81
Photo Credit: Sergei Belski-USA TODAY Sports

Sabres 2, Flames 1 (OT) post-game embers: What are you doing

There’s really no point in mincing words: the Buffalo Sabres are a bad hockey team, 30th in the NHL, and the Flames just lost to them.

You’re gunning for a playoff spot? It doesn’t hurt that the Sabres got a point, but this certainly wasn’t the performance anyone would expect out of a playoff team.

Join an exclusive club

The Sabres picked up their 12th win of the season when they beat the Flames. With that, the Flames join 11 other teams who have suffered losses to the Sabres this season: the Bruins (OT), the Devils (OT), the Blue Jackets, the Capitals, the Flyers, the Red Wings, the Senators, the Avalanche, the Coyotes, the Ducks, and the Oilers.

There are some pretty good teams on that list, so that at least helps soothe the ego a little. But still, this is a team that had only won 11 times, had a -59 goal differential (worst in the NHL), and the Flames couldn’t do a thing to them. Chad Johnson had a .878 save percentage, nothing. Johnny Gaudreau is top five in points, Sean Monahan is tied for top 10 in goals, nothing. One powerplay goal and entire segments where the Flames let the Sabres control the flow of the game.

I guess they could check the standings and see they’re still in a playoff spot. But you need points to make the playoffs to begin with, and the Flames shrugged their shoulders and lost one because they matched the performance of one of the worst teams in the NHL.

Having any of their injured guys back would probably help, but that performance was completely unacceptable. Nobody is calling for a blowout, but more than one goal against the team that has surrendered the third most in the NHL shouldn’t be a monumental ask. Apparently it was.

Yeah, overtime was bad, but

Mikael Backlund took a bad penalty, and from there, it was over.

Backlund is the Flames’ best penalty killer. It is never a good sign to see him in the box, especially for something hilariously unnecessary, especially as regulation is about to end. And the Flames didn’t just lose a good penalty killer; they also lost the forward who would have been third over the boards in overtime. They lost their best two-way player and that saw Troy Brouwer man the entire kill, a winger repeatedly losing faceoffs, and that last faceoff lost ended up hurting a fair amount.

Yes, it’s really bad that something with an obvious alternate option may have cost the Flames a point. (Monahan or whoever else may have lost the faceoff as well and then it’s the same result, but less angst, which goes to show how flippant this whole thing is.)

But here’s the thing: it never should have gotten to that point to begin with. I’ll refer you to section one: the Sabres are a bad team, and the Flames didn’t do nearly enough to try to beat them. Brouwer missed a tap-in. Curtis Lazar almost scored except he’s not particularly good so he did not. Brett Kulak has failed to get a goal this far in his NHL career, not for lack of trying, and he had a number of good looks, but just couldn’t pot the puck.

Matthew Tkachuk was probably the most dangerous Flame the entire game but it just wasn’t good enough. Even with the injured players, it is once again becoming readily apparent the Flames’ forward group isn’t deep enough. When the top line is on they’re amazing; when they aren’t, who’s going to cover for them?

Chad Johnson was the better goalie

Literally nobody is going to take Chad Johnson over Mike Smith at this point. Smith has proved his worth and then some over the season to date, evidently the perfect pick up for the Flames. He’s let in some bad goals – and both of the ones last night could have been stopped – but he’s also made a number of fantastic saves, as well.

But Johnson was simply the better goalie on the night. He stopped 32 of 33 shots, the one goal he surrendered an outstanding tip courtesy of Tkachuk. He thwarted Gaudreau multiple times, leaving him seemingly helpless. He was squared up to every high danger chance his defence surrendered.

While Smith didn’t earn a loss, Johnson earned that win. He was just that one extra save better.

Of course, if the Flames were going to win that one, they were counting on their goalie to post a shutout: never a good strategy.

If only the powerplay could do a little more

One-for-three on the powerplay isn’t a bad stat line. Sure, if the Flames had scored one more powerplay goal, they wouldn’t have lost, but this game was more about their failures at even strength than their failures on the man advantage.

