The Rise and Fall of Darryl Sutter – Part 1: Sutter’s Genius

Few figures in the history of the Calgary Flames have been more contentious than Darryl Sutter. Both universally loved and universally reviled at points during his seven year reign as the club’s general manager, Sutter is a man of competing, dichotomous narratives: the idiot and the savant, if you will. each seemingly valid and both worthy of further inspection. In this post, the first of a six-part series, I investigate the roots and inception of his rise to power in Calgary.


Darryl Sutter arrived in Calgary with an already strong reputation in the hockey community. The second oldest of the Sutter brothers, Darryl played 406 games in the NHL before retiring and becoming a member of the coaching fraternity. Hardworking and ill-tempered on the ice, Darryl brought a similar temperament behind the bench for the Chicago Blackhawks (1992-1995) and San Jose Sharks (1997-2003) before landing in Calgary in place of Greg Gilbert.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Sutter was Mike Keenan’s assistant coach in Chicago, debuting on a high note in 1992 when the club would finish first in the Norris division with 106 points. To this day, that total remains the best of coaching – and managing – career.

The Blackhawks extended fall from grace would begin apace the next season however and bottom-out in 1994-95 with a 53 point campaign. The failure resulted in a round of firings and Darryl would find himself unemployed until San Jose came calling in 1997.

An inchoate franchise at the time, the Sharks had stumbled through a number of their early years with some modest success and a few play-off upsets (Detroit Red Wings, Calgary Flames) under their belts. However, the years 1995-97 marked a solid step backward for the franchise, with successive bottom-of-the-ladder finishes and a return to the dreaded "rebuild". 

Like his arrival in Calgary, Darryl Sutter was brought in to firm up a sagging organization. The Sharks would hover around the .500 mark for the first three of Sutter’s years as the head coach before finally posting winning records in 2000-01 (95 points) and 2001-02 (97 points).

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Despite the ascension, their play-off success remained marginal, only twice advancing as far as the second round. In 2003, the team stumbled out of the gates amidst contract disputes with Evgeni Nabokov and Mike Rathje. The resultant 9-12-2-1 record was enough to cut Sutter’s time in Northern California short.

Despite the ignominious end to his tenure in San Jose, Darryl’s stock had risen around the league as a result of the Sharks franchise-best seasons he was able to author from 2000 to 2002. He remained out of work mere days before the Calgary Flames came calling.

Similar to the Sharks in 1997, the Flames had largely been wandering in the wilderness prior to Sutter’s arrival. The club hadn’t seen the post-season for nearly a decade and despite the growing abilities of Jarome Iginla, the mood around Calgary had settled into one of resigned hopelessness.

The fanbase had seen former franchise icons Al MacInnis, Doug Gilmour, Mike Vernon, Joe Nieuwendyk and Theoren Fleury escape to greener pastures as the club’s fortunes turned from success to failure in the mid-90’s. The stars were replaced mostly by failed experiments, ill-fated draft picks and the budget brothers of established NHL difference makers. Rob Neidermayer and Valeri Bure were elevated to positions of prominence in Calgary if only because of the dearth of other options. 

The Flames perpetual rebuild was dubbed "The Young Guns" era by the franchise in a futile effort to sell hope to the fanbase, one that was rapidly falling into apathy in spite of a solid, enduring foundation of grass-roots support. That particular marketing campaign became synonymous with the dark-ages of the organization and remains a pejorative term to this day in Calgary.

The lackluster results and sky-rocketing payroll expenses conspired to deliver large splashes of red-ink to the Flames books, limiting the club’s player budget. Nonetheless, former GM Craig Button struggled against such constraints and made a number of noteworthy moves in an effort to revive the team’s ailing fortunes and credibility. He acquired Chris Drury and Roman Turek from the Avalanche and Blues respectively, but the pair flopped in the face of unrealistic expectations.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Calgary continued to flounder in the Western Conference basement.

Until, that is, the arrival of Darryl Sutter.

Ostensibly hired to replace Gilbert behind the bench, Sutter would soon depose the aforementioned Button as well, emerging as the club’s head coach and GM in 2003-04.


On a number of occasions, including the recent press conference in which he announced Sutter’s resignation, team president Ken King used the word "genius" to describe Darryl. That superlative seemed an apt one through the early years of his reign, when Sutter almost singlehandedly orchestrated the Flames return to competitiveness and respectability.

Everything Darryl touched turned to gold initially: modest deals to acquire marginal supporting-role type players like Marcus Nilson, Rhett Warrener, Chris Simon and Vile Nieminen seemed uncanny and prophetic when the rag-tag bunch made the 2004 Stanley Cup run.

