logo

FlamesNation Top 25 of 2020: #10 — Compensatory pick could solve last summer’s Neal-Lucic swap

alt
Photo credit:Jerome Miron/USA Today Sports
Zach Laing
3 years ago
Welcome to the yearly wrap up of the top read articles over the last year!
And it did!
But on June 5, Pat Steinberg threw out the idea of a compensatory pick being exchanged in the deal to balance things out.
That article became the 10th most-read article on FlamesNation this year.
Steinberg made arguments for both teams and offered up some final thoughts listed here:
Here’s how I see it. The conditions weren’t met, so Edmonton shouldn’t be penalized. However, in a totally unprecedented scenario, I don’t think the Flames are out of their tree to lobby for something. A compensatory pick would be a nice medium to help satisfy both sides (and other similar situations around the league).
If that were to happen, the NHL would award Calgary a pick at the end of a round; let’s choose the fifth round for sake of conversation. It would essentially make the 2020 fifth round 32 picks long instead of 31 and serves two masters: nothing surrendered for one and something gained in good faith for the other.
The only downside to this idea would be potential griping by other teams, as their final few picks would be pushed back one spot. By making a compensatory pick later on, though, I feel those voices would be more muted than if it were plopped into the top 100.
Much like the two teams in question, and likely the league, I have no idea how this is going to play out. But if the NHL is keen on listening to both teams, compensating one side without taxing the other feels like the easiest path to a solution.
On Twitter: @zjlaing
 

Check out these posts...