No, this is more to note that of the three powerplays the Flames had, Tkachuk drew two of them (Smith the other). It was gravy that Tkachuk actually scored, elevating him to another level of productivity.

But this is neat: Tkachuk has drawn 31 penalties this season at all strengths, tied with Tom Wilson for the most in the NHL. He’s good on all sides of the puck: he can score, he can defend, he can get his team on the powerplay. Imagine how much more impressive that would be if the Flames’ powerplay actually functioned more often than not. And Tkachuk only has 42 penalty minutes this season; Wilson has 109.

Tkachuk just excels at every facet of the game. He played 19:21 and had six shots on net, as well; he was one of the Flames’ most relied upon players. That’s a statement that will probably hold up for years to come.

Seriously, you lost to the Sabres

The Flames getting a point helped keep them solely in second place in the Pacific. They’re a point up on the Kings with the same number of games played; they’re two points back of the Sharks with the Sharks having a game in hand.

There are a couple of games to scoreboard watch today, including the Kings against the Canucks, and the Sharks against the Jets. Best case scenario, the Flames will be a point up on the Kings with a game in hand by the end of the night, and two points back of the Sharks with the same number of games played. Worst case, they’ll be back of the Kings by a point with a game in hand, and four points back of the Sharks.

Which is to say: the standings are extremely close and letting a gimme point slip away is unacceptable.

But their next game is against the Kings – and I’ll take a loss to the Sabres if it means a win over the Kings. But there’s no reason it couldn’t have been two wins instead.



  • moodyblue2

    Gulutzan?? Brouwer 3 face off losses in a row in ot? Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me fool me, 3 times what can we say?? Brutal coaches decision! I wonder what BT and B.B. thought about that debacle! Yikes

  • stuhfan

    What a painful game. Johnson was very good last night, good move by Housley to start him in his home town.

    Side note; that’s a great shot of Smith at the top of this article.

  • Derzie

    Mistake #1: Team not ready. Mistake #2: Didn’t play Rittich against team #30. Mistake #3: Brouwer. Mistake #4: Losing to the gd Sabres. Because they didn’t show up for this game, I’m not showing up for the next game. They don’t deserve our support after that effort. The GG awakening is over it seems. Back to the soon-to-be-fired version of himself.

    • where.is.ville?

      Bad game! They played like they did in December. Dominated much of the game, but could not score. Lots of fancy plays, resulting in lots of low percentage shots. We should have crushed the Sabres!

    • where.is.ville?

      Bad game! They played like they did in December. Dominated much of the game, but could not score. Lots of fancy plays, resulting in lots of low percentage shots (most of them blocked). We should have crushed the Sabres!

    • Rudy27

      I think we are placing too much blame on Brouwer. He played pretty well most of the game. It’s the coaches fault for keeping him out for the whole OT penalty. First off, because you usually change of the PK unit within a minute if there is an opportunity. And secondly, those late draws could have been taken by Stajan, Monny, Janko or Bennett. Brouwer was just doing the best he could, and it looked like after loosing two draws he tried to just shoot it out off the puck drop (didn’t work).

    • Eggs Bennett

      #2 How can you blame Smith for this one? How many grade A chances did he save? If anything you can say the first Sabres goal started from another brain fart blunder from Brodie standing in no mans land instead of taking the open man (or Jankowski for putting it on a tee for their forechecker).

      1st line can’t do it every night – we need secondary scorers to chip in. Also why was Mangiapane scratched for Hrivik? In a time when scoring has dried up, you make as many little moves to try and encourage offence; watching him play, it’s only a matter of time for 88 to breakout.

      • rusty_shakleforde

        I think Hrivik on his own was a good choice, but I think Mange should have been in as well. We desperately need to shift the lines around, and what better game (theoretically…) to do it in than this one?

      • FlamesFanOtherCity

        Maybe the solution (until Frolik is back) is to go Tkachuk-Backlund-Bennett and Stockton’s Finest for the 3rd line. Put Brouwer where he belongs, propping up the 4th line. Hathaway on LW wouldn’t be that bad.