Not that Darryl’s Midas touch was limited to the roster’s edges. Inside of his first three seasons, Sutter would perpetrate three of the most lop-sided trades in recent memory: Miikka Kiprusoff for a second round pick, Daymond Langkow for Oleg Saprykin and Denis Gauthier and Kristian Huselius for Steve Montador and Dustin Johner.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

All three players would become difference makers of varying degrees for the Flames going forward and the best asset Sutter surrendered in the deals was Montador (or technincally, Marc-Edouard Vlasic, who was chosen by the Sharks with the Flames second round pick).

The Kipper, Langkow and Huselius moves were masterful in retrospect given their success, but were also low-risk, high-reward gambles at the time. Langkow was a former first round pick and an established 20+ goal scorer who had spent the previous three seasons doing the heavy lifting for a bad club in Phoenix.

He became one of the three best forwards on the club the instant he was acquired. Huselius, although suffering a rotten season under the baleful glare of Mike Keenan at the time of the trade, had a solid history of offensive numbers behind him with two consecutive 20 goal seasons as a rookie and sophomore in Florida. Juice also led the Swedish Elite League in scoring during the lock-out with 49 points in just 34 games.

The team he played for – Linkoping HC – also featured Brendan Morrison, Mike Knuble and Johan Franzen, none of whom approached Huselius’ scoring rate. The lanky Swede formed a potent duo with Daymond Langkow in Calgary and was the Flames most efficient producer of points on the power-play during his time in town. 

Kipper remains the grand slam of Darryl Sutter moves, however. Picked up to fill a void caused by injuries to Roman Turek and Jamie McLennan, Kiprusoff was relegated to a third string goalie in San Jose thanks to their wealth of options (Nabokov and a still functional Vesa Toskala) as well as the 20-game cold stretch in 2002 that saw Darryl fired as coach and Kipper himself fall out of favor in the Sharks organization.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Sutter reached back through his portal of former allegiances (something he would repeat often as the Flames GM) and plucked what was to become the best goalie in the league for the following two+ seasons for the price of a single, second round draft pick. The familiarity meant that Sutter was no doubt aware of Kiprusoff’s physical abilities as well as the solid pedigree that saw him post impressive numbers in both the Finnish Elite League and the AHL.


Of course, Sutter’s influence stretched beyond front office negotiations and player acquisition in the formative years. Coach and figurehead, Darryl firmly steered a moribund organization back to vitality by imbuing the players and franchise with his virtually patented contempt for losing.

As the Flames atrophied from champion to also-rans to bottom feeders, the club spent the latter part of the 90’s with tattered hopes gripped in nervous hands, unendingly burdened with expectations of failure. The fans and players had grown used to hoping for the best, but expecting the worst. The path that led back to success was ill-rendered and, like an unobtainable desire, best forgotten.

Sutter’s arrival signaled an attitudinal change. Merely hoping to win was no longer acceptable. The grim scowl and taciturn manner that was both a signature and an indictment by the end of his time in Calgary was, in fact, a welcome and celebrated signal to Flames fans when he was hired: here was a man who detested failure and would brook no acceptance of it.

He sketched his contempt across his face without apology and communicated it to his players and the press constantly. He instituted policies that became pillars upon which the Flame’s early success were built: always expect to beat your closest rivals (Edmonton Oilers) and never play an easy game in your own building. Cliches and the basest of expectations upon first glance, but they were policies enacted with firm, unbending expectations that they be met.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Behind the bench, Sutter molded a motley collection of plumbers into a fierce, aggressive, thoroughly unpleasant opponent. In 2003-04, featuring little more than Iginla, Regehr, Kipper and a host of third liners, the club finished with 94 points and a +24 goal differential. Much of that can probably be hung on Kipper’s .933 SV%, but the truth is the Flames only allowed 25.5 shots against per game that year (fifth best in the league) and despite their rather lackluster forward corps finished with a positive shot differential as well (+1.9/game).

The Flames trapped fiercely with Sutter at the helm and took full advantage of the lax obstruction rules prior to the lock-out. During one particular pounding of the Bruins that season, I remember a member of the Boston organization (coach or player, can’t recall) remarking ruefully "all they do is ice the puck". And that wasn’t too far from the truth. Darryl Sutter’s Flames turned the neutral zone into a quagmire and the corners into dungeons of woe.

Everyone finished checks and they hit to hurt. They hooked. They held. They crowded the ice surface with sweat and violence. Everyone hated playing them. It was a welcome change for Flames fans after years of Calgary being perceived as "the easy W" on the schedule of their rivals. They followed up in 2005-06 by winning the division in roughly the same manner, although the crack down on obstruction put a dampener on some of the rough stuff.

The club’s overall talent remained humble outside a few of the cornerstone players, but the Flames were fiercely competitive on a nightly basis.

