Random Thoughts – What’s Wrong With the Flames?

random thoughts

Usually I tackle number of topics with these pieces, but this time around I’m going to look at just one: the Flames terrible start.

It’s a stiff shock to the system to see Calgary struggle out of the gate. While there were a few (okay, more than a few) red flags about the club’s Cinderella turn last year, Brad Treliving’s impressive off-season gave hope that the team could avoid a crash back down to earth. Unfortunately, that seems rather inevitable now. 

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

So what the hell is going on here?

1.) The Percentages Crashed

The Flames made the post-season despite lousy underlying numbers last year for a handful of reasons. One of them was a better than average PDO of 101.0 (5on5 SH% and SV%), which was mostly driven by the second highest even strength shooting percentage in the league (8.6%). 

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

The problem is the reverse is true so far this year. Calgary is suffering from both terrible puck stopping (87.8%) and shooting (5.2%) efficiency, resulting in a PDO of just 93.0.

Flames fans can take solace in the fact that there’s no way the club is actually this bad. PDO’s for NHL teams usually settle between 98-101 by the end of the year. Nobody is really 93.0 bad. This is a remarkably dry stretch which is enervating their lacklustre play even further.

2.) The Penalty Differential Has Gone Away  

The Flames were the most disciplined team in the NHL last year. That meant they got to spend almost 2 more hours on the PP and than on the PK, an advantage that further propped up their results. 

In 9 games this year, Calgary has actually taken four more penalties than they’ve drawn. At this rate, they’ll have a penalty differential of -36 by the end of year.

3.) 3rd Period Scoring Has Evaporated

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Few teams could match Calgary’s potency in the final frame in 2014-15. Their 99 3rd period goals were tied for best in the NHL and was a big reason the Flames were able to stick around in so many games last year. 

So far this season? Just 5 third period tallies in 9 games, which makes it a lot harder to so frequently stage comebacks. Although to be fair, the fact of the matter is Calgary isn’t scoring a lot in any period so far.

4.) Hartley Still Doesn’t Have a Hard Minutes Option 

For many years now, the Flames have struggled to put together a forward line capable of playing against the other stars in the league. The Monahan line scored enough to paper over the fact that they didn’t drive play last season, but that hasn’t carried over to this year (see the note about SH% above). 

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

There were hopes that the kids would take enough of step forward this year that they would be able to hang with the big boys (without a giant SH% bump or zone start push from the coach), but that hasn’t materialized. 

In fact, quite the opposite. Sean Monahan’s underlying numbers have fallen back down to rates comparable to his rookie season, despite Hartley still giving his line the easiest relative starting position amongst any forward group. Monahan’s relative corsi rate of -2.68/60 is the fourth worst amongst regular forwards on the team. What’s interesting is that Johnny Gaudreau’s numbers are superior (he’s in the positives relatively speaking) even though they have played together for most of the season. 

That matches the eye test as well. Johnny seems to be the kid who has taken a step forward, but Monahan looks to be running in mud (or going backwards). Since the latter is the centre on the line, he’s going to have a big drag on the unit’s two-way play. 

That leaves the Flames coaching staff with difficult choices. Either they try to continue manage Monahan’s ice usage to try to give him the high ground and favourable match-ups. That obviously makes it really difficult to give the kids a lot of ice time and it presents issues on the road then the club doesn’t have last change. In addition, this means the other forward units will have be completely buried to continue to give Monahan an advantage. That will, of course, sink the club’s shaky secondary scoring, and is problematic now that the Flames are trying to bring another kid along as well in Sam Bennett.

The other thing they can do is try to elevate Mikael Backlund to the top line and go PvP, which will free up Monahan to face much easier ice time further down the depth chart. Unfortunately, while Backlund is definitely a more accomplished player at driving play north (he leads the forwards in possession again this season), he’s a mediocre offensive player at best. Ideally, he should be playing a complementary role where he’s not relied upon to be a club’s primary attack. 

None of this would be an issue if the Monahan line was dominating (or at least breaking even) in their current circumstances. They’re underwater, unfortunately, leaving Hartley with a head scratcher from a match-up perspective. Unless they start scoring on more than 10% of their shots at 5on5, the Monahan line will be more liability than asset at even strength. 

5.) The Blueline is Ragged 

Who knew the loss of TJ Brodie would be so dire? It certainly wasn’t supposed to be with a healthy Mark Giordano and freshly signed Dougie Hamilton in the fold.

Unfortunately, the captain started the season covered in rust and the 22-year old erstwhile Bruin has looked he has never played in the league before. With the two big guns struggling to keep their heads above water early, far too much pressure has fallen on the rest of the D corps. And as we’ve mentioned around here extensively, Kris Russell, Dennis Wideman, Ladislav Smid and Deryk Engelland are all 3rd pairing options on a contender (at best). 

The team’s inability to find a hard minutes match-up option up front has no doubt been exacerbated by the hiccups on the back-end. Things might get a lot easier once Gio finds his legs (seems to be almost there already), Brodie returns and Hamilton acclimates to his new environment. 

