Photo Credit: Sergei Belski-USA TODAY Sports

What should we expect from Troy Brouwer in the playoffs?

Troy Brouwer’s first season as a member of the Calgary Flames has largely been a disappointing one after signing a four-year, $18 million contract on July 1. One refrain we’ve heard in some quarters, though, has been how much Brouwer raises his game come the postseason. But is that claim legitimate? With the Flames very likely playoff bound, and with Brouwer struggling the way he has, I thought I’d attempt to answer that question.

This season

It is tough to dispute how much Brouwer has struggled in his first year as a member of the Flames. His counting numbers (12 goals, 23 points in 67 games) are mediocre and his underlying numbers are telling very much the same story. Note: Numbers compiled in this article are through Thursday, March 23.

With the sixth highest zone start on the team, Brouwer has managed some of the worst possession numbers. His shot rate is third worst on the Flames and second worst amongst forwards; only Garnet Hathaway and Matt Bartkowski have lower CF% ratings, both with much lower zone start ratios. It’s not like Brouwer can chalk it up to bad luck, either, as his PDO is right about where it should be. Unfortunately, Brouwer has been one of the least effective players on the team this season.

Furthermore, Brouwer has had a negative impact on those he’s played with, compounding the problem even more. Below are Brouwer’s three most frequent linemates this season and what they’ve done with and without Brouwer, using data from stats.hockeyanalysis.com.

On the bright side, this is one of the worst seasons for Brouwer in recent memory and he has had some decent games sprinkled in. In saying that, though, nothing he’s done in almost his first full season in Calgary seems to suggest a big bump is coming in the postseason. But before we make a conclusion, let’s analyze what he’s done in past postseason appearances.

Playoff history

Starting with his first full season in 2008-09, Brouwer has only been on a team that failed to make the playoffs on one occasion (the 2013-14 Capitals). In looking at his history in the postseason, we’ll go back to the 2011-12 season, his first year after leaving Chicago, and go from there.

Clearly last year’s postseason was Brouwer’s best, both from a counting and underlying perspective. He was productive on the ice and wasn’t getting a huge benefit from luck or percentages. Brouwer was decently effective in the two prior playoff years, too. So how do these numbers compare to the regular season, then? Does Brouwer’s play historically take a turn for the better?

Actually, other than Brouwer’s first year with Washington, his outputs are better in the playoffs than they are in the regular season. There could be any number of reasons as to why, but Brouwer’s last three postseason appearances would lend some credence to the “he’s better in the playoffs” conversation.


It’s tough to deny how disappointing Brouwer’s first season with the Flames has been. As noted, he’s been one of the team’s least effective players for the balance of the season and many are cringing at the thought of three more years at $4.5 million. If there is a way to salvage this campaign, though, it would definitely be through an effective postseason.

While nothing I’ve seen this season, either analytically or with my own eye, would suggest a playoff jump, I can’t ignore the last number of seasons, either. In his last two seasons specifically, Brouwer has gone from being an average player in the regular season to a fairly effective one come the postseason. So what conditions will help Brouwer keep that trend going?

First and foremost, he has to be put with the right centre. In his two most recent playoff appearances, Brouwer has played primarily on a line with an effective, play-driving pivot. In 2014-15, his centre was Jay Beagle while last year saw Brouwer on Paul Stastny’s flank for the vast majority of the postseason. During the two seasons in question here, Beagle and Stastny were effective two-way centres all year long, both in the regular season and playoffs.

As we project the playoffs this season in Calgary, I think Matt Stajan makes the most sense to pair with Brouwer. Stajan has been extremely effective in a depth role this season (50.3 CF%, 34.1 OZS%) and has helped elevate players like Lance Bouma, Micheal Ferland, and Garnet Hathaway at different stages. While the initial returns on Stajan and Brouwer playing together haven’t been great, I think that duo with Kris Versteeg has the opportunity to be moderately successful come the postseason.

