logo

Here’s how every NHL arena was funded

alt
Photo credit:Sergei Belski / USA Today Sports
Ryan Pike
6 years ago
Professional sports can be a very profitable endeavour. But it’s also expensive, particularly because one of the key inputs for having a professional sports franchise is often a building for games to be played in. The old saying is “you’ve gotta spend money to make money,” but when it comes to arenas and stadiums, whose money is being spent?
In light of the never-ending saga of the Calgary Flames and their arena, we dug into the murky corners of Wikipedia to answer a question: Just whose money went into building the 31 current NHL arenas?

A handy table

(Disclaimer: Let’s not lie to ourselves here, every building gets some public money spent on it, even if it’s tax breaks, infrastructure tie-ins or land. When we discuss “Public Money” here, we mean that governmental bodies had to fork over a significant portion of the capital outlay for the building.)
CityOpenedOwnerPublic Money?
Detroit, MI2017Downtown Development AuthorityYes
Edmonton, AB2016City of EdmontonYes
Paradise, NV2016AEG/MGMNo
Brooklyn, NY2012Brooklyn Arena Local Development Corp.Yes
Pittsburgh, PA2010Sports & Exhibition Authority of Pittsburgh and Alleghany CountyYes
Newark, NJ2007Newark Housing AuthorityYes
Winnipeg, MB2004True North Sports & EntertainmentNo
Glendale, AZ2003City of GlendaleYes
Dallas, TX2001City of DallasYes
Columbus, OH2000Nationwide Insurance/Dispatch Publishing Group (originally)No
St. Paul, MN2000City of St. PaulYes
Toronto, ON1999Maple Leaf Sports and EntertainmentNo
Denver, CO1999Kroenke Sports and EntertainmentNo
Raleigh, NC1999Centennial AuthorityYes
Los Angeles, CA1999LA Arena Company (AEG)No
Sunrise, FL1998Broward CountyYes
Washington, DC1997Monumental Sports and EntertainmentNo
Tampa, FL1996Tampa Sports AuthorityYes
Montreal, QC1996Molson familyNo
Nashville, TN1996Sports Authority of Nashville and Davidson CountyYes
Ottawa, ON1996Capital Sports PropertiesNo
Buffalo, NY1996Erie CountyYes
Philadelphia, PA1996Comcast SpectacorNo
Vancouver, BC1995Canucks Sports and EntertainmentNo
Boston, MA1995Delaware NorthNo
St. Louis, MO1994City of St. LouisYes
Chicago, IL1994United Center Joint VentureNo
Anaheim, CA1993City of AnaheimYes
San Jose, CA1993City of San JoseYes
Calgary, AB1983City of CalgaryYes
New York, NY1968Madison Square Garden CompanyNo
Let’s break this down a bit…

Primarily privately funded buildings

Teams built their own buildings primarily out of their own pockets in every Canadian market (except for Calgary and Edmonton) as well as the major American markets (plus Vegas and Columbus).

Public money tied to expansion/relocation

Teams received significant public contributions to bring an NHL team to town in Calgary, San Jose, Anaheim, Nashville, Tampa, Minnesota and Carolina. (In Calgary’s case, the Olympic discussions also played a big part, but it’s unlikely they would’ve built an arena only for the Olympics without an NHL club.)

They were worried team would leave

Public funds were provided to contribute to new arenas for St. Louis, Buffalo and Glendale, in part due to concerns that the teams would leave town without a new home. (The Blues had almost moved to Saskatoon in 1983 and the Kiel Center’s construction, combined with new local ownership, helped cement the team’s roots.)

The buildings were meant to revitalize downtown

Four cities with concerns about how sketchy their downtown areas were sunk considerable public funds into shiny arenas to spur development: Detroit, Edmonton, Brooklyn and Newark.

None of the above

Dallas seems to be the exception to the rule. The Stars played for a few seasons in Dallas before they and the Mavericks started chatting about a new arena. The new arena was roughly a mile or so away from Reunion Arena, and essentially moved to a different part of downtown. Public funds went into the building, but the situation doesn’t fit the usual template.

Check out these posts...