Flames Scoring Chances - Game 4 versus Edmonton

Kent Wilson
October 16 2010 10:55PM

Scoring Chances for NHL Game Number 20065

Team Period Time Note CGY Opponent  
CGY 1 17:34   3 12 18 28 34 40 6 26 27 35 83 89 5v5
CGY 1 15:04   3 4 11 15 20 34 6 13 26 35 67 91 5v5
EDM 1 14:40 Hemsky goal 3 4 12 18 34 40 6 35 77 83 89 91 5v5
EDM 1 13:42   4 8 10 13 27 34 2 4 10 14 35 49 5v5
CGY 1 12:47   5 6 11 15 20 34 6 13 35 67 77 91 5v5
CGY 1 10:59 Tanguay goal 3 12 18 28 34 40 27 35 49 77 83 89 5v5
CGY 1 5:11   4 20 28 34 42   4 6 13 35 67 77 4v5
CGY 1 5:06   3 4 12 18 34   2 16 28 35 49   4v4
CGY 1 4:37   3 4 12 18 34 40 2 16 28 35 49   5v4
CGY 1 3:13   3 4 8 10 13 34 6 16 28 35     5v3
CGY 1 3:07   3 4 8 10 13 34 2 10 35 49 67   5v4
EDM 1 0:24   3 11 15 20 28 34 6 26 27 35 83 89 5v5
EDM 2 19:38 Penner goal 3 12 18 28 34 40 6 26 27 35 83 89 5v5
CGY 2 17:03 Morrison goal 5 6 8 18 34 44 4 13 14 26 35 77 5v5
CGY 2 16:47   5 6 12 18 34 40 2 13 35 49 67 91 5v5
CGY 2 16:37   5 6 12 18 34 40 2 13 35 49 67 91 5v5
EDM 2 15:56   4 24 27 34 42 44 6 16 26 28 35 91 5v5
EDM 2 15:45 Paajarvi goal 4 24 27 34 42 44 6 16 26 28 83 91 5v5
CGY 2 14:36   4 6 8 18 34 40 4 6 10 14 26 35 5v5
CGY 2 12:53   4 6 11 15 20 34 6 16 26 28 35 91 5v5
CGY 2 12:52   4 6 11 15 20 34 6 16 26 28 35 91 5v5
EDM 2 6:37   4 5 12 18 34 40 2 27 35 49 83 89 5v5
EDM 2 6:35   4 5 12 18 34 40 2 27 35 49 83 89 5v5
CGY 2 2:47   5 8 10 13 27 34 6 16 28 35 77   5v4
CGY 2 2:27   5 8 10 13 27 34 6 16 28 35 77   5v4
EDM 3 18:39   4 8 10 13 27 34 4 5 10 14 35 77 5v5
CGY 3 18:00   5 6 11 15 20 34 2 13 35 49 67 91 5v5
CGY 3 16:17   3 12 18 28 34 40 2 27 35 49 83 89 5v5
CGY 3 15:48   5 6 8 10 13 34 2 4 10 14 35 49 5v5
CGY 3 15:33   5 6 8 10 13 34 4 6 10 14 26 35 5v5
CGY 3 15:32 Hagman goal 5 6 8 10 13 34 4 6 10 14 26 35 5v5
CGY 3 14:50   4 15 18 20 27 34 5 16 28 35 67 77 5v5
CGY 3 14:28   15 18 20 27 28 34 5 16 28 35 67 77 5v5
CGY 3 13:50   3 12 28 34 40   2 35 49 83 89   4v4
EDM 3 13:31   3 12 28 34 40   6 26 35 83 89   4v4
EDM 3 13:16   3 12 28 34 40   6 14 26 35 83   4v4
CGY 3 12:35   5 12 13 34 40   6 16 28 35     4v3
CGY 3 12:12 Iginla goal 5 12 13 34 40   6 16 28 35     4v3
CGY 3 11:03   5 6 8 10 13 34 5 13 35 67 77 91 5v5
CGY 3 10:56   5 6 8 10 13 34 5 13 35 67 77 91 5v5
EDM 3 7:33   3 4 8 10 13 34 2 4 6 10 14 35 5v5
CGY 3 3:33   3 12 18 20 28 34 5 27 35 77 83 89 5v5
CGY 3 2:44   5 11 15 20 28 34 2 4 6 10 14 35 5v5