Projecting a player into the postseason is very much an imperfect science, so all we can really do is look at past results and go from there. Luckily for the Flames, Brouwer has a somewhat proven track record of being better in the playoffs than in the regular season. In a largely negative first year in Calgary, a repeat performance come mid-April would be a welcome bright spot for Brouwer.

  • Thunder1


    if LA left Kopitar unprotected in the expansion draft, would Vegas take him…

    Kopitar, Brown and Gaborik signed through the 20-21 season… fully a quarter of the team’s cap space committed… the stench of the 16-17 season season will come to be known as the start of the great Los Angeles tire fire.

    Their top prospect is Adrian Kempe… it says here Sutter will be back at his central Alberta ranch by September… poor Angeledos will put up with the stench of this calamity for many years after that.

    book it

    • ThisBigMouthIsRight

      Yeah, I was looking at LA’s Cap and next year… Tanner Pearson(LW/RW & 24) is RFA ??? I wonder what kind of #’s magic they will have to pull off to pay him accordingly, I wonder what it would take to rescue him from an aging LA team in the decline with tons of Cap problems for a very long time. Its an interesting situation.

  • Joeymullen'sghost

    Brower’s best games recently were against Wash. And St Louis (his two former teams) seems he turns it up when he wants to and historically he picks it up during the playoffs as well. So is that what leadership means. He coasts for most of the year but tries when HE wants to. Brower is a bust – but what if he does have a better playoff performance – what does it actually say about his attitude And what message is that sending to the younger players – that the regular season doesn’t matter just take the season ticket holders money and run ??

    • HAL MacInnis

      A lot goes on behind the scenes that we never hear about. I’m hoping that Gulutzan finally got through to Brouwer, and his improved performances as of late are not just coincidences against former teams.

  • everton fc

    Versteeg-Stajan-Brouwer is a good playoff like. But that leaves a 4th line of Bouma-Bennett-Chiasson. Would that work?

    As for Kopitar, that cap-hit is insane!

  • HAL MacInnis

    I don’t mean to stoke the fire, but if Brouwer doesn’t turn things around in the playoffs… what are the options to get his salary off the team’s cap hit? A buyout? It sucks to have conversations like this about our players, but Brouwer was not hired as a development project. He has not held up his end of the bargain.

    • JumpJet

      Arizona and New Jersey are two teams who like taking bad contracts. Arizona has $16M coming off the books with the Pronger and Datsyuk contracts as well as the salary they retained when they traded Hanzal and Stone. They’re going to want to get to the cap floor and maybe they actually want to pay someone to play hockey this time.

  • Cofred24

    If Brouwer plays well in the playoffs, and the whole team keeps playing the way they are lately, the flames are gonna be a very hard team to beat. Looking like a very dangerous Western conference team.

    • BendingCorners

      I’d rather see Freddie than Lance with Matt and Troy. The numbers above just confirm what we’ve seen all season; if you start in the OZ and get him the puck Troy will shoot it. Freddie has more puck-handling skill than Lance and if that line is going to have mostly OZ starts then Lance’s hitting skills won’t be as important.

  • oddclod

    Identity crisis. What was the thought to be a poor man’s Backes turned into a Rich man’s Bouma. No goals no fights. This coaster plays up to his shoe size instead of his weight class. #BUST. Show me wrong or get exposed.

  • Flaymin Frank

    There’s no fire in his belly. A complete bust IMHO. But you can’t hit a home run with every acquisition. Four of our 7 remaining games are against the Ducks & SJS, basically playoff hockey. We’ll see if #36 can drum up any truculence cuz right now he’s just taking up a roster spot that should be used for somebody else.

    • Thumper

      Right? I can’t quite make sense of it either. The year his CF went up his OZ starts went up as well. When CF went down his OZ starts also went down. At best it’s a wash… seems like his usage changes from regular season to playoffs, but that’s about all you can glean from that table.