6.) The Systems Need Fixing

The Flames transition game has been dreadful to watch most nights this season. It’s incredibly difficult to establish any sort of consistent pressure in this league if you can’t exit your zone with efficiency. Far too often the Flames find themselves stopped at the opposition blueline, turning back at the redline or icing the puck. 

Beyond players simply not executing on plays (which is definitely a problem all by itself), Calgary’s scheme seems to be too focused on the rope-a-dope. By which I mean a lot of collapsing around the net when pressed and a reliance on 80-foot stretch passes when breaking out. 

The stretch pass has been especially problematic. It’s a very difficult play to execute consistently with speed – if the passer is hesitant, the exiting forwards find themselves stationary and easily stuffed when the puck arrives. If the pass isn’t directly on the stick, it results in a give away with the forwards skating the wrong way or, of course, an icing call. 

In addition, As Elliott Friedman notes here, the Flames have become known for the stretch pass and teams are learning how to clog the neutral zone in order in response: 

“If the opponent can stay above them in the neutral zone, the effectiveness of the long pass is neutralized. Teams who stay patient can counter-punch. Worst case is, you are back to retrieve a tipped puck first.”

Stretch passes are bit like long bombs in football. When they connect, they look spectacular and can result in huge gains. Unfortunately, they are also relatively high risk and therefore should only be attempted opportunistically (or when desperate). 

To stretch this analogy a bit further, the Flames need to develop a run game. Having your forwards flee the zone and hang around the opposition blueline almost every time you try to exit is resulting in the Flames defensemen struggling to make meaningful transition plays. Calgary gives the puck away far too often between the blue lines and it’s sewering their attack at 5on5. 


The enduring hope was the Flames would begin to improve their possession rate this year, meaning they wouldn’t have to rely on uncanny shooting rates or third period comebacks this time around. Unfortunately, everything that drove their unlikely success last year has collapsed, while other factors we assumed would improve organically have stalled, which means they still boast some of the worst outshooting ratios in the league (47.2%, 26th overall).

At some point the Flames percentages are going to rebound because, as mentioned, no one is as bad as they seem right now. However, the team also needs to find ways to improve the various other issues raised here. That sort of improvement will lie with both the players (better execution, more development from the kids) and the coaches (adjustment in match-ups and strategies). 

Otherwise, the club might just have the sort of the season we all were expecting last year. 

  • Derzie

    I generally like Kent’s writing a lot but this is another thinly veiled ‘i told you so’ from the stats crowd. If this gets written about the Flames, then do one on Anaheim as well. The season sample size is too small to draw any conclusions or even hint at a root cause. Once both teams are stable and consistent in their personnel (months of play, not weeks), then we can start to look at all the backing numbers. Corsi/PDO heroes Anaheim and Corsi/PDO bums Calgary are both pretty terrible right now.

  • piscera.infada

    “At some point the Flames percentages are going to rebound because, as mentioned, no one is as bad as they seem right now.”

    The same can be said for last year. No one is as good as they seem right now and look at what happened. They kept it up for ONE WHOLE SEASON!

    Crash! Exactly like Colorado.

    It will be a long and slow process to return to last years glory.

    • Cfan in Vic

      Last years high percentages were not proportional to this years low percentages. It’s not like they’ve earned this years bad play by getting some luck last year.

      There’s a middle ground that will be found, and it’ll be a lot closer to last year than what we’ve seen so far. I don’t see a crash happening, just not success to quite the same degree.

  • ChinookArchYYC

    Just looked at the project lines for tonight’s game.

    Joe Colburne is now a first line winger? What a joke, Colburne is at best a 4th liner. He’s been only okay in the last 2 games, and in no way should be elevated to first line duty. Monahan is already struggling, this will not help.

      • piscera.infada

        I didn’t trash it, but putting Gaudreau with Bennett is a proposition I’ve been asking about for a couple games now. If that’s done, who do you place with Monahan? It’s basically a toss-up between Colborne and Raymond, no?

        • ClayBort

          Oh I didn’t mean your reply, sorry. I was using the Props vs. Trashes score as a poll of sentiment.

          I also don’t mind breaking up the top line. My top 6 would look more like this:

          Gaudreau Bennett Frolik

          Hudler Monahan Jones

          Or test Backlund on the wing:

          Gaudreau Bennett Frolik

          Backlund Monahan Hudler

          I think Jones is more worthy of the extra workload than Joelbort or Raymond.

          • piscera.infada

            I like the Hudler-Monahan-Jones, concept. I’ve never really understood Hartley’s reluctance to give Jones more of a role. He’s been good this season.

          • ClayBort

            He’s been underrated for quite some time.

            Reminiscent of David Moss. His role should be expanded in some fashion, be it 5on5 or otherwise.

            He’d probably be better in front of the net on the PP than Colborne is.

