The biggest questions after round one


Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Round one of the the 2016 NHL Draft is signed, sealed, and delivered and the Calgary Flames did not disappoint. Not only did the Flames enjoy the good fortune of having Matthew Tkachuk fall to them at six overall, they were also able to acquire goaltender Brian Elliott from the St. Louis Blues for a reasonable price. With round two just around the corner, here are the biggest questions after round one.

1. Are the Flames done in net?

The acquisition of Elliott was huge and satisfied the team’s immediate need in net at an affordable price. But I’m not convinced the team is done when it comes to revamping things between the pipes. Elliott’s addition likely means the end of Karri Ramo’s time with the team, but some wonder if another new goaltender might be in Calgary’s near future.

To be honest, it wouldn’t surprise me at all to see the Flames to go down that road, whether it be this weekend or in free agency. Personally, though, I wouldn’t mind seeing the team give a duo of Elliott and Joni Ortio a shot. Elliott is a veteran, fairly proven commodity Calgary can trust to lead the way next season. However, Ortio showed me something in the final month or so of last season.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

I’m certainly nowhere near ready to suggest Ortio being ready to be a number one. However, having him start the season in the NHL as Elliott’s backup is something I’d be intrigued by. Remember, Elliott has never started more than 48 games in a season, so having a little insurance there is nice. While some might think that is motivation to upgrade on Ortio, I see it as an opportunity to get him some decent time next season and let him continue to develop. We shall wait and see.

2. What will Brian Elliott’s next contract look like?

Right now, Elliott has one of the most cap friendly contracts in the league. Following this coming season, though, that may no longer be the case. Elliott has one year left on a deal that carries a $2.5 million cap hit which is superb value. We’re talking about a goalie who is routinely near the top of the league in save percentage getting paid less than $3 million. It is such a good deal, in fact, I’m still mildly surprised a Cup contending team like the Blues let him go.

Come July 1st, though, Elliott is eligible for a contract extension and has the opportunity to cash in. While the reported ask on an extension for Ben Bishop to come to Calgary was somewhere in the $7 million annually range (and I’ve been told higher than that), Elliott is likely coming cheaper. But he’s no longer going to be a bargain.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Since arriving in St. Louis, Elliott has posted a save percentage under 0.917 in just one season while being up over 0.920 on three different occasions. He’ll have some leverage as a pending unrestricted free agent, too, so a sizeable raise will be needed for the Flames to keep him. I’d guess somewhere in the $4.5-5.5 million range. That’s still good, but not a steal like his contract is right now.

3. Will the Flames continue moving picks?

Yes, the Flames have parted ways with one of their bevy of picks in the later rounds. They still have eight picks remaining on day two of the draft, though. While their goaltending issue has been solved, I’ve still got my eye on GM Brad Treliving because he’s no stranger to using extra picks in a deal.

If Calgary were to use all eight of their remaining selections, no one is going to complain. But they do still have a surplus and have the opportunity to better their team in the immediacy without hurting themselves in the future.

I’m curious if the Flames could bring in another decent winger by packaging up a couple of picks on day two. I’m not talking about a top line guy but someone who could fit nicely in a middle six role. I also wonder about adding a pick as a sweetener to help take Dennis Wideman’s contract off their hands. I can tell you Calgary was very close to moving Wideman to Edmonton prior to his January incident, so that’s something to keep an eye on on day two.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

4. How close were the Flames to moving in the first round?

Speaking of moving picks, we saw a lot of clandestine conversation on the draft floor Friday night. Most specifically, the hockey world was zoned in on Treliving’s triangle chats with Edmonton’s Peter Chiarelli and Jarmo Kekalainen in Columbus. From how I understand it, the Flames had a very good reason for that.

Calgary’s guy was Tkachuk right from the get-go and they did everything in their power to land him. I can tell you the Flames were lobbying hard to move from six to three or four to secure Tkachuk but were unable to swing something with the teams involved. In the end, it didn’t matter because the team was graced with good fortune and had Tkachuk fall to them at six overall. I guess hard work does pay off!

5. Will Tkachuk play NHL hockey next year?

One of the most interesting things Tkachuk said to me when I had a chance to interview him on Friday was about his immediate future with the team. When I pointed out the team’s last sixth overall pick played a full NHL season right after being drafted, Tkachuk didn’t write off the possibility of suiting up in the show next year like Sean Monahan did in 2013-2014.

“I’ve heard kind of the same thing with him is he had to work on his skating a little bit,” Tkachuk told me. “He worked on that all summer and became a really good skater. I hope to do the same thing because I want to have a similar impact as he did and just have a really good impact on the team next year. I want to.”

At 6’1 and 195 pounds, Tkachuk is a pretty imposing guy in person, so he certainly looks like he could be physically ready to play with men next year. He seems to agree.

