FlamesNation has no direct affiliation to the Calgary Flames, Calgary Sports and Entertainment, NHL, or NHLPA
Flames Forwards Shot Rates – Part 1

By Kent Wilson
Sep 10, 2012, 14:11 EDT
Ryan Lambert recently noted Mike Cammalleri’s low shot volume in his Five Things feature. That mention got me curious about investigating the main guy’s shot rates last year in depth and to relate it to their possession rates and overall performance.
The best scorers in the league are high volume shooters. Usually, they combine some degree of accuracy as well (12-13% or better personal shooting percentage), but getting a lot of goals almost always comes down to getting a lot of shots. That’s one of the reason why it’s important for a team’s stars to be in the offensive zone and getting pucks on net.
I’m going to restrict this inquiry to even strength shot rates. PP ice time is restricted to a few guys and dependent on opportunity, so not as that indicative of ability. Let’s start with the basics (info via www.behindthnet.ca):
| NAME | GP | TOI/60 | G | SH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JAROMEIGINLA | 82 | 16.37 | 22 | 161 |
OLLIJOKINEN | 82 | 14.63 | 13 | 144 |
BLAKECOMEAU | 74 | 13.21 | 5 | 114 |
MICHAELCAMMALLERI | 66 | 13.76 | 17 | 98 |
LEESTEMPNIAK | 61 | 12.57 | 12 | 95 |
TOMKOSTOPOULOS | 81 | 10.75 | 2 | 80 |
DAVIDMOSS | 32 | 11.5 | 2 | 74 |
MIKAELBACKLUND | 41 | 13.02 | 2 | 70 |
CURTISGLENCROSS | 67 | 13.3 | 15 | 68 |
MATTSTAJAN | 61 | 11.36 | 7 | 66 |
ALEXTANGUAY | 64 | 13.82 | 10 | 46 |
Nothing really unexpected here – Iginla and Jokinen played the most at 5on5 and also played the full 82-game season, so were bound to lead the pack. Now, let’s see how efficient each player was with his ice time by controlling for that variable:
| NAME | GP | TOI/60 | G | SH | TS | ES ICE | shots/game | shots/60 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAVIDMOSS | 32 | 11.5 | 2 | 74 | 76 | 368 | 2.38 | 12.39 |
LEESTEMPNIAK | 61 | 12.57 | 12 | 95 | 107 | 767 | 1.75 | 8.37 |
JAROMEIGINLA | 82 | 16.37 | 22 | 161 | 183 | 1342 | 2.23 | 8.18 |
MIKAELBACKLUND | 41 | 13.02 | 2 | 70 | 72 | 534 | 1.76 | 8.09 |
OLLIJOKINEN | 82 | 14.63 | 13 | 144 | 157 | 1200 | 1.91 | 7.85 |
MICHAELCAMMALLERI | 66 | 13.76 | 17 | 98 | 115 | 908 | 1.74 | 7.60 |
BLAKECOMEAU | 74 | 13.21 | 5 | 114 | 119 | 978 | 1.61 | 7.30 |
MATTSTAJAN | 61 | 11.36 | 7 | 66 | 73 | 693 | 1.20 | 6.32 |
TOMKOSTOPOULOS | 81 | 10.75 | 2 | 80 | 82 | 871 | 1.01 | 5.65 |
CURTISGLENCROSS | 67 | 13.3 | 15 | 68 | 83 | 891 | 1.24 | 5.59 |
ALEXTANGUAY | 64 | 13.82 | 10 | 46 | 56 | 884 | 0.88 | 3.80 |
To put these rates in context, here’s an article from Cam Charron last March looking at the league leaders in ES shots/60. The top 20 or so players were in the 10+ shots/60 territory. The list includes high-end stars (Zetterberg, Kessel, Nash, Ovechkin) emerging snipers (Seguin, Kane, Landeskog) and a smattering of third liners who are good enough to outplay other third liners like Moss (Cleary, Clarkson, Larose, Kennedy).
In the next part of this series, I will show why the Flames stars shot rates are relatively lackluster by applying corsi/possession stats and showing how they moderate personal and on-ice scoring rates.
Breaking News
- The Flames face some tough forward decisions if they ever get fully healthy
- Flames after 10 games: rounding into form after an ugly start
- Recap: Wranglers allow three unanswered goals in third period against Canucks, fall 3-1
- Beyond the Boxscore: Flames goaltending leads them to victory again as Calgary topples Detroit
- The Flames’ team game was on display against the Red Wings

