FlamesNation has no direct affiliation to the Calgary Flames, Calgary Sports and Entertainment, NHL, or NHLPA
Flames Scoring Chances – Game 64 versus St. Louis
alt
Kent Wilson
Feb 27, 2011, 22:38 EST
Scoring Chances for NHL Game Number 20937
Team
Period
Time
Note
CGY
Opponent
 
CGY
1
19:08
 
15
17
18
27
33
34
12
17
20
26
27
30
5v5
STL
1
17:09
 
6
8
12
33
34
40
5
17
20
26
30
46
5v5
CGY
1
15:34
 
4
13
20
25
28
34
12
21
25
27
30
74
5v5
CGY
1
15:18
 
4
13
20
25
28
34
12
21
25
27
30
74
5v5
CGY
1
14:53
 
4
5
10
11
16
34
20
28
30
33
36
55
5v5
STL
1
12:24
 
4
13
17
25
33
34
10
21
30
33
46
 
5v4
CGY
1
11:46
 
4
8
12
20
27
34
20
30
33
42
46
 
5v4
CGY
1
10:34
 
8
12
20
33
34
40
5
15
20
27
30
 
5v4
CGY
1
9:15
 
6
10
16
18
27
34
12
22
25
28
30
36
5v5
STL
2
14:08
 
5
6
11
16
17
34
15
22
28
30
33
42
5v5
STL
2
13:47
 
4
11
16
17
28
34
15
22
28
30
33
42
5v5
STL
2
13:20
 
4
8
12
17
27
34
12
21
25
27
30
74
5v5
CGY
2
9:41
 
4
5
13
17
20
34
5
21
25
30
46
74
5v5
STL
2
8:03
 
6
13
28
34
40
 
12
20
25
27
30
 
4v4
CGY
2
1:25
 
6
13
15
28
34
40
12
21
25
27
30
74
5v5
CGY
3
19:14
 
4
8
25
28
34
40
5
21
25
30
46
74
5v5
STL
3
18:12
 
5
6
15
17
18
34
10
22
28
30
33
42
5v5
CGY
3
17:41
 
5
15
17
18
27
34
10
12
22
27
30
36
5v5
STL
3
17:13
 
4
8
25
33
34
40
12
21
25
27
30
74
5v5
STL
3
17:12
 
4
8
25
33
34
40
5
12
21
25
30
74
5v5
CGY
3
15:08
 
4
12
17
18
28
34
21
25
27
30
46
74
5v5
CGY
3
14:22
Moss goal
5
6
8
25
34
40
10
28
30
33
36
42
5v5
CGY
3
13:31
 
4
12
13
20
28
34
5
21
25
30
46
74
5v5
CGY
3
13:26
 
5
6
15
17
18
34
5
10
22
30
42
46
5v5
STL
3
12:10
 
4
8
10
16
27
34
20
26
28
30
33
36
5v5
STL
3
11:07
 
13
16
20
27
33
34
12
21
25
27
30
74
5v5
STL
3
9:39
 
5
6
15
17
18
34
5
10
20
22
30
46
5v5
STL
3
7:52
 
12
13
20
27
33
34
5
15
20
30
36
46
5v5
CGY
3
5:54
 
10
11
25
27
33
34
12
15
20
27
30
36
5v5
STL
3
4:16
 
4
8
20
28
34
 
10
12
21
25
27
30
4v5
STL
3
2:07
 
4
12
18
20
28
34
12
21
25
28
30
74
5v5
#
Player
EV
PP
SH
4
J. BOUWMEESTER
22:08
7
6
2:35
1
1
1:34
0
1
5
M. GIORDANO
16:52
5
3
1:15
0
0
1:16
0
0
6
C. SARICH
17:09
4
5
0:00
0
0
1:10
0
0
8
B. MORRISON
13:28
2
5
3:39
2
0
2:28
0
1
10
N. HAGMAN
8:45
3
1
0:26
0
0
0:00
0
0
11
M. BACKLUND
8:12
2
2
0:00
0
0
0:00
0
0
12
J. IGINLA
15:45
2
4
3:39
2
0
0:00
0
0
13
O. JOKINEN
15:29
5
3
2:30
0
1
0:00
0
0
15
T. JACKMAN
10:26
4
2
1:35
0
0
0:00
0
0
16
T. KOSTOPOULOS
10:12
2
4
0:51
0
0
1:02
0
0
17
R. BOURQUE
13:54
5
5
2:14
0
1
0:28
0
0
18
M. STAJAN
12:07
5
3
0:15
0
0
0:28
0
0
20
C. GLENCROSS
14:52
4
3
1:45
2
0
2:28
0
1
25
D. MOSS
11:42
5
2
1:30
0
1
1:12
0
0
27
S. STAIOS
12:32
4
4
1:02
1
0
0:50
0
0
28
R. REGEHR
20:15
6
3
0:15
0
0
2:52
0
1
33
A. BABCHUK
10:47
2
5
3:51
1
1
0:34
0
0
34
M. KIPRUSOFF
49:42
14
13
6:08
2
1
4:08
0
1
40
A. TANGUAY
12:15
3
4
3:18
1
0
0:10
0
0
Period
Totals
EV
PP
5v3 PP
SH
5v3 SH
1
7
2
5
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
4
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
7
9
7
8
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Totals
16
15
14
13
2
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
Not a lot going on in this contest for the first couple of periods. Both teams were kept to the outside and the scoring chances they did happen to generate were mostly along the edge of the scoring area. The third was certainly more active and the Flames happened to be the club to cash in on one of their chances, while the Blues hit a couple of posts. The margin between the two clubs as thin so the 1-0 score is a pretty fair representation.
As far as individuals go, Iginla had his second straight nominal outing while David Moss was, again, the best Flames forward on the ice. Mosser isn’t going to be able to tow the line himself forever so Iginla is going to need to pull out of his funk if the Flames are going to continue to compete for a playoff spot.