FlamesNation Player Evaluations: Josh Jooris

Josh Jooris was the poster child for making a splash, coming out of virtually nowhere and winning the hearts of hundreds of Flames fans for his unyielding work ethic, depth scoring, and penalty kill work. The undrafted Union College forward made a strong case for sticking around.

This past season? It was noticeably dissimilar at times as it seemed like Jooris was under-used for the attributes and the skill set he possessed. Make no mistake though: the Flames shouldn’t walk away from him at all.

SEASON SUMMARY

Riding on increased expectations from his rookie season in the NHL, Jooris entered the Flames’ roster predominately in a fourth line role. Well away from the varied usage he saw previously, Jooris, for the most part, was anchored away from seeing much of anything beyond limited penalty kill time, and saw sparse time at 5v5.

In 59 games played, Jooris averaged 12:17 per game, a noticeable difference from the season before of 14:29. Even with the consistent issues of staying in the lineup he still managed to accumulate a modest 80 shots through all situations. And with that, due to the budget cutting of sorts on his usage and ice time, he still managed a discreet four goals and nine assists.

At times it felt like Jooris had fallen out of favor with former coach Bob Hartley. Jooris only really missed three games due to a lower body injury in late March. Everything else was a healthy scratch which was never really justified. 

If there is but one potential justification it would be the polar opposite of his decent penalty differential from the year before: -9 for 2015-16 to 2014-15’s +7 at even strength. His aggressive play often got the best of him – which is extremely unfortunate – when the Calgary Flames’ penalty kill could have benefited from more structure and what he offers.

IMPACT ON TEAM

Via Corsica:

jooris2

(Jooris is highlighted in the black circle)

As Pat Steinberg mentioned in his recent RFA piece on Jooris, he saw the essential inverse from last season in zone starts. Objectively it’s likely a factor behind the relatively average results on this team’s performance. Compared to his rookie season, the TOI QoC is no real difference with 2015-16’s season of 28.33% to 2014-15’s 28.88%.

jooris1

When we look at his WOWYs, they appear to be all over the map in a similar fashion to a few bottom six forwards on this team. It’s painfully obvious that when on the ice with the Brandon Bolligs of the world or even Matt Stajan they see a positive modest push in most cases.

Whereas when Jooris was on the ice with Kris Russell, Micheal Ferland, and even Sam Bennett for limited showings there was a very apparent impact on the players involved. This could be a byproduct of various aforementioned factors that can be remedied with the help a new coach, but more importantly it does illustrate that Jooris isn’t a god.

WHAT COMES NEXT?

The salary cap situation with measurable dead weight, the team potentially looking to options in Stockton, and whomever they draft may potentially limit roster spots this fall. The stark reality – which is very similar to Paul Byron – is this: Josh Jooris is someone they might have to part with. Though I would vehemently disagree with this as an option.

The value Jooris brings, which has been covered ad nauseam in the past proves that NHL depth is something to covet. Previously when discussing this very area of concern, I mentioned the pitfalls of a team like Pittsburgh that struggled to cultivate skilled NHL depth. Now, that very team has the all the right pieces in place and is in the Stanley Cup Final.

By no means is Josh Jooris a Conor Sheary or Bryan Rust, as they’ve proven to have better results offensively, but he’s of the ilk of cheap effective depth. Not everyone can be a superstar, but some can be destined for stardom in their respective role.

Surrounding the burgeoning talent this roster possesses with Jooris archetypes who can play the penalty kill and provide safe impacts at 5v5 help facilitate success in an organization.

By no means is everything flawless about Jooris’ game, but it’s measurably better than his cohorts’ glued to the bottom six role on this team currently. If he is re-signed (which he should be), he provides value as outlined, and if he falls out of favor he’s a potential trade chip. 

The AMA Golf Giveaway

Our friends at AMA Travel have put together an exclusive golf getaway for two lucky citizens of the Nation. This is a FREE draw to enter so there’s really no excuse not to try chances for a free golf vacation. 

What’s included?

  • 2 nights accommodation at Ramada Kamloops
  • 2 rounds of golf with a cart at The Dunes at Kamloops Golf Course
  • 2 rounds of golf with a cart at Tobiano Golf Course in Kamloops
  • $50 Esso Gift Card
  • 2 Canada Golf Card memberships valid for 2016
  • 2 Canada Golf Card phone wallets

The fine folks at AMA will pick a grand prize winner on July 17th, and have even sweetened the pot with weekly giveaways which increase your odds of winning something for doing basically nothing. To get further information and to enter this FREE draw just submit your info here.

  • freethe flames

    Jooris is an adequate 4th liner, he can play rw/c and kill penalties. In a pinch he could play on the third line. He however is replaceable and will be passed by in the next two years from within.

    • ChinookArchYYC

      It likely you are right, but at what cost? If a player is marginally better, but t $1M more, then why move him? This is especially important in an NHL market place where the cap may not go up.

      • supra steve

        Generally you get “passed” “from within” by someone younger and cheaper. This is why someone like Jooris does not have the luxury of holding out for a few more dollars. He needs to take what’s offered and be happy he has a spot in the league. It’s unfortunate for him, but that’s the way it is.

        If the Flames had approached Bouma’s contract with this line of thinking they would be better off today.

        • Kevin R

          Agree. I would offer him a Ferland type of 2 year deal at $880-$850K per year. If he doesn’t want to take it, package him with maybe Wideman to the Leafs for Bernier & lets use the remaining 1 year left of Bernier to bridge our goaltender situation & it resolves our cap issue.

  • ChinookArchYYC

    I consider the decision to sign Jooris as a bell weather signal of the Trelliving’s view of playing a possession style of play and balancing his roster with inexpensive players that push play north.
    It will be interesting for me to see if BT can move out some of the big ticket possession anchors, in favour of cheap and effective players like Jooris.