Flames Scoring Chances – Game 2 versus Los Angeles

Scoring Chances for NHL Game Number 20025

Team Period Time Note CGY Opponent  
LAK 1 19:09   3 8 10 17 28 34 8 11 23 33 45 94 5v5
LAK 1 18:40   7 8 10 17 34 66 3 7 14 15 28 45 5v5
CGY 1 18:01   7 11 15 20 34 66 6 17 26 27 44 45 5v5
CGY 1 18:00   7 11 15 20 34 66 6 17 26 27 44 45 5v5
LAK 1 16:55   4 5 24 34 42 44 8 10 13 19 33 45 5v5
LAK 1 15:10   4 8 10 17 34 66 3 7 14 15 28 45 5v5
CGY 1 12:35   4 5 8 10 15 34 8 10 13 19 33 45 5v5
CGY 1 7:51   3 5 12 13 34 40 6 7 13 15 17 45 5v5
LAK 1 6:57   3 4 12 13 34 40 8 11 23 33 45 94 5v5
CGY 1 2:47   4 5 15 20 34 42 6 10 11 23 44 45 5v5
CGY 1 1:21   4 5 12 13 34 40 8 11 23 33 45 94 5v5
LAK 2 18:42   3 20 34 42 66   6 14 23 26 28 45 4v5
LAK 2 17:23   3 8 10 15 28 34 7 11 23 33 45 94 5v5
LAK 2 13:48   5 15 20 28 34 42 3 7 10 14 28 45 5v5
CGY 2 12:32   4 5 12 13 34 40 8 11 23 33 45 94 5v5
LAK 2 11:12   8 15 20 28 34 66 3 7 14 15 28 45 5v5
CGY 2 8:30 Glencross goal 4 20 28 34 42   3 8 10 11 45 94 4v5
CGY 2 6:02   3 15 24 34 44 66 6 10 13 19 44 45 5v5
CGY 2 5:19   5 12 13 34 40 66 3 7 17 26 27 45 5v5
LAK 2 4:07   3 4 12 13 34 40 8 11 23 33 45 94 5v5
LAK 3 19:17   3 8 10 15 28 34 3 7 14 15 28 45 5v5
CGY 3 18:41 Conroy goal 4 11 20 24 28 34 3 14 15 28 44 45 5v5
CGY 3 18:02   4 11 20 24 28 34 6 17 26 27 44 45 5v5
CGY 3 16:55   4 12 13 28 34 40 8 11 23 33 45 94 5v5
CGY 3 12:27   3 4 12 13 34 40 8 11 23 33 45 94 5v5
CGY 3 10:55   5 12 13 34 40 66 3 15 28 44 45   5v4
CGY 3 10:43   5 12 13 34 40 66 3 15 28 44 45   5v4
CGY 3 10:26   4 5 15 20 24 34 7 11 33 45 94   5v4
CGY 3 9:18   3 8 10 12 34 66 3 8 23 28 45 94 5v5
CGY 3 8:39   4 11 34 42 44 66 3 6 10 14 28 45 5v5
CGY 3 7:14   4 5 8 10 20 34 7 17 26 27 44 45 5v5
LAK 3 5:57   4 12 13 28 34 40 8 11 23 33 45 94 5v5
LAK 3 5:55 Brown goal 4 12 13 28 34 40 8 11 23 33 45 94 5v5
CGY 3 2:24   3 12 13 28 34 40 6 11 23 33 45 94 5v5
LAK 3 0:01   4 11 34 42 44 66 10 17 27 44 45   5v4

 

# Player EV PP SH
3 I. WHITE 18:29 5 5 4:01 0 0 2:38 0 1
4 J. BOUWMEESTER 19:39 10 6 5:54 1 1 3:30 1 0
5 M. GIORDANO 16:42 7 2 5:09 3 0 2:19 0 0
7 A. PARDY 0:43 2 1 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
8 B. MORRISON 10:33 3 6 3:52 0 0 1:05 0 0
10 N. HAGMAN 13:38 3 5 4:58 0 0 0:18 0 0
11 M. BACKLUND 8:39 5 0 3:39 0 1 0:32 0 0
12 J. IGINLA 15:31 8 4 5:11 2 0 0:00 0 0
13 O. JOKINEN 16:04 7 4 4:35 2 0 0:30 0 0
15 T. JACKMAN 12:16 5 4 0:35 1 0 0:25 0 0
17 R. BOURQUE 2:05 0 3 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
20 C. GLENCROSS 12:26 6 2 0:35 1 0 2:57 1 1
24 C. CONROY 8:44 3 1 0:16 1 0 0:46 0 0
28 R. REGEHR 22:09 4 7 0:24 0 0 2:20 1 0
34 M. KIPRUSOFF 44:39 17 12 9:25 3 1 5:50 1 1
40 A. TANGUAY 13:55 7 4 3:29 2 0 1:25 0 0
42 B. SUTTER 8:59 2 2 0:42 0 1 3:14 1 1
44 S. MEYER 10:58 2 1 0:23 0 1 0:28 0 0
66 T. BRODIE 12:11 6 3 3:22 2 1 0:53 0 1

 

Period Totals EV PP 5v3 PP SH 5v3 SH
1 6 5 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 4 5 3 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
3 11 4 8 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Totals 21 14 17 12 3 1 0 0 1 1 0 0

HSH Ice

An interesting evening, with things pretty even until the third period, when Calgary took over. Flames fans will say the team found it’s legs, Kings fans will say the Kings were tired from playing two in two nights. There’s probably some truth in both claims.

Iginla et al had a much better evening relative to the first game and they faced pretty tough competition in Smyth, Kopitar Brown. The "second line" featuring Morrison and Hagman were all underwater, although most of the damage was done in their first couple of shifts.

 

  • I tried it at home

    So (just to get an understanding of this), the section in which you gave the player names, with green and red, for example Brodie: 6 in green 3 in red, that’d mean he got 6 scoring chances and gave up 3 right??

      • CitizenFlame

        It reminds me of that scene in the Matrix when Neo was released from the matrix and he is looking at the computer screens with the numbers scrolling down and Joe Pantoliano tells him that he doesn’t even see numbers anymore “only blondes and brunettes”. Soon you’ll only see Bourques and Iggy’s.

  • CitizenFlame

    I didn’t get to see much of the game but from what I did see Iginla looked strong, especially that one rush where he faked inside and cut out then drove the net and almost flicked it over Bernier’s glove was nice. His scoring chances seem to bear out the strong play.

    One thing though, I notice is that Backlund has not received much positive reviews for his play yet his SC+ at EV look good at 5-0. Not much ice time though, is it safe to assume he was sheltered pretty aggressively by Sutter?

    • It was mostly Glencross and a little bit of Jackman, whom Backlund was skating with, driving things. He was the pretty much stapled to the bench for the latter half of the third period when Sutter was protecting the lead as well, limiting his exposure. He was also kept far, far away from Kopitar and Brown.

  • While we didn’t dominate in the first 2 periods, it is nice to see that we held our own against a good younger team. It could be, however, a tired LA team and it is early in the season so they are probably trying to work out some kinks as well. But, Calgary was shortbenched early and they were at least working hard. so, GO FLAMES!!