FlamesNation has no direct affiliation to the Calgary Flames, Calgary Sports and Entertainment, NHL, or NHLPA
Flames Scoring Chances – Game 9 vs St.Louis Blues
alt
Kent Wilson
Oct 28, 2011, 23:46 EDTUpdated: Oct 28, 2011, 23:38 EDT
Final score: 3-1 win
Scoring Chances for NHL Game Number 20139
Team
Period
Time
Note
CGY
Opponent
 
STL
1
18:02
0
6
17
22
27
34
51
1
15
20
28
44
46
5v5
STL
1
17:03
0
6
8
12
27
34
40
1
5
15
20
22
44
5v5
STL
1
13:33
0
5
12
23
34
40
51
1
6
15
20
27
44
5v5
CGY
1
11:53
0
4
8
17
22
34
44
1
21
28
36
46
74
5v5
STL
1
10:11
0
4
6
12
16
17
34
1
17
25
28
42
46
5v5
CGY
1
9:35
0
5
22
23
34
40
51
1
6
21
27
36
74
5v5
CGY
1
8:19
0
4
13
20
25
34
44
1
15
20
22
44
46
5v5
STL
1
2:24
0
4
17
22
34
44
 
1
21
22
28
36
74
4v5
STL
2
19:38
0
5
17
22
23
34
51
1
6
17
25
27
42
5v5
CGY
2
15:41
0
4
8
12
34
40
44
1
6
21
27
36
74
5v5
STL
2
14:58
0
4
8
12
16
34
44
1
5
21
22
32
36
5v5
STL
2
13:50
0
5
17
22
23
34
51
1
15
20
28
44
46
5v5
STL
2
13:49
0
5
17
22
23
34
51
1
15
20
28
44
46
5v5
STL
2
7:51
0
4
8
12
34
40
44
1
6
21
27
36
74
5v5
CGY
2
6:27
0
5
6
13
17
22
34
1
17
25
28
42
46
5v5
CGY
2
5:15
Kosto goal
15
16
23
27
34
51
1
6
12
27
74
78
5v5
CGY
2
4:37
+1
8
12
23
27
34
40
1
5
21
22
36
74
5v5
CGY
3
19:52
+1
5
6
17
22
34
51
1
6
17
25
27
42
5v5
STL
3
12:12
+1
5
20
23
25
34
 
1
21
22
28
36
74
4v5
STL
3
12:11
+1
5
20
23
25
34
 
1
21
22
28
36
74
4v5
STL
3
11:59
+1
5
20
23
25
34
 
1
21
22
28
36
74
4v5
STL
3
11:44
+1
5
20
23
25
34
 
1
21
22
28
36
74
4v5
STL
3
11:43
+1
5
20
23
25
34
 
1
21
22
28
36
74
4v5
STL
3
11:14
+1
6
23
25
34
 
 
1
20
25
27
42
44
3v5
CGY
3
10:39
+1
4
6
23
25
34
 
1
20
25
27
42
44
4v5
CGY
3
7:55
Horak goal
6
15
16
27
34
51
1
5
15
20
22
44
5v5
STL
3
5:46
+1
17
22
23
27
34
51
1
5
21
22
25
36
5v5
STL
3
4:58
+1
5
6
13
20
25
34
1
15
20
27
44
46
5v5
#
Player
EV
PP
SH
4
J. BOUWMEESTER
20:42
3
3
1:39
0
0
1:47
1
1
5
M. GIORDANO
16:55
3
5
2:15
0
0
2:07
0
5
6
C. SARICH
13:22
3
4
0:00
0
0
0:08
1
0
8
B. MORRISON
15:40
3
3
0:04
0
0
0:00
0
0
12
J. IGINLA
17:18
2
5
2:04
0
0
0:00
0
0
13
O. JOKINEN
15:47
2
1
1:56
0
0
0:00
0
0
15
T. JACKMAN
9:22
2
0
1:12
0
0
0:00
0
0
16
T. KOSTOPOULOS
12:24
2
2
0:19
0
0
0:29
0
0
17
R. BOURQUE
12:31
3
6
1:56
0
0
2:05
0
1
20
C. GLENCROSS
13:33
1
1
1:56
0
0
2:12
0
5
22
L. STEMPNIAK
11:47
4
5
1:11
0
0
0:59
0
1
23
S. HANNAN
16:37
3
5
0:00
0
0
2:15
1
5
25
D. MOSS
12:27
1
1
1:07
0
0
1:25
1
5
27
D. SMITH
14:34
3
3
0:53
0
0
0:18
0
0
33
A. BABCHUK
4:18
0
0
0:56
0
0
0:00
0
0
34
M. KIPRUSOFF
50:35
9
11
4:19
0
0
4:12
1
6
40
A. TANGUAY
15:01
3
3
2:36
0
0
0:16
0
0
44
C. BUTLER
15:00
3
2
0:19
0
0
1:57
0
1
51
R. HORAK
15:37
4
6
1:12
0
0
0:50
0
0
Period
Totals
EV
PP
5v3 PP
SH
5v3 SH
1
3
5
3
4
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
4
5
4
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
8
2
2
0
0
0
0
1
5
0
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Totals
10
18
9
11
0
0
0
0
1
6
0
1
Flames outchanced by almost a 2-1 margin tonight despite winning the game. Things were relatively close at ES as both clubs were fairly sloppy at 5on5, so the real difference was special teams: the Blues managed 6 chances to the Flames 1. It didn’t make a difference to the final outcome, but that’s only because Kipper stood on his head the Blues missed a handful of 10 bell chances by a few inches.
Att he other end, Roman Horak stayed hot and generated another couple of points. He was pretty good despite a negative chance differential. The big guns, on the other hand were mostly non-existant. The PP was totally punchless with them on the ice and Iginla managed just two ES chances in 17:00 minutes of ice.
Calgary is winning some games right now on the back of good goaltending, nice bounces and the singular efforts of a rookie. It’s nice to see but it’s not a formula for success long-term. They need to start generating more chances in general and the PP has to become far more potent in particular.