    • KKisTHEproblem

      Didn’t see the whole game but in the parts I saw, I must’ve said 5 times: Jesus Bennet, WTF are you doing? Skating into areas for the other team to just converge on him, lose the puck, generate nothing, time and time again. He just looked awful last night. I have been a fan, hoping he’ll come around as he has all the pieces but I now think he’s one of those guys that will just never be able to truly put all the pieces together. He’s getting PP time, he’s got decent line mates, can’t blame Brouwer anymore. I will be shocked if he ever turns into more than a 3rd line winger. Too bad, looks like a wasted 4th overall pick to me. Look at some of the guys taken after him: Ehlers, Nylander, Larkin, Pastrnak, Fabbri all out producing him. Career average so far: .39 pts per game, yikes. I am not trying to dump on him, I just think its reality and it makes me frustrated and sad for him, the flames and the fans

  • Zalapski

    GG needs to get his crap together. I still don’t understand what he was thinking with Brouwer taking draws.

    Shoutout to Lazar for having some noticeable shifts, he’s starting to look the part of a serviceable 4th liner, lets hope he’s a “late” bloomer.

    Has Smith had any Vezina chatter about him at all yet?

  • Bean-counting cowboy

    I believe it will be very difficult to win a playoff round with GG at the helm. He has improved the team’s possession game but the man still gets himself out-coached on a regular basis. There was several times in that Sabres game where the Eichel line ended up out there against the 4th line – not sure how this happens on home ice. He also tries to go power vs. power at times not realizing the Backlund line is a better option for the other team’s top lines. His insistence on playing old, slow 4th liners on the PK is puzzling to me where the idea of the PK is to break up the other team’s passes with speed and aggression. Dougie Hamilton should be playing at least 2 to 3 more minutes a night – I thought he should have traded spots with Stone at least when there were only 3 seconds left on that kill in OT; if we killed it Dougie could go up the ice for the score. The love affair with Brouwer has to end. Brouwer looks good from the Backlund bump but is dragging the other two down. Frolik can’t come back soon enough.

    And yet… we have points in 9 straight. The seven game win streak in my view was in spite of Glen, not because of him. The personnel on the team is too good to completely stink out the entire season.

    • Skylardog

      The talent on this team is good enough to be first in the Pacific. Coaching is holding us back.

      We upgraded in goal and on D, and dumped some of the waste. We were 4th and upgraded. Those ahead all digressed from a roster standpoint.

      Anaheim is getting old and slow and has had injuries.
      LA has a new coach and has not upgraded from a weak team last year.
      SJ is in transition and in between dumping the old guys and finding new young guys to take over.
      Edmonton is one dimensional and did not replace Eberle’s scoring (over 50 points lost), they also missed their top DMan to injury up until now and Talbot was never going to perform at the level he did last year.
      Vancouver and Arizona are just plain awful.

      We should be 5 to 10 points better than all of these teams at the very least.

      That leaves Vegas. We are 10 points back of an expansion team, and while they are playing amazing hockey, we should be 4 wins better and giving them a run for their money for 1st. The game at the end of the month should be for 1st in the Pacific. I won’t be, we are 10 points back. Vegas is the model for what coaching, excitement, and having fun can do to a team.

      We should be in the top 5 in the NHL with this roster.

      • buts

        You hit the nail on the head skydog…..man oh man as a former coach myself its so frustrating to see GG holding a very talented team back. If BT wants to barely squeak into the playoffs and that’s a big if, then all we could possibly hope for is a first round win or 2. In the playoffs line matching and strategy and special teams are paramount. That’s the most BT will get out of GG. Worst bench/roster/specialty team/motivating coach I have seen in Calgary flames history.

    • Derzie

      GG showed his obsession with the vets in his ‘bank account’ discussion on the Jim Rome show. Vets start out with a full account, rookies with an empty one. GG got accolades for the interview. Apparently they missed the interview Dallas Eakins gave in the same vein. Sounded smart, actually dumb, stubborn and out of touch with reality.