 

# Player EV PP SH
3 I. WHITE 13:29 7 6 2:54 2 0 0:00 0 0
4 J. BOUWMEESTER 17:38 6 8 2:54 2 0 4:33 1 0
5 M. GIORDANO 15:28 11 2 2:39 4 0 2:46 0 0
6 C. SARICH 14:53 13 0 0:00 0 0 3:19 0 0
8 B. MORRISON 13:49 7 3 2:02 3 0 0:00 0 0
10 N. HAGMAN 12:56 5 3 2:02 3 0 0:00 0 0
11 M. BACKLUND 11:16 6 1 0:07 0 0 2:51 0 0
12 J. IGINLA 14:52 8 6 3:24 3 0 0:00 0 0
13 O. JOKINEN 13:23 5 3 2:37 5 0 0:20 0 0
15 T. JACKMAN 13:08 8 1 0:07 0 0 0:00 0 0
18 M. STAJAN 13:56 11 4 2:49 1 0 0:00 0 0
20 C. GLENCROSS 12:23 9 1 0:07 0 0 3:02 1 0
24 C. CONROY 4:46 0 2 0:00 0 0 2:53 0 0
27 S. STAIOS 13:22 2 4 2:00 2 0 0:00 0 0
28 R. REGEHR 17:34 7 4 0:07 0 0 5:06 1 0
34 M. KIPRUSOFF 46:08 23 12 5:33 6 0 7:52 1 0
40 A. TANGUAY 14:05 7 6 3:21 3 0 2:51 0 0
42 B. SUTTER 6:10 0 2 0:00 0 0 2:08 1 0
44 S. MEYER 5:59 1 2 0:00 0 0 1:39 0 0

 

Period Totals EV PP 5v3 PP SH 5v3 SH
1 9 3 5 3 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
2 8 5 6 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 14 4 12 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Totals 31 12 23 12 6 0 1 0 1 0 0 0

Flames dominated this one all around. Curtis Glencross was a monster at ES in particular. Other items of interest:

- Iginla was decent in the offensive zone, but he gave a lot back going the other way.

- Steve Staios somehow ended up underwater.

- Backlund's number is nice, but again he's benefitting from playing with Glencross and, to some extent, Jackman both of whom are truly driving things on that line.

39d8109299a9795cb3b41a4e9b49d501
Former Nations Overlord. Current FN contributor and curmudgeon For questions, complaints, criticisms, etc contact Kent @ kent.wilson@gmail. Follow him on Twitter here.
Avatar
#1 Robert Cleave
October 16 2010, 11:00PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Dennis had them 25-13 CGY, 21-13 at EV, and Edmonton was 4-17 when Hemsky wasn't on the ice. That team has been getting a reality check since the opener.

Avatar
#2 SmellOfVictory
October 16 2010, 11:10PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

It was nice to watch a real hockey game, I'll say that much. I would also like to defend Backlund (to the death, I say); he did give away the puck a number of times, but he didn't look terrible defensively and while his shot choice is pretty awful so far as RO mentioned, he's a good passer.

Avatar
#3 dotfras
October 16 2010, 11:28PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Had a great time watching this game. I was thinking to myself when we were down 3-2, even if the Flames don't win this one, at least it's been a great game to watch and you can tell they were trying out there.

They killed it, Backlund looked pretty good, his line was trucking out there.

Great effort all around (minus Staois, he actually didn't look good at all) Can't wait for Moss, Bourque & hopefully Lanks back at sometime.

Avatar
#4 Justin Azevedo
October 17 2010, 02:39AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

"Steve Staios somehow ended up underwater."

Well...

Avatar
#6 Tach
October 17 2010, 10:55AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Re Backlund,

I think he has been good (Well, third line good anyways) from his own end in to about the top of the opposing faceoff circles, but as R O nailed in his assessment, he takes low percentage shots way too much. He needs to maintain possession and/or drive the puck to the net in those scenarios, plus improve on his play off the puck when his teammates have control in the offensive end.

As for Jackman, I don't see him driving things out there, except maybe once the puck gets in the zone he is capable of not giving it away. He has hands of stone going to the net though and generates no speed through the neutral zone.

Glencross is the only part of that line that contributes end to end.

Comments are closed for this article.