    • Johnny Goooooooaldreau

      I guess the joke is on you, because not only did Colborne play well but I think Monahan had his best game all season. In addition, ditto for Bennett. The top two lines last night played well and hopefully we’ll see more to come.

    • Well, I’ll defend Brodie here – he hasn’t played a single game yet.

      Offense is certainly an issue. Really, even the guys counted on for primary offense have been mostly absent with one or two exceptions. It’s been almost a team wide power outage.

    • SmellOfVictory

      Hamilton and Backlund I’ll agree with. Hamilton has been his own personal tire fire, and Backlund isn’t putting up any numbers (although he’s at least playing solid defensively still).

      Brodie is injured, so that’s obviously unavoidable. Bennett is a rookie and shouldn’t have been counted on for anything. Bouma is a 4th liner (3rd liner if we’re being generous) and anyone who expected him to provide offence must be high. Ferland is also new to the NHL, and isn’t likely to produce at more than a 3rd line rate. Frolik has been producing at close to his career rate, so I don’t think there’s anything to complain about, there.

      • SmellOfVictory

        I think all were counted on. Bouma had 16 goals last year. If the ones left in the lineup don’t start scoring, it’s not going to get any better. A second goal versus the Rangers would have changed the whole complexion of that game. Right now, we aren’t putting teams in a position where they have to change their game plan.

  • Backlund with Gaudreau and Huder should help increase Backlunds production just by the nature of who he’s playing with. If they can develop some chemistry. IN fact Mony was soo good last year because Hudler and Johnny carried the play he benefited from that.

    Match that line against top lines should be more capable of shutdown minutes with backs in the middle.

    Drop Monahan down a line and put him between Bennett and Frolik. See if there’s anything there.

    If Backlund line has to go off and opposing coach keeps his top line out there you put on Stajan Jones and Raymond and then pull them off as soon as the other top line goes off follow up with Mony line – there’s your secondary scoring matchup.

    It’s called coaching… Hartley doesnt’ seem to understand this.

  • piscera.infada

    Kent, this is perfection.

    As for the stretch pass: I have noticed the Flames are resistant to carry the puck in, which is crazy because we have so many capable skaters who can do it very well: Gio, Hamilton, Gaudreau to name a few. I really think its a combination of undisciplined penalties, and too many passes on the attack.

    Thank God Brodie’s back!

  • CofRed4Life

    One thing that constantly frustrates me is the line mixing/blending Hartley does mid-game. It really gives the players little to no time to develop chemistry with other players. Think about last year, how good Brodano and Hudreanahan were. It’s because they were given so much time together (especially Hudler and Gaudreau). This allows players to learn to work together. If Bob keeps constantly switching lineups during the game, there’s no chance for this.

    End rant.

    Great article Kent. I think you sum up well a lot of the things we’ve been seeing this season.

  • SmellOfVictory

    #4: I like the PvP idea. No, Backlund isn’t a spectacular offensive producer, but if the Flames start rolling the top three lines with roughly equal ice time, the only thing Hartley has to worry about is giving Backs the hard matchups. The first line’s TOI shouldn’t drop too badly, which in turn shouldn’t affect team scoring too much. Plus, if Backlund is on the ice more getting the puck into the offensive zone, it allows Hartley more opportunities to change on the Monahan line once the zone has been gained (or for o-zone faceoffs).

  • ChinookArchYYC

    Brandon Bollig has 33 minutes of penalties in 8 games. He averages 9 minutes a game, that’s a full 28% of all Flames penalty minutes. 1 – 2 PK’s per game because of Bollig, at a time the Flames PK unit is struggling, and Flames goalies are not able to bail them out.

    BTW, he was getting 8 minutes of TOI in the first 2 games, so Hartley seems to trust him even more lately.

  • Matty Franchise Jr

    Sean “Murder” Monahan got a part time A this season didn’t he? Maybe that’s messing with his head, gripping the stick too tight and what not.

  • SmellOfVictory

    There is one explanation.

    On April 22, Brandon Bollig shaved of his play-off beard. This clearly angered the Hockey Gods.

    Since that time the Flames are 4-12 with only 1 regulation win.

    To appease the Hockey Gods the Flames could start an opening line brawl with a John Torterella coached team (apparently they like this). Unfortunately they don’t play the Blue Jackets until January 21. Maybe the team could hold a practice using sticks hand carved from willow and aspen, frozen horse turds for pucks and sears catalogues for pads. It seems drastic but something must be done.

  • Johnny Goooooooaldreau

    Monahan feeds off of his line mates and looks to finish off plays. He isn’t very creative, but is a good scorer. (Boring Scoring Sean Monahan) I know the top line has as many points as the rest of the team put together, but Sean is only on pace for 40 points (Backlund Dream territory)

    I would like to see Bennett play with Gaudreau as he can also make things happen and those two buzzing around making things happen would at least be entertaining to watch. They would draw some penalties, and cause lots of disruption on the forecheck while being able to do something to worry their opponents.

    Put Ferland with them and you would really have a buzzsaw unit.