Of course, the culmination of Sutter’s coaching, attitude and roster changes was the fabled cup run of 2003-04. While simply making the post-season was a momentous event that year, the city exploded in rapture when the Flames unexpectedly made it past the first round and beyond.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

After all, the last time the club had won a playoff series was 1989 – the year of it’s only championship. Long dormant memories of success were awakened. New fans were carved from a once sleepy market. Hope for the present and the future blossomed in the hearts of Flames faithful for the first time since the team started routinely falling to lower seeds in the early ’90s.

It was a revolution. A renaissance. And a single man seemed to be the heart and cause of the re-awakening.

  • T&A4Flames

    Good read. I for one applaud D. Sutter for his time here. Regardless of how the last year and half went, he was the catalyst to the expectations this city, organization and team now have. He quickly transformed a dismal organization into a contender. He, like the rest of us, wanted to win now. We traded the future to take a run at it, it failed. I don’t think it is an easy thing trying to build a championship team but Darryl gave us 6 years of playoff hockey; for the most part as a true contender. It was time for fresh blood but still, thank you Darryl Sutter for trying.

  • T&A4Flames

    Nice piece Kent.

    Maybe this is coming up in your next post, but one other part of the Sutter “aura” in terms of turning around the public perception of the team was that this was going to be a team based on Western Canadian, primarily Albertan, players with the WHL mentality and philosophy. Where he couldn’t find the Western Canadian player for a spot, he looked for those that had the same kind of mentality.

    This philosophy of team building largely corresponded with the city of Calgary experiencing something of a coming of age during the economic boom of 2004 to 2008. As a community Calgary became much more vocal and forceful in asserting the benefits of economic and political beliefs that are more mainstream in Calgary than in other parts of North America. The vision of an Albertan GM and coach, bringing the hometown type of boys home to whoop the tar out of whatever outside opposition came in really resonated in the community at that time.

    Aside from his early success, this overall method of team building the image of the Flames was one of the reasons he was so revered in the City.

  • Gange

    It’s always good to look back on the reality of Darryl’s tenure.

    I don’t hate the guy, he did some good things. He did however fall off the rails of late. Meaning the last couple years.

    I mean really, who signs Jokinen AGAIN?? As if he knew he was getting turfed decided to give a NMC to him as his final HA HA!

    Touche Darryl, Touche.

  • I think it was during the latest HNIC boradcast that they were discussing that fact that Darryl and Brent haven’t spoken and that Darryl isn’t returning anyones texts/messages…Elliot Friedman had a blog about how Darryl was looking to have Brent fired and MGT ended up firing him instead. What a little soap opera we have here!

  • marty

    i agree it was time for a change but the man no matter how he did it loved this organization and the city. he did what he could and yes it unraveled the last 1.5 yrs but i admire the passion he had for the team.

  • marty

    Nice Work Kent, an enjoyable read, looking forward to the upcoming additions.

    I always liked Darryl, if for nothing more than the fact that he did whatever he could to try and win now. Some GM’s might be scared off by making trades, but not Darryl. It was exciting knowing that at anytime the Flames could bring in a star player.

    Watching HNIC on the weekend, and of course They talked about blowing up the flames, and rebuilding, then they went on to burn edmonton about how they should be better and how much the suck. Even though a year ago everyone expected the oilers rebuild to take years, one year later they are impatient and demanding more. Same will happen here in Calgary. All the media want a blow up and rebuild cause it makes for good conversation. And then something to continually rag on when the rebuilding team struggles.

    I can now say I am fully against a blow up, but significant changes should be made ( get rid of Brent, “who calls a T.O after the Isles score two, and then put the Kotalik line out????”

    Anyway thats my rant, I appreciate the review of Darryl’s work that your doing Kent! Keep’em Coming!

      • BobB

        As much as I agree that Kiprusoff deserves a Lion’s share of the individual on-ice credit for the teams success since the lockout. One guy on the ice is never going to surpass the strength of a well-built team.

        Unfortunately, when Sutter took the Flames, he took them when they existed in a deficit. From there, he built a respectable team out of very little. Kiprusoff was a key acquisition, but I do doubt that even Sutter knew exactly what he was getting, otherwise Kipper wouldn’t have been in the situation he was in San Jose. Sutter also, unfortunately, suffered the unlucky fate of having two prime years, sliced into one with the effect of the lockout.

        Kiprusoff does deserve credit after joining the team and since that time putting up arguably the third best performance in the NHL since 03/04 regardless of how you prefer to combine measures of goalie performance (whether it be evsv%, wins, vezina’s, gaa, stanley cup runs, big saves, lucky rabbits feet or record-year stats.)

        However, as good as Kipper was, he hasn’t stopped shots at the same rate as Vokoun (from mostly worse teams) or Luongo (from mostly better teams) and much better than Fleury (who has had more Cup success)

        I don’t know the best measure of team effects on goaltending or vice-versa, and the ones I have seen have massive deficiencies, but I do know the entire 21 player roster is more important than any 1 goalie on any team.

