FlamesNation has no direct affiliation to the Calgary Flames, Calgary Sports and Entertainment, NHL, or NHLPA
Clubs not Wild

By Kent Wilson
Feb 27, 2009, 12:33 ESTUpdated: Oct 8, 2009, 01:38 EDT

Goony goo-goo
Is there a bigger misnomer in the league than the Minnesota Wild? I mean, there are some odd, nonsensical team names like the Penguins or Ducks (seriously – what’s with naming hockey teams after soft, defenseless birds?) but I think “the Wild” is the only completely ironic one of the bunch.
Aside from the very Sasquatch-like Derek Boogaard, there is nothing (and has never been anything) Wild about the Minnesota Wild. They are, in fact, antiseptically un-wild. They are the anti-Wild. The flip. The inverse. The negative. A pocket protector would be a more appropriate symbol for this club I think. A t-square or graphing calculator. Scaled blueprints. Stereo instructions.
This is not necessarily an indictment of their play or style. Part of me admires the fact that Lemaire can keep such a rigid hold over his players. There’s something to be said for a coach whose teams always limit scoring chances against while taking so few penalties. On a purely theoretical level, that is to be admired surely.
But if Risebrough insists on keeping Lemaire around and furnishing him with a team full of pluggers, then a name change is in order. The Minnesota bland. The Twin City accountants. Perhaps “the Trappers” would be the shortest bridge between their current monichar and a new, more appropriate one, yes?
Anyways, go Flames!
Breaking News
- Scenes from practice: Flames youngsters prepare for NextGen Battle of Alberta
- Why Flames captain Mikael Backlund could have a milestone week in March
- How the Flames’ and Oilers’ prospect training camp rosters compare
- 4 Flames players whose roles could grow in Jonathan Huberdeau’s absence
- Scenes from practice: Flames prospects hit the ice for training camp

