FlamesNation has no direct affiliation to the Calgary Flames, Calgary Sports and Entertainment, NHL, or NHLPA
Flames Scoring Chances – Game 50 versus Nashville
alt
Kent Wilson
Jan 25, 2011, 00:05 ESTUpdated: Jan 25, 2011, 00:06 EST
Scoring Chances for NHL Game Number 20730
Team
Period
Time
Note
CGY
Opponent
 
NSH
1
18:38
 
7
10
18
20
33
34
8
13
25
29
35
52
5v5
NSH
1
18:37
 
7
10
18
20
33
34
8
13
25
29
35
52
5v5
CGY
1
16:56
 
4
13
17
25
33
34
8
11
29
35
55
 
5v4
CGY
1
13:49
 
7
8
12
33
34
40
8
11
27
33
35
52
5v5
CGY
1
12:05
 
5
8
12
15
34
40
6
13
20
25
35
 
5v4
CGY
1
10:29
 
4
13
17
25
33
34
8
11
29
35
55
 
5v4
CGY
1
9:47
Glencross goal
6
10
18
20
28
34
6
9
10
20
35
53
5v5
NSH
1
6:09
 
6
7
16
17
34
 
4
27
33
35
52
74
4v5
NSH
1
0:48
 
6
7
17
18
34
 
4
10
11
29
35
52
4v5
CGY
2
15:46
 
4
8
12
28
34
40
6
9
10
20
35
74
5v5
CGY
2
15:35
 
4
8
12
28
34
40
6
9
10
20
35
74
5v5
CGY
2
14:38
 
4
13
17
25
33
34
8
13
25
35
55
 
5v4
CGY
2
11:44
 
5
7
11
12
16
34
8
11
24
35
52
53
5v5
CGY
2
11:26
 
5
7
11
12
16
34
8
11
24
35
52
53
5v5
NSH
2
10:33
 
5
7
13
17
25
34
6
9
10
20
35
74
5v5
CGY
2
10:22
 
5
7
13
17
25
34
6
9
10
20
35
74
5v5
NSH
2
9:29
 
4
10
18
20
28
34
4
11
29
33
35
55
5v5
NSH
2
9:28
Legwand goal
4
10
18
20
28
34
4
11
29
33
35
55
5v5
NSH
2
9:15
 
5
6
10
18
20
34
4
11
27
33
35
55
5v5
NSH
2
9:13
 
5
6
10
18
20
34
4
11
27
33
35
55
5v5
CGY
2
6:59
Iginla goal
5
6
12
18
34
40
8
13
25
35
55
 
5v4
CGY
2
6:28
 
6
7
13
17
25
34
6
11
20
27
33
35
5v5
CGY
2
6:19
 
6
7
13
17
25
34
6
11
20
27
33
35
5v5
CGY
2
3:19
 
8
10
20
28
33
34
8
9
10
27
35
52
5v5
NSH
3
17:44
 
4
13
17
25
28
34
4
9
10
27
35
55
5v5
NSH
3
16:02
 
4
11
15
16
28
34
8
9
24
29
35
52
5v5
NSH
3
15:25
 
4
8
12
28
34
40
4
10
11
33
35
55
5v5
NSH
3
14:57
 
5
6
8
17
25
34
4
10
33
35
53
55
5v5
NSH
3
8:27
 
4
11
12
28
34
40
6
11
20
29
35
53
5v5
NSH
3
8:14
 
4
11
12
28
34
40
6
11
20
29
35
53
5v5
CGY
3
6:25
 
4
5
8
12
34
40
8
11
29
35
55
 
5v4
CGY
3
5:42
Morrison goal
4
5
8
12
34
40
8
11
29
35
55
 
5v4
CGY
3
5:27
 
6
13
17
25
28
34
6
9
10
20
33
35
5v5
NSH
3
4:44
 
7
10
18
20
33
34
8
27
35
52
53
74
5v5
#
Player
EV
PP
SH
4
J. BOUWMEESTER
17:32
2
7
5:17
5
0
4:29
0
0
5
M. GIORDANO
12:20
3
4
4:51
4
0
1:28
0
0
6
C. SARICH
13:11
4
3
0:13
1
0
3:34
0
2
7
A. PARDY
14:47
6
4
0:00
0
0
3:46
0
2
8
B. MORRISON
10:14
4
2
3:25
3
0
4:03
0
0
10
N. HAGMAN
11:57
2
7
0:16
0
0
0:00
0
0
11
M. BACKLUND
9:02
2
3
0:13
0
0
0:00
0
0
12
J. IGINLA
14:58
5
3
4:40
4
0
0:00
0
0
13
O. JOKINEN
11:11
4
2
4:07
3
0
0:00
0
0
15
T. JACKMAN
4:34
0
1
3:43
1
0
0:00
0
0
16
T. KOSTOPOULOS
8:03
2
1
0:13
0
0
2:03
0
1
17
R. BOURQUE
10:22
4
3
4:10
3
0
2:32
0
2
18
M. STAJAN
10:32
1
7
1:13
1
0
4:03
0
1
20
C. GLENCROSS
10:58
2
7
0:08
0
0
4:42
0
0
25
D. MOSS
8:19
4
3
3:49
3
0
2:25
0
0
28
R. REGEHR
16:44
5
7
0:16
0
0
6:31
0
0
33
A. BABCHUK
8:16
2
3
3:42
3
0
0:00
0
0
34
M. KIPRUSOFF
41:08
11
14
8:58
7
0
9:54
0
2
40
A. TANGUAY
12:34
3
3
4:34
4
0
0:00
0
0
Period
Totals
EV
PP
5v3 PP
SH
5v3 SH
1
5
4
2
2
3
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
2
10
5
8
5
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
7
1
7
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Totals
18
16
11
14
7
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
Flames were mostly the better team tonight, aside from sitting on the lead for the third period. They fell behind on the chance count at ES because of that, but finished in the black overall thanks to their – gasp! – PP. To be fair, the Preds took a bunch of penalties, so Calgary had a lot of tries, but they did manage to actually generate something with the man advantage for a change,
With last change and the Preds lacking a true power verus power option, Iginla’s line faced a mixed bag of opponents tonight, none of them on the level of, say, the Sedins or Kesler in Vancouver. They finished above water by all measures as a result, although marginally. Glencross and Stajan’s numbers are surprisingly bad given the fact I didn’t consider them a weak link while viewing. A lot of the damage must have been done in the third.