  • T&A4Flames

    This team lacks any kind of killer instinct. We won’t go far in the playoffs…IF WE MAKE IT. I supported GG long enough but it’s done. How long are we going to accept a sub par PP. you don’t win in the PO’s without good special teams.

  • RKD

    What is Sean Monahan? Maybe he will be a perennial 30 goal scorer but how many of his goals have been set up by Johnny hockey. I feel like he comes and goes and when he isn’t scoring he’s not even noticeable out there. Outside of faceoffs I’m struggling to find out what he’s doing out there to add value. We should be adding to the Sabres misery instead we made Eichel who had 7 shots and Chad Johnson look superb. Lots of holes.

  • Off the wall

    Playoff percentage update:
    I’ve omitted the top 4 for obvious reasons.

    5. COL 78.9 –
    6. Dal 69.9
    7. LA 65.9
    8. STL 61.3
    9. Cal 53.5
    10.Min 53.4
    11.Ana 27.6
    12. Chi 15.6

    I’d say we just lost an opportunity to increase our chances against the worst team in the league. Pathetic!

    • I should be GM

      Awesome! We are a coin flip for making the playoffs. Is this what having great goaltending, one of the best defences and some high end forward talent gets us? I wonder if that TSN monkey is available for coaching this team?

  • Burnward

    I thought I was going crazy last night and missed a change or something. Could not believe that crap.
    Unreal stupidity. Not just Brouwer, but Gio and Stone too. Can’t fathom what was going through that coaching staff’s minds.
    About two weeks of good-will gone in a second.
    AND YOU IDIOTS DON’T DESERVE MY TRUST FOR BEING IDIOTS.

      • Grayone

        All this talk of GG’s decisions has been ongoing for sometime. Burnward, I complete understand your frustration. Intelligence demands that one learns from one’s mistakes. The overtime decisions, or lack of them, is most disheartening. In the distant past I coached a major amateur sport at the highest level and goodness I was some embarrassed when I was obviously out-coached. At least I saw the error(s) and attempted to correct and get better through the experience. It is with great sadness that I see this seemingly not happening to GG and maybe his whole staff? The overtime situation and eventual goal is just poor, poor judgment of a elemental sort! Against the league’s best centre you go 1-2-3 with Brouwer? I find it hard to imagine that Tre is not placing coins in the fire-GG piggy bank … Would Tippet have done that? WW: oh how I wish we had a different GG guiding us .. Gerard Gallant.

        Good article Ari yet again … oh sigh.

  • Alberta Ice

    These next 3 games will go along way to prove whether the Flames are contenders or pretenders. (If they get back to their play before the break – contenders; if they play like they have the last two – pretenders.)

    • Alberta Ice

      Golden Knights and Avalanche are proving they are contenders. They are the two most surprising teams of this season for going above and beyond their expectations. Really impressed by the crowd noise level in the Las Vegas home barn. And did you all hear that pin drop at the Saddledome last night?

  • FlamesFanOtherCity

    Brouwer played 1:21 to end the period, which include the ensuing penalty and PK. He played without a break or time-out an additional 1:30 in OT. So, he was on for the play that resulted in a penalty as well as the entire PK that resulted in a goal at even strength.

    Considering that the unit had 4-5 seconds left to kill before they could go back on offence, I question the logic of using 3 guys that played that long. A successful PK would turn into an offensive chance, with 3/4 guys too tired to even skate to the far end.

    • Bean-counting cowboy

      My thoughts exactly while I was watching. I would have sent out Dougie, Brodie and Johnny for that last 4 seconds. Two smooth skating offensively minded d-men that can rush up the ice and help on the last tiny bit of PK.

  • calgaryfan

    Monahan soft one dimensional player, Backlund soft one dimensional player, Stajan soft ready to retire player, these are the Calgary Flames centers, maybe it is not the coach!

    • calgaryfan

      The Flames are not a hard team to play against, their compete level or tenacity is lacking. They have some players that do not appear to care enough about winning.

