Nation Sites
The Nation Network
FlamesNation has no direct affiliation to the Calgary Flames, Calgary Sports and Entertainment, NHL, or NHLPA
Clubs not Wild

By Kent Wilson
Feb 27, 2009, 12:33 ESTUpdated: Oct 8, 2009, 01:38 EDT

Goony goo-goo
Is there a bigger misnomer in the league than the Minnesota Wild? I mean, there are some odd, nonsensical team names like the Penguins or Ducks (seriously – what’s with naming hockey teams after soft, defenseless birds?) but I think “the Wild” is the only completely ironic one of the bunch.
Aside from the very Sasquatch-like Derek Boogaard, there is nothing (and has never been anything) Wild about the Minnesota Wild. They are, in fact, antiseptically un-wild. They are the anti-Wild. The flip. The inverse. The negative. A pocket protector would be a more appropriate symbol for this club I think. A t-square or graphing calculator. Scaled blueprints. Stereo instructions.
This is not necessarily an indictment of their play or style. Part of me admires the fact that Lemaire can keep such a rigid hold over his players. There’s something to be said for a coach whose teams always limit scoring chances against while taking so few penalties. On a purely theoretical level, that is to be admired surely.
But if Risebrough insists on keeping Lemaire around and furnishing him with a team full of pluggers, then a name change is in order. The Minnesota bland. The Twin City accountants. Perhaps “the Trappers” would be the shortest bridge between their current monichar and a new, more appropriate one, yes?
Anyways, go Flames!
Breaking News
- What could the Flames forward lines look like next season?
- How much of a draft steal is Flames prospect Ethan Wyttenbach?
- What could the Flames defence pairs look like next season?
- FlamesNation Mailbag: Talking offer sheets, prospects and the upcoming schedule
- NHL Notebook: Connor Bedard signs five-year extension

