overvalued by other teams and possibly the Flames retaining salary, not sure there is a fit.

  • ChinookArchYYC

    Reading through all the comments it appears that 2 prevailing thoughts are at the heart of the trade talk. First, that the trade will be a fair swap and two, the Isles will win the trade. I expect neither will be true.

    The Isles have very few trade partners. They need an top 4 defender back (because I don’t see a replacement in-house that can step in and take those minutes). The trade has to work within the Isles cap and salary framework. Lastly, as tantalizing Homanic is to every GM IN western Canada, everyone will seek to add to their depth, not move laterally especially in light of the Snow’s position of weakness. How many teams can come up with an answer to satisfy Snow’s situation?

    We finally might understand Russell’s TOI and consistent play in Calgary’s top 4. I bet he’s being showcased. He might not be the only peice, but he does check a lot of Snow’s presumed boxes. Yes, this would be a big win for the Flames, but what other team can provide a top 4 defender in a trade, who is cheap and young? I’d say Winnipeg, but they can’t take the Homanic contract (as a budget team). Oh boy, do I hope I’m right.

    • cberg

      Agree pretty much with your thinking here, with the possible exception that I actually think Russell is a good 2nd pair D. Russell is the closest we have to Hamonic, similar salaries, is a top level player i.e. shot blocks, speedy, scoring potential. He’s just not as young so need to add something to sweet the deal i.e. Wotherspoon.

      As for other comments on here, lots of crazy talk. Way overvaluing Hamonic, and way undervaluing Flames’ players. Here’s how I see the value overall:

      Hamonic ~ Russell (older, but high shot blocking, speedier, same $)

      Hamonic ~ Wideman (older, worse D, much better scorer, slower, more $)

      Hamonic less than Hamilton (speedier, younger, better scoring, more $)

      Hamonic much less than Giordano (older, better D, speedier, much better scorer, more $)

      Hamonic much less than Brodie (younger, better D, much faster, better scorer, same $)

      • everton fc

        Again, no one wants Wotherspoon. This includes the Flames. But a name only mentioned once in all these posts – Kulak. He might be the ticket, along w/another prospect or high pick. The Isles are deeper on “d” than we think. Their scoring up front is stable, though Hudler would be a nice addition for them. They won’t take too much salary, as I assume they’ll try to re-sign Okposo. Strome will not be moved.

        If we could pull a fast one and move Russell or Wideman, Kulak is ready for call up. But would Kulak/Granlund or Poirier or Agostino get this deal done, with a pick/prospect coming the other way? Is it fair? Would the Flames be fleeced in such a deal?

        The Isles don’t really need much (too bad they don’t need goaltending!)

  • ChinookArchYYC

    I don’t see Wideman’s name too much in this list. I realize that with his age and cap hit, it’s a bit of a stretch, but perhaps it can work if Calgary is willing to eat a good chunk of his salary, and package him with one of their defensive prospects. NY gets an experienced d-man for the next 2 years at reduced rate, and a young d-man to take his spot after that.

    I realize Wideman isn’t tearing it up right now, but (apart from Brodie) that can be said about the entire flames’ D.

    From what I heard about Treliving, Snow might take that deal just to get him to stop calling!

  • KACaribou

    This isn’t going to happen for anyone. Apparently this request is 2 months old and they couldn’t make a trade privately. Imagine the chances now that the NYI is in a position of weakness.

    A whole lot of yaking for nothing.

    • ronipedia

      Canucks would maybe consider it, but it creates a hole on the left side for them, especially if Hamhuis is gone next season.

      Also, more importantly, Edler has been adamant he won’t waive his NTC when he was in trade rumours last season.