  • Eggs Bennett

    Any thoughts about publishing a detailed article about Calgary’s lethargic PP similar to the PK articles? It seems like players tend to hold the puck too long looking for passing plays, which gives the opposing PK ample time to block lanes or pressure the puck carrier. Even though we beat TBL earlier this month, watching their PP leaves much to be desired. Their players use lots of quick touch passes, which forces the PK into a smaller more passive formation, creating more high danger chances. The only time I’ve seen us using touch passing is Johnny passing to Monny in the slot and Monny touch passing back to Johnny, which doesn’t do much for opening up their defense or give Johnny any more options.

    I don’t believe this is an issue regarding lack of skill, as we have some pretty high IQ guys on the roster. It seems more like a systems issue where players haven’t practiced enough to intuitively know where to quick touch pass to, which is why they take time to look at their passing options.

    Also, how about we figure out an entry other than the skate to centre ice and drop pass to Johnny for the carry-in??? Some teams know this is 80% of our zone entries and just clog up the blue line!!

  • Derian Hatcher

    A few years ago, when my son played junior hockey, their team went into overtime. I was watching the bench just before the overtime and the coach was going over the “plan”. The ref blew the whistle and as the players on the ice were getting ready to face off, I noticed a lot of player movement on the bench; players shuffling postions on the bench etc. They ended up winning in overtime and I asked my son what was happening on the bench just before OT. He said that after the coach told the players who he wanted on the ice in OT, the captain asked his teamates if they wanted to win the game. Of course, they said yes, and the captain started calling out lines and d-pairs who would be going out next, opposite of what the coach wanted. Interestingly, the captain was the third forward pair out, not the first. After the game, in the room, the coach said nothing – just “good win”. My son said “We all knew who should have been on the ice in OT for the best chance to win”

    Obviously, this could not happen at the NHL level, but even as an Oiler fan, I was talking to my TV asking WTF GG was thinking having Brouwer taking all those face offs. Reminded me of the time when McClellan put Lucic out 3-on-3 OT – I was screaming at my TV – WTF was he thinking. When fans of teams recognize obvious player management mistakes, you have to wonder about the coaching.

    • Off the wall

      Good observation. It speaks volumes when you understand how coaching can make o break a team.

      We have the worst home record among the Western Conference for a team thats going to be in a potential playoff position.

      This needs fixing, now, otherwise no playoff for us!

  • rusty_shakleforde

    Possible line combos (without certain older players):

    Johnny-Mony-Ferly
    Bennett-Backs-Byng
    Mange Janko ?
    Hrivik Lazar Hathaway

    Hopefully Frolik makes it back soon. Maybe plug him in the 3rd line? Maybe have hath up on third for an AHL line, but not sure there is enough experience/hath needs some sort of kick in the pants perhaps.

    • rusty_shakleforde

      Just really not sure why the flames organisation has to keep these older guys out. I get the money argument and the bad deal guilts, but seriously they’re putting that over competitiveness? I also get that it takes time to craft a team and lines to certain systems, but it seems like GG or whoever doesn’t think our players can play on their own without their hands being held by coaching staff.

  • Derian Hatcher

    Please don’t…Not ALL Oiler fans were preaching Stanley Cups. Many of us were rightfully nervous about this season. Trolling on both sites just lessons the reading experience and gets tiring on both sites. Quality hockey discussion is a win for everyone. I’m honestly not trying to soapbox here, but the trolling does get old and tiring IMO

  • deantheraven

    Long time long distance fan (and NHL.com subscriber) here who almost never misses a game and sometimes has to take great pains to shield himself from the score before viewing (MST+8), today was one time when I actually felt relieved that I saw the score. While it sounds like the effort was there from some of my favourite players, this was one I’m glad I had the opportunity to pass on watching.
    I feel for you Season Ticket holders. You got Buffalo’d last night.

  • Ari Yanover

    Yeah, this is a great way to get banned from this site.

    I’m gonna pop over to ON at the end of the day and if I see you’ve still been at “trolling them” you’re gone from here.

  • Jobu

    Jobu is telling you now, getting points from the 4 games against the Knights will either make or break this year. Right now, the Flames don’t deserve to be in the same conversation as them, and their running out of time to correct it.