FlamesNation has no direct affiliation to the Calgary Flames, Calgary Sports and Entertainment, NHL, or NHLPA

Flames Scoring Chances – Game 50 versus Nashville

By Kent Wilson

Jan 25, 2011, 00:05 ESTUpdated: Jan 25, 2011, 00:06 EST

Comments

Scoring Chances for NHL Game Number 20730

Team	Period	Time	Note	CGY	Opponent
NSH	1	18:38		7	10	18	20	33	34	8	13	25	29	35	52	5v5
NSH	1	18:37		7	10	18	20	33	34	8	13	25	29	35	52	5v5
CGY	1	16:56		4	13	17	25	33	34	8	11	29	35	55		5v4
CGY	1	13:49		7	8	12	33	34	40	8	11	27	33	35	52	5v5
CGY	1	12:05		5	8	12	15	34	40	6	13	20	25	35		5v4
CGY	1	10:29		4	13	17	25	33	34	8	11	29	35	55		5v4
CGY	1	9:47	Glencross goal	6	10	18	20	28	34	6	9	10	20	35	53	5v5
NSH	1	6:09		6	7	16	17	34		4	27	33	35	52	74	4v5
NSH	1	0:48		6	7	17	18	34		4	10	11	29	35	52	4v5
CGY	2	15:46		4	8	12	28	34	40	6	9	10	20	35	74	5v5
CGY	2	15:35		4	8	12	28	34	40	6	9	10	20	35	74	5v5
CGY	2	14:38		4	13	17	25	33	34	8	13	25	35	55		5v4
CGY	2	11:44		5	7	11	12	16	34	8	11	24	35	52	53	5v5
CGY	2	11:26		5	7	11	12	16	34	8	11	24	35	52	53	5v5
NSH	2	10:33		5	7	13	17	25	34	6	9	10	20	35	74	5v5
CGY	2	10:22		5	7	13	17	25	34	6	9	10	20	35	74	5v5
NSH	2	9:29		4	10	18	20	28	34	4	11	29	33	35	55	5v5
NSH	2	9:28	Legwand goal	4	10	18	20	28	34	4	11	29	33	35	55	5v5
NSH	2	9:15		5	6	10	18	20	34	4	11	27	33	35	55	5v5
NSH	2	9:13		5	6	10	18	20	34	4	11	27	33	35	55	5v5
CGY	2	6:59	Iginla goal	5	6	12	18	34	40	8	13	25	35	55		5v4
CGY	2	6:28		6	7	13	17	25	34	6	11	20	27	33	35	5v5
CGY	2	6:19		6	7	13	17	25	34	6	11	20	27	33	35	5v5
CGY	2	3:19		8	10	20	28	33	34	8	9	10	27	35	52	5v5
NSH	3	17:44		4	13	17	25	28	34	4	9	10	27	35	55	5v5
NSH	3	16:02		4	11	15	16	28	34	8	9	24	29	35	52	5v5
NSH	3	15:25		4	8	12	28	34	40	4	10	11	33	35	55	5v5
NSH	3	14:57		5	6	8	17	25	34	4	10	33	35	53	55	5v5
NSH	3	8:27		4	11	12	28	34	40	6	11	20	29	35	53	5v5
NSH	3	8:14		4	11	12	28	34	40	6	11	20	29	35	53	5v5
CGY	3	6:25		4	5	8	12	34	40	8	11	29	35	55		5v4
CGY	3	5:42	Morrison goal	4	5	8	12	34	40	8	11	29	35	55		5v4
CGY	3	5:27		6	13	17	25	28	34	6	9	10	20	33	35	5v5
NSH	3	4:44		7	10	18	20	33	34	8	27	35	52	53	74	5v5

#	Player	EV	PP	SH
4	J. BOUWMEESTER	17:32	2	7	5:17	5	0	4:29	0	0
5	M. GIORDANO	12:20	3	4	4:51	4	0	1:28	0	0
6	C. SARICH	13:11	4	3	0:13	1	0	3:34	0	2
7	A. PARDY	14:47	6	4	0:00	0	0	3:46	0	2
8	B. MORRISON	10:14	4	2	3:25	3	0	4:03	0	0
10	N. HAGMAN	11:57	2	7	0:16	0	0	0:00	0	0
11	M. BACKLUND	9:02	2	3	0:13	0	0	0:00	0	0
12	J. IGINLA	14:58	5	3	4:40	4	0	0:00	0	0
13	O. JOKINEN	11:11	4	2	4:07	3	0	0:00	0	0
15	T. JACKMAN	4:34	0	1	3:43	1	0	0:00	0	0
16	T. KOSTOPOULOS	8:03	2	1	0:13	0	0	2:03	0	1
17	R. BOURQUE	10:22	4	3	4:10	3	0	2:32	0	2
18	M. STAJAN	10:32	1	7	1:13	1	0	4:03	0	1
20	C. GLENCROSS	10:58	2	7	0:08	0	0	4:42	0	0
25	D. MOSS	8:19	4	3	3:49	3	0	2:25	0	0
28	R. REGEHR	16:44	5	7	0:16	0	0	6:31	0	0
33	A. BABCHUK	8:16	2	3	3:42	3	0	0:00	0	0
34	M. KIPRUSOFF	41:08	11	14	8:58	7	0	9:54	0	2
40	A. TANGUAY	12:34	3	3	4:34	4	0	0:00	0	0

Period	Totals	EV	PP	5v3 PP	SH	5v3 SH
1	5	4	2	2	3	0	0	0	0	2	0	0
2	10	5	8	5	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
3	3	7	1	7	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
4	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Totals	18	16	11	14	7	0	0	0	0	2	0	0

Head to head ice

Corsi

Face-offs

Flames were mostly the better team tonight, aside from sitting on the lead for the third period. They fell behind on the chance count at ES because of that, but finished in the black overall thanks to their – gasp! – PP. To be fair, the Preds took a bunch of penalties, so Calgary had a lot of tries, but they did manage to actually generate something with the man advantage for a change,

With last change and the Preds lacking a true power verus power option, Iginla’s line faced a mixed bag of opponents tonight, none of them on the level of, say, the Sedins or Kesler in Vancouver. They finished above water by all measures as a result, although marginally. Glencross and Stajan’s numbers are surprisingly bad given the fact I didn’t consider them a weak link while viewing. A lot of the damage must have been done in the third.