        For a re-birth of the Calgary Flames team Darryl deserves a hell of a lot of credit and it’s more than just getting lucky with the Kipper trade.

        • the-wolf

          Darryl did 4 great things: Kipper, Huselius, Cammaleri and Langkow (I didn’t then and still don’t like the original Tanguay signing).

          He also vowed to get younger and faster and instead got older and slower. He got rid of a young, effective blueline group (especially Lydman) seemingly over and over, always trying to make it better with not enough focus or resources spent on the forward group. And it was his acquisition of veterans that killed this team. Which is also what bothers me so much about him – look at those names, they have 2 things in common when acquired. They were young (fairly) and skilled. How do you seemingly have a knack for stealing young, skilled players away from other teams and then proceed to ship half of them out due to some antiquated, old-school philosophy. Or did I just answer my own question?

          It’s what’s bothered me about this team ever since Brian Sutter coached here. This insistence on a rough-tough, grim-and-gritty, western Canadian, down-and-dirty, yee-hah squad of good-‘ol boys. That’s not at all what our teams were in the glory years of the 80’s. Neither was our management group. I desperately miss when this team was all about class and skill – upstairs and on the ice.

          Now we’re run by a universally despised ex-newspaperman (I hear the fron office at the ‘Dome is ready to mutiny)whose idea of leadership was to give dictatorship powers to an out-of-touch, egotistical, arrogant mad man.

          Though really, it probably started with letting Risebrough run the team, a guy who shares a lot in common with Darryl. Does this ownership group never learn from the past?

          Yeah, times had changed and things were difficult, but if the team had gone through a proper rebuild then (as they should now), we could have traded away all of those assets for a fortune in picks and prospects. Will the ownership group learn from the past this time?

          • BobB

            Yeah, times had changed and things were difficult, but if the team had gone through a proper rebuild then (as they should now), we could have traded away all of those assets for a fortune in picks and prospects.

            I get the sense you would prefer that the Flames were perpetually in the same shitty state that the Oilers, Islanders, and Atlanta have been in.

            I don’t see very many teams that have had more success than the Flames over the last 7 years that are built on youth and prospects.

            Chicago and Pittsburgh….sure….and?

            If you want that, be my guest. I don’t wanna see “young guns 2.0”

            Darryl and management all stated their vision: “Trade and build to be competitive each and every year.”

            We all loved it and cheered when we went to the cup final and won the division. You’d trade that for a re-build?

            Darryl COULD have blown it all up when he arrived. He could have. I’m glad he didn’t.

            We’ve had to overcome a prime year for the core being lost to the lockout.

            We’ve had to endure our #1 centre having a career ending injury.

            If you want to believe the media, we’ve had to endure our best pick/prospect in decades in Dion become incompatible with the team.

            How would the Canucks look in 2012/2013 if next year was wiped out due to lockout? Henrik was injured for the full 12/13 season with a neck injury and Kesler had to be traded mid-season because of “dressing room issues”??

  • i was at that boston game, obviously. one of my favorite all-time memories.

    boston was mired in an ugly slump having won just two of their previous 12 games, and there were, being generous 12,000 people in a building that holds 17,565.

    guy next to me saw my flames jersey and said they didn’t stand a chance and would i like to bet 100 on the outcome? i was broke at the time, so i don’t know why i said yes.

    it was 2-0 through one and the flames just punished the bruins for the entire first 20 minutes, slowing the game to a crawl. it was wonderfully ugly. oliwa got in two separate fights.

    when calgary went up 3 midway through the second, the guy handed me a hundred dollar bill and left. i ate many nachos that night.

  • SmellOfVictory

    great piece, kent, i look forward to the next five.

    i presume you’re going chronologically cause daz made a couple of genius moves later in his tenure; rene bourque for a 2nd, flipping tanguay for cammalleri at the ’08 draft, and letting theoren fleury play the ’09 preseason. if this is the only one exhibiting his genius, you might’ve missed those…

  • It’s a shame that Sutter killed all the fun on this team. I mean, I still remember the one game vs. Anaheim in 2002 or so…

    You know, the one where Berube ran Giguere, Sawyer ran Vernon, and then a brawl is set off, continuing each time after the puck drop. Regehr fights, Iginla fights, there were 4 fights at once, 2 or 3 more fights, etc etc.

    Aaaaahhhhh, the days of Berube, Lydman, Niedermayer, Petrovicky, etc etc etc.

    At least that team showed heart when we got pounded.

  • wattree

    Sutter (and a strong Canadian dollar) saved this city from losing it’s team. He deserves a thanks for that. And then some time in an asylum for the last two years. But it was that same attitude of not accepting defeat that got him in trouble.

    Here’s hoping that whoever is next has their head on straight. I think this city is willing to accept a few years of good regular seasons without sacrificing the future to win it all. We’ve seen where that gets us.