“I’m a big kid and it’s all about gaining more speed. If I do that, I’ll be ready.”

I’m not trying to compare Tkachuk to Monahan, because I don’t think that’s fair. Monahan entered the league with a Flames team in a very different situation than today. That said, it wouldn’t be a surprise to see Tkachuk get a few games in to start the season after sitting beside him on Friday. His confidence level is certainly where it needs to be.

  • OKG

    I’d rather leave him in Junior for a year, the Leon Draisaitl treatment, and tell him work on your foot speed than waste an ELC year. I have no doubt he can play now but from a shrewdness perspective it doesn’t make sense to just be “able to play”. Bring him in when Raymond, Bollig, etc are gone.

    • Greatsave

      While there’s some merit to sending him back and having him work on specific things in a familiar environment, and try to continue dominating his age group without Marner and Dvorak (a la Brad Richards and Jonathan Drouin), as well as letting his ELC slide a year, what matters to me in the end is “what is best for his development?”

      You can tell the kid to work on his footspeed, but if he’s going back to a level of hockey where he doesn’t actually need to get faster in order to dominate–i.e. he can just do it through physicality–then that might not be the ideal environment for him to develop in.

      • OKG

        That’s fair. Ideally he would be playing in the AHL, but the dumb CHL rules screw that up. It’s always a dilemma – it was with Monahan, it was with Bennett, and it will be with Tkachuk.

  • Denscafon

    I don’t really see a point in getting another goalie like reimer of the UFA market with elliot on board. I much rather have ortio who is cheaper and good enough to be a back up and who knows, he may bounce back and contend for the starting job near the end of this season. Goalies are the most fickle position in hockey.

    As for Tkachuk always being “the guy” that treliving wanted, I honestly don’t believe that. If Treliving had made that deal with Kekalainen to get 3rd overall, I would of been livid if we pulled what CBJ just did and passed on Puljujarvi for Tkachuk. Tkachuk is a great pick and I’m happy with him falling to us, but I just can’t see that statement being genuine.

    • I know they were trying to move up to pick Tkachuk. Not sure if it was necessarily to move up to 3 straight up to pick him, but that little three way conversation with the Flames, Oilers, and Blue Jackets was aimed at Tkachuk. At least from Calgary’s perspective.

      • #97Train/McDavidCopperfield

        I find that hard to believe. I’d like to see how you know they were moving up to pick Tkachuk ? They got a player they needed just not the one they wanted.

  • SydScout

    Thanks for all the awesome coverage FN guys and radio Pat. Been online since 5am here in Sydney. Loving it, cheered loudly when MT fell to us. Jersey has been on since then, #34, and heading to Olympic Arena tonight for Canada v USA Wayne Gretzky game tonight.

    What a day for a Flames fan down under. I’ll have a beer for each and every reader tonight – The Great One on the ice for some 4 on 4 action in 25 mins. Pumped.

  • flamesburn89

    The fact that Elliot’s cap hit for next season is just $2.5M cannot be understated. If BT had acquired someone like Fleury or Bishop, the Flames would have a lot more difficulty fitting them into the cap with Monahan and Gaudreau’s new contracts upcoming. With Brian Elliot, that concern is considerably lessened.

  • Flash

    #2 and #5 aren’t really questions after the first round. They are for much later.

    Elliott’s next contract depends on how he performs this year and how well Gillies progresses. It’s irrelevant now until we see how they both perform.

    Similarly, whether Tkachuk plays this year depends on how well he does at training camp and during his 9 game tryout after that.

    If he has similar results to what Johnny and Monny had in their tryouts then he’ll make it too.

  • #97Train/McDavidCopperfield

    I think Calgary got a pretty good player in Tkachuk, but did you see Dubois. He was huge and looked in great shape, along the lines of Ekblad when he got drafted.

  • freethe flames

    Draft Day one was pretty good for the Flames; they may have addressed a top 6 forward who may be the perfect fit with Bennett but that is likely a year or two down the road. Added a starting goalie for low cost in regards to assets and a low cap hit. Well done.

    Draft Day two: need to add a top 6 RW(does not need to be elite but can be complementary)and move a troublesome contract and then draft well and stock the cupboards. If possible move up in the 2nd round and get a solid RW prospect.

    Ideas I could live with: Wideman and 66 to Edmonton for Yakipov and 32.

    Wideman and 66 to NYR for Hayes.

    or Bollig and Raymond to Ottawa for Chiasson and Wiercioch.(we don’t really need to sign them but they both interest me as low cost redemption projects)

  • Greg

    Really wish the league and chl would do something with their agreement. There should be an exemption for players drafted in the top ~10 that allows them to go to the AHL and